Some weird stuff in the blood.

PJ54

Well-known member

Study Using Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis Shows Abnormalities in Blood of Jabbed Patients​

Is the U.S. Blood Supply Tainted?​


Deadly COVID Vaccines and the Mysterious Downward Spiral​

 

kirmmy

Well-known member
A tainted blood supply could have interesting outcomes considering Jah's prohibition on blood, eh. I've always wondered about that prohibition in regard to the science of transfusions. As some have said the prohibition applies to feeding ourselves. But JWs can see there is a deeper symbolic meaning to blood and God's order that we abstain from it. Jehovah saw it way back when he prohibited blood and now we are protected by following him.
 

PJ54

Well-known member
A tainted blood supply could have interesting outcomes considering Jah's prohibition on blood, eh. I've always wondered about that prohibition in regard to the science of transfusions. As some have said the prohibition applies to feeding ourselves. But JWs can see there is a deeper symbolic meaning to blood and God's order that we abstain from it. Jehovah saw it way back when he prohibited blood and now we are protected by following him.
IIRC it might have something to do with "Body Memory". The blood is said to have the essence of life within it so perhaps it's to avoid altering an individual.
 

SusanB

Well-known member
IIRC it might have something to do with "Body Memory". The blood is said to have the essence of life within it so perhaps it's to avoid altering an individual.
There is A LOT that humans don’t know about blood. But we know enough because Jehovah has told us how he views it and what to do with it when a person or animals bleeds.

Deuteronomy 12:23-25: “Just be firmly resolved not to eat the blood, because the blood is the life, and you must not eat the life with the flesh. You must not eat it. You should pour it out on the ground like water. You must not eat it, so that it may go well with you and your children after you, because you are doing what is right in Jehovah’s eyes”.

Acts 15:28-29: “For the holy spirit and we ourselves have favored adding no further burden to you except these necessary things: to keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols, from blood, from what is strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you carefully keep yourselves from these things, you will prosper. Good health to you!”
 

SpicySpice

Well-known member
IIRC it might have something to do with "Body Memory". The blood is said to have the essence of life within it so perhaps it's to avoid altering an individual.
And if we shouldn't be altering ourselves by taking in someone else's essence of life.. why should we be letting the government, governing body, or big pharma make us alter our bodies with mrna and spike proteins? To remain in the land of the living?
 

robins

Well-known member
A tainted blood supply could have interesting outcomes considering Jah's prohibition on blood, eh. I've always wondered about that prohibition in regard to the science of transfusions. As some have said the prohibition applies to feeding ourselves. But JWs can see there is a deeper symbolic meaning to blood and God's order that we abstain from it. Jehovah saw it way back when he prohibited blood and now we are protected by following him.
it could also have to do with our connection to animals... How do we know for sure how the blood was drained from the animal meat we buy in a store? unless we witness it or drain the blood ourselves. this provision could be meant to cognitively recognize the sanctity (or selfishness) of taking another life for consumption by being closer to the act
 

Sundial

Well-known member
it could also have to do with our connection to animals... How do we know for sure how the blood was drained from the animal meat we buy in a store? unless we witness it or drain the blood ourselves. this provision could be meant to cognitively recognize the sanctity (or selfishness) of taking another life for consumption by being closer to the act
I think in most (first world) countries animals are bled when slaughtered as a health department requirement, otherwise blood would coagulate in the meat and you'd know it. It's why we don't strangle chickens.. Sorry I got a little off subject here. :rolleyes:
 

robins

Well-known member
I think in most (first world) countries animals are bled when slaughtered as a health department requirement, otherwise blood would coagulate in the meat and you'd know it. It's why we don't strangle chickens.. Sorry I got a little off subject here. :rolleyes:
Trust in the process of slaughter houses is akin to trusting pharma companies... they'll do what makes the most profit and what they can get away with. And what about non-first world countries on a more local scale? I've never seen a WT publication address this issue vs the disproportionate energy spent on nuances around blood transfusions. I doubt any of the GB is vegetarian, which kinda speaks for itself.
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
Some things happen by design while others only after a need is realized. They got in such a rush to push their injections that nobody thought about the effects on their use of blood. Now they are trying to keep the problem of a lack of untainted blood quiet while at the same time working to figure out a solution. See, even doctors are still pushing these magic injections and denying the blood problem it caused at the same time.
I can't see down the road as to where this could lead but in this evil world, I can imagine a lot, especially with what we know about China.

My ex-wife has an aunt who is dead because of the greed of one particular doctor/surgeon in Arizona who thought to make some extra money. A lot of money actually. Yet another item that contributed to my lack of trust in doctors. I think the command on blood is going to prove itself to be very important in the near future.
 

LazerHarp

Well-known member
You have to ask, if the shot never stopped transmission or infection, why did they want people to take it so badly?
This was on a global scale!
Could this be the first stage towards the mark?
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
You have to ask, if the shot never stopped transmission or infection, why did they want people to take it so badly?
This was on a global scale!
Could this be the first stage towards the mark?
For now it's experimentation and an establishment of control. You might recall that nearly every nation around the globe tried to make it mandatory. Since this has taken so long, some people are forgetting the evil things they tried to do. A lot of people lost their jobs fo refusing the jabs. Another goal is depopulation. It's safe to say they had to be careful in how many of the shots would kill people or we would catch on. Some died instantly while others are developing health problem which won't take more than a few years to kill them. Some just keel over a few weeks or month later.
The bible says 1/3 of the earth. I think it's reasonable to assume that this is part of that tally in one way or another. There may be more than one experiment in these jabs. We can't know since they still won't be honest about the ingredients. If a person has a brain, that is reason enough to refuse them alone. If this is a step toward the mark then I would say that it is because of their insisting that we obey them which is what the mark boils down to. Obedience and if not, they find another way to kill us. It sounds crazy unless you've been listening to these people and what they want to do to the earth and us. If that isn't enough then you need to listen to a little more Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari.
 

LazerHarp

Well-known member
Yes, depop has been in full swing and is really a working piece or part of eugenics. This has been a major governance tool since the 1800s for the west. The wef guys like Schwab / Harari are just the latest front men for the big foundations, philanthropists/industrialists.
Sir Francis Galton was one of the pioneers of this movement. The young global leaders echo a lot of his ideas in a more polished/palatable way
for the 21st century.
 
Top