On the Edge of the Abyss May 10 2022

kenmuldoon55

Well-known member

Throwing Truth to the Earth Part 1​

February 10th, 2018​


This is an updated revision of a previously published article.

The world is full of lies and liars. And it is no wonder, the presently presiding overlord and god of this world is none other than Satan the Devil – the Deceiver and “the father of the lie,” according to Jesus. The extent of Satan’s influence can be gauged by considering that the 12th chapter of Revelation states that the Devil “is misleading the entire inhabited earth.” In other words, Satan is misleading the whole world.
Unfortunately, the chief demon’s work is made much easier due to the fact that people – most people anyway – actually prefer to believe lies. That is evident in so many ways. One simple example: Parents routinely lie to their children by tricking them into believing that Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny are real. A small thing perhaps, obviously innocent to an extent, but do not such lies subconsciously condition a child to accept lying and deception as normal?

And that is just the beginning. The Big Lies are institutionalized. Consider: As soon as children enter school they are subjected to the insidious lies of evolution and atheism. And if they receive any religious “education,” regardless of the religion involved, they are certain to be indoctrinated into a whole range of falsehoods. One virtually universal lie is the fraud of the immortal soul. But because the lies come from respected sources of authority, most people do not have the resources within themselves to resist believing what they are told.

Back in the 1950s when television was introduced to the Western world the social engineers realized they had a very powerful tool to persuade and misinform. Back in 1981 one such programmer boasted: “I know the secret of making the average American believe anything I want him to. Just let me control television…. You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV set images.” (How the British Use the Media for Mass Psychological Warfare.)
600x600bb-85-300x300.jpg


That statement was made almost 40 years ago and look at the insipid and degrading programs that are now being broadcasted into millions of homes? Ironically, program producers call the most degrading and popular programs “reality TV,” apparently because the mind-numbed viewer conforms to the unreality in which they are immersed. (Maybe some of the Pentecostal sects are on to something in their refusal to bring television into their homes?)

Consider the lies associated with 911. As was common knowledge at the time of the attack nearly all the hijackers were Saudi nationals. None of them were Afghanis or Iraqis. Yet, after the attack the Anglo-American combine immediately invaded Afghanistan and started beating the war drums against Iraq and invaded that nation shortly thereafter. Incredibly, even a year after the lies of Saddam’s WMD program were exposed a poll revealed that more than 40% of Americans still believed that the Iraqis had weapons of mass destruction and were responsible for the September 11 attack! Reality TV indeed!
9-11 Twin Towers in flames


More amazingly, even though the take down of the Twin Towers with a kamikaze-like attacks using hijacked passenger planes was repeatedly shown around the world on television, apparently a growing number of people now believe the fantastic tale that the US government rigged the buildings with tons of explosives to detonate after the planes smashed into the towers —as if the impact of speeding aircraft carrying tons of jet fuel were not enough to do the job! No doubt the disinformation serves the purpose of the real criminals – distracting and disorienting the public.
“apparently a growing number of people now believe the fantastic tale that the US government rigged the buildings with tons of explosives to detonate after the planes smashed into the towers —as if the impact of speeding aircraft carrying tons of jet fuel were not enough to do the job!”
You mean the myriads of building engineers,architects and airline pilots who’ve rejected out of hand the government’s far fetched 9/11 findings?
 

kenmuldoon55

Well-known member
PJ, You say that it was a tale that the twin towers were loaded with explosives and taken down with that. I beg to differ. The building fires were over after the planes hit. The only thing that could bring the towers down was explosives. They found foundry like melted steel underground months after the buildings fell. One could even see it pouring down from the building as it still stood.. Thermite melts steel like that. Then we have building 7 it too fell straight down. no plane hit that. They used the same explosive thermite to make that building fall straight down as well. There is a real reason why people believe the explosives route. Because its true. Those buildings were made to hold the impact of a plane. As they did. They needed more to demolish them and that is what they did. They fell exactly as demolished buildings do.
Exactly right.
The article is supposed to highlight how the world accepts lies readily but then goes on to foster another one. Sad.
Everything the government tells you should, by default, be rejected as a lie especially when what they’re trying to sell you forwards their demonic foreign policy of warring on other countries which 9/11 paved the way for in a massive way.
 
Last edited:

BARNABY THE DOG.

Well-known member
If the Watchtower's interpretation is correct and Russia is the king of the north, then we must expect Russia to conquer the world at some point, soon.
Flood it with vodka? Seriously though, I do not see Russia backing down. What I do see is that their war strategy thus far is so weak (by todays standards - it took the allies 11 months of slaughter to reach a shorter distance to Berlin in 1945) that they will resort to nuclear or EMP sooner rather than later. The west is forever upping the anti and drawing Russia into expanding the conflict.
 

Watchman

Moderator
Staff member
“apparently a growing number of people now believe the fantastic tale that the US government rigged the buildings with tons of explosives to detonate after the planes smashed into the towers —as if the impact of speeding aircraft carrying tons of jet fuel were not enough to do the job!”
You mean the myriads of building engineers,architects and airline pilots who’ve rejected out of hand the government’s far fetched 9/11 findings?
No. I am not talking about the FBI cover-up. I mean empty-headed people who cannot believe that two giant jetliners loaded with tons of fuel piloted by Saudi terrorists trained in the USA mashing into two skyscrapers could not have brought them down.
 

Watchman

Moderator
Staff member
Flood it with vodka? Seriously though, I do not see Russia backing down. What I do see is that their war strategy thus far is so weak (by todays standards - it took the allies 11 months of slaughter to reach a shorter distance to Berlin in 1945) that they will resort to nuclear or EMP sooner rather than later. The west is forever upping the anti and drawing Russia into expanding the conflict.
At this point, Russia doesn't have to do anything. The leaders of the EU are in a rush to punish Russia by destroying themselves. Russia has weathered the sanctions fine. America and Europe are collapsing and seem intent to hasten the process.
 

BARNABY THE DOG.

Well-known member
Exactly right.
The article is supposed to highlight how the world accepts lies readily but then goes on to foster another one. Sad.
Everything the government tells you should, by default, be rejected as a lie especially when what they’re trying to sell you forwards their demonic foreign policy of warring on other countries which 9/11 paved the way for in a massive way.
I’m one of Robert‘s empty headed people who think the towers could not be taken down by a one aircraft strike. Not that I mind of course, each to their own analysis. Yet you guys have a first class example of air strike by aircraft in the Empire State Building. What is unavoidable though is the fact that the buildings went down free fall. That is just not going to happen as the undamaged supporting floors would have inhibited the fall of the above floors. The above floors would also have retained much of their support as well, as was made clear by their withstanding the impact. I prefer the scientific approach documented by professor Woods, and whose argument has yet to be refuted. Finally, given that the subterranean floors were still intact to a degree, is significant, as the detritus from the above ground structure was by compassion, simply not to be found. No matter who caused the attack, the outcome was achieved, but clearly, the buildings were insured to cover costs. As shown by building 7, it was all planned, but no one was going to go to war with both towers still standing and repairable. There is another factor worth considering and that is the law of equal and opposite energy flows. The issue is a factor between weight and speed. The tower weighed 250,000 tons. The aircraft 300 tons. The speed 350mph, plus resistance which given the central core of the building being its main support and the open framework surrounding it bearing the brunt of the impact , it needs further investigation at the very least.
 

Watchman

Moderator
Staff member
I’m one of Robert‘s empty headed people who think the towers could not be taken down by a one aircraft strike. Not that I mind of course, each to their own analysis. Yet you guys have a first class example of air strike by aircraft in the Empire State Building. What is unavoidable though is the fact that the buildings went down free fall. That is just not going to happen as the undamaged supporting floors would have inhibited the fall of the above floors. The above floors would also have retained much of their support as well, as was made clear by their withstanding the impact. I prefer the scientific approach documented by professor Woods, and whose argument has yet to be refuted. Finally, given that the subterranean floors were still intact to a degree, is significant, as the detritus from the above ground structure was by compassion, simply not to be found. No matter who caused the attack, the outcome was achieved, but clearly, the buildings were insured to cover costs. As shown by building 7, it was all planned, but no one was going to go to war with both towers still standing and repairable. There is another factor worth considering and that is the law of equal and opposite energy flows. The issue is a factor between weight and speed. The tower weighed 250,000 tons. The aircraft 300 tons. The speed 350mph, plus resistance which given the central core of the building being its main support and the open framework surrounding it bearing the brunt of the impact , it needs further investigation at the very least.
What happened was, after the fires burned for about an hour the steel was weakened. The rivets melted and once the top floor collapsed on the floor below it then that floor collapsed onto the floor below it. Then you had the weight of three floors crashing down on the next floor below. After the pancake effect the supporting vertical beams started to buckle and down they came. I watched it on tv a few dozen times. ;)
 

Carl

Well-known member
What happened was, after the fires burned for about an hour the steel was weakened. The rivets melted and once the top floor collapsed on the floor below it then that floor collapsed onto the floor below it. Then you had the weight of three floors crashing down on the next floor below. After the pancake effect the supporting vertical beams started to buckle and down they came. I watched it on tv a few dozen times. ;)
I'm an empty head as well... along with 5,000+ architects and engineers, because jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. It was either thermite or DEWs. My money's on thermite. George Bush's brother Neil was put in charge of security in the weeks leading up to the attack. The owner of the buildings just happen to place double insurance for a terrorist event in the months preceding. The Patriot Act was already written. The Middle East wars were already planned. No plane debris at the Pentagram or in the farm field... I could go on and own.
 

kenmuldoon55

Well-known member
The problem with your thinking is that a fuel fire burns quickly and cannot generate enough heat to damage steel. Nor did it melt or damage the lower steel structure let's suppose the upper section collapsed. The lower section would still hold it up. What we saw was free fall collapse meaning nothing was holding it up. That's because they demolished it. I did my research on this as did thousands of architects and engineers. They certainly are not empty headed.
What happened was, after the fires burned for about an hour the steel was weakened. The rivets melted and once the top floor collapsed on the floor below it then that floor collapsed onto the floor below it. Then you had the weight of three floors crashing down on the next floor below. After the pancake effect the supporting vertical beams started to buckle and down they came. I watched it on tv a few dozen times. ;)
But the pancaking effect would retard the collapse way below free fall velocities Robert.
 

kenmuldoon55

Well-known member
Exactly right.
The article is supposed to highlight how the world accepts lies readily but then goes on to foster another one. Sad.
Everything the government tells you should, by default, be rejected as a lie especially when what they’re trying to sell you forwards their demonic foreign policy of warring on other countries which 9/11 paved the way for in a massive way.

We can each hold an opinion about current events and their meaning and that’s what being human is all about.
Robert has his notions about 9/11 and I have mine but that in no way diminishes our common faith in the outworking of Jehovahs will.
I guess I really opened up a can of worms on this topic and we each espouse differing opinions on what really happened that day, but I think we can all agree that the government has an agenda and has no issues with sacrificing its own citizens to accomplish their end game.
After all, isn’t that why in scripture governments are referred to as beasts?
How this plays out in the future will certainly mimic their past patterns and we all need to be on guard.
Let’s pray for each other’s survival.
 

PJ54

Well-known member
We can each hold an opinion about current events and their meaning and that’s what being human is all about.
Robert has his notions about 9/11 and I have mine but that in no way diminishes our common faith in the outworking of Jehovahs will.
I guess I really opened up a can of worms on this topic and we each espouse differing opinions on what really happened that day, but I think we can all agree that the government has an agenda and has no issues with sacrificing its own citizens to accomplish their end game.
After all, isn’t that why in scripture governments are referred to as beasts?
How this plays out in the future will certainly mimic their past patterns and we all need to be on guard.
Let’s pray for each other’s survival.
Regardless how 9/11 played out, one thing is true to it:
(Ecclesiastes 8:9) 9 All of this I have seen, and I applied my heart to every work that has been done under the sun, during the time that man has dominated man to his harm.
 

MickHewitt

Well-known member

Downfall of America Part 1​

January 4th, 2018
View attachment 1182

It is natural to ponder what each new year may bring. In these beginning days of 2018 it seems especially fitting for people of faith to do so; the reason being, because, even from a casual assessment it certainly seems that the world has never been more perilously close to nuclear war.
Ironically, though, from the perspective of Jehovah’s Witnesses, the world’s present situation is largely irrelevant. That is because the Watchtower sets our expectations based upon the Governing Body’s understanding of prophecy. And according to the Watchtower, the only thing left unfulfilled —other than the attack of Gog and the war of Armageddon —is the destruction of organized religion by the United Nations.

On that front there is nothing notable to report. It is more likely that Earth will be struck by the mythical Planet X than that the U.N. might initiate the violent destruction of Babylon the Great. Seriously, though, besides the fact that the U.N. is a toothless tiger and could not possibly bring about the eradication of all religious institutions globally, at least not in the current political environment and ordering of nations, there is no indication that the powers-that-be are even inclined to do so. On the contrary, religion does not appear to have lost any measurable influence.
In Russia, for instance, the Orthodox Church is more powerful than it has ever been in the last 100 years —since the Bolshevik revolution —evidenced by the shocking liquidation of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Russia in 2017. Or are we to pretend that the Orthodox Church was not behind the ban?

By all accounts evangelicals in the United States are thriving too, as can be seen by the phenomenon of teeming mega-churches.

Meanwhile, in the U.S. the Watchtower dissolved nearly 500 congregations in 2017 alone. (See graphic below) Dozens of fully functional kingdom halls have been shuttered and dumped on the real estate market. Far from the waters of Babylon drying up, as the brothers used to be fond of saying, it is the Watchtower that is experiencing a steady erosion of support. Surely, if it were not for the baptism of younger and younger children in recent years and the Service Department allowing 15-minute monthly field service reports, the numbers of active publishers in America and Europe would surely reveal negative “growth.” No wonder the Governing Body decided to stop publishing the Year Book. As Paul might say, your cause for boasting is not fine.

Be that as it may, what about the coming year?
Is this the order of Anglo/American destruction: America then U.K? ISA23:5 "As when they heard the report about Egypt people will be in anguish over the report about Tyre."
The glorious result of Tyre? Verse 18 " But her profit and her hire will become something holy to Jehovah. It will not be stored or laid away because her hire will be for those dwelling before Jehovah so that they may eat to satisfaction and wear elegant clothing."
 
Last edited:
Top