LifeLearning
Well-known member
Chapter 2 blows dozens of holes in the watchtower (WT) 1914 doctrine. Is there anyone who would refute these? Robert King clearly explains with logic, fact and scripture how the WT have it wrong. The only chance the WT have in maintaining their doctrine is to keep people from reading this work.
Bold statements like this one below are completely explained before asserting:
There is, therefore, no scriptural justification in applying the seven times of Daniel to “the appointed times of the nations” about which Christ spoke. However, neither is there any scriptural indication that “the appointed times of the nations” began when the Roman imperial legions trampled the Jewish holy place in 70 C.E.
I say this to anyone peeking over the fence that has even the slightest doubt: If you are a Jehovah's Witness, and accept the WT explanation of how Christ's Kingdom began in 1914, you have it wrong and are at risk of perishing with the world. If your faith is so weak that you cannot handle reading this one chapter then you will remain a baby for your entire life, never moving on from milk to solid food. Please brothers, read this.
Bold statements like this one below are completely explained before asserting:
There is, therefore, no scriptural justification in applying the seven times of Daniel to “the appointed times of the nations” about which Christ spoke. However, neither is there any scriptural indication that “the appointed times of the nations” began when the Roman imperial legions trampled the Jewish holy place in 70 C.E.
I say this to anyone peeking over the fence that has even the slightest doubt: If you are a Jehovah's Witness, and accept the WT explanation of how Christ's Kingdom began in 1914, you have it wrong and are at risk of perishing with the world. If your faith is so weak that you cannot handle reading this one chapter then you will remain a baby for your entire life, never moving on from milk to solid food. Please brothers, read this.