Civil War Updates

kirmmy said:
You'd think that's good news but, yeah, that is very worrisome for the reasons they stated. I don't know why Trump can't follow your Constitution. It speaks of the importance of the separation of Church and State quite plainly.

No Theocracy until it's the Christ's Theocracy.
Click to expand...
They hate Trump with a deep passion and now because Trump supports Christianity they will hate Christianity even more.
 
Separation of Church and State has nothing to do with protecting and harassing religious groups. America's founding was based on freedom of speech and religion. Europe persecuted Christians like William Tyndall and Michael Servetus. Even the Amish were persecuted. They and other religious groups moved to Pennsylvania to escape the tyranny of the Big Church of Europe who would consider other Christian denominations as herectic's and jail them or execute them. That was the reason for Church and States separation. So religious persecution wouldn't happen. It doesn't mean that the Government can't involve itself with a religion. Our tax payer dollars pay for police that protect religious targets from any crazy person that may try to do something crazy.

This anti Christian bill is a protection that aligns with the founding of America and it's freedom of religious beliefs. Quite the opposite of what you said, kirrmy.
 
The Constitution never said anything about a separation of church and state. What it says is that Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Those words don't make USA a Christian nation nor any other religion but it doesn't necessarily offer any protection either.
A large majority of the founding fathers were freemasons but many of those made a pretense of being more or less Christian as well.
You cannot eat from two tables in reality and they always knew that which begs the question as to how they finally agreed to the 1st Amendment the way it was written.
It has been argued here on this forum that it does seem that America was guided by a divine hand so as to allow the Gospel to spread more, untethered.
I've never read a counter argument that could disprove that. I agree with Bk Kevin in that this will make people hate Christians even more.
 
Soul Sage said:
Separation of Church and State has nothing to do with protecting and harassing religious groups. America's founding was based on freedom of speech and religion. Europe persecuted Christians like William Tyndall and Michael Servetus. Even the Amish were persecuted. They and other religious groups moved to Pennsylvania to escape the tyranny of the Big Church of Europe who would consider other Christian denominations as herectic's and jail them or execute them. That was the reason for Church and States separation. So religious persecution wouldn't happen. It doesn't mean that the Government can't involve itself with a religion. Our tax payer dollars pay for police that protect religious targets from any crazy person that may try to do something crazy.

This anti Christian bill is a protection that aligns with the founding of America and it's freedom of religious beliefs. Quite the opposite of what you said, kirrmy.
Click to expand...
I never said it did. The examples you gave are the reason there must be a separation of Church and State. If you give favor to one group then you are involving yourself in religion. As Bill said: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". That implies that the State won't get involved in religion except to protect the free exercise of religion...any religion.
 
kirmmy said:
I never said it did. The examples you gave are the reason there must be a separation of Church and State. If you give favor to one group then you are involving yourself in religion. As Bill said: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". That implies that the State won't get involved in religion except to protect the free exercise of religion...any religion.
Click to expand...
Maybe this is what is supposed to happen to kick things off?
 
kirmmy said:
Possibly... I found the latest Corbett article interesting. The pendulum in effect. Swinging to the right again. Hopefully this time God smashes it.

Back and to the Right: The Pendulum Swings Again | The Corbett Report

corbettreport.com corbettreport.com

He's very astute in noticing that whatever way the pendulum swings the same dirty deeds happen.
Click to expand...
I read a thing about the Rothschild family once that said, when they want a war to happen to get something done or to stop something, it happens. Corbett did an interview with a historian named Gerry Docherty which established the same thing that Robert says on here which is that City of London has long been in control. Not only that but that WW1 was really about the wealthy industrialists keeping control of the markets.
That interview was a huge departure from what I was taught about mean ole Germany. I'll go out on a limb here and assume that everything is a lie except for the soldiers and sailors who didn't come home.
I'm still getting constant accusations of being MAGA in comment areas on the news. Then when I point out the truth about Trump. Covid jabs and Israel, then they just disappear because they don't know what else to attack. Trump is now bargaining with Ukraine for mineral rights in exchange for more Aid.
Is that anything like USAID? The left or right thing is a useful tool but soon that will be done away with or at least altered because they will need the world united under one power and that doesn't happen with two sides.
They have a tool for that as well. The same principle as wartime hysteria. I've spoken about it a few times. That tool is used to combat or buffer any opposition to forcing yet another war.
You get the people in a frenzy of hate so they go along with it. It's shameful how effective that tool is.
In the future, we will be on one side and the rest of the world on the other and then the wartime hysteria will begin again. We will be the enemy who is threatening peace and the global world order.
You know the rest.
 
kirmmy said:
WHAAATTT?! That's crazy from the guy who would end the war in 24 hrs if he was elected, or so he said. Who cares how many are dying as long as Trump gets the Lithium and potash. /s
Click to expand...
There must be more to the story than they let out but that's what I've heard so far. My only question is how does he figure on getting the minerals until the "war" is over. The Elon connection was enough for me.
 
BREAKING: The Mexican Senate has officially approved the deployment of U.S. Special Forces to combat the cartels.

Could this action lead to civil war?

Remember Col. MacGregor interjected the following a couple of week ago as Judge Napolitano was concluding the interview:
"just one last comment just for the record judge so everybody hears this.

There will be a war on the border with Mexico. That’s coming and what we are doing now are half measure and that is going to blow up in our faces because there’s a tremendous amount of money at stake for the Cartels in Mexico if we truly secure the border."

“And I will goad Egyptians against Egyptians, and they will certainly war each one against his brother, and each one against his companion, city against city, kingdom against kingdom" Isaiah 19:2
 
Last edited:
Jerry&Phyllis said:
BREAKING: The Mexican Senate has officially approved the deployment of U.S. Special Forces to combat the cartels.

Could this action lead to civil war?

Remember Col. MacGregor interjected the following a couple of week ago as Judge Napolitano was concluding the interview:
"just one last comment just for the record judge so everybody hears this.

There will be a war on the border with Mexico. That’s coming and what we are doing now are half measure and that is going to blow up in our faces because there’s a tremendous amount of money at stake for the Cartels in Mexico if we truly secure the border."

“And I will goad Egyptians against Egyptians, and they will certainly war each one against his brother, and each one against his companion, city against city, kingdom against kingdom" Isaiah 19:2
Click to expand...
That is wild. What people do not realize is that the drug business is not really controlled by the cartels. They are merely the producers, movers, and money middlemen. The dope business was created and has always been one of the main income streams for the British Empire and its financial system. Just laundering the money streams is YUGE, over one trillion $$$. Trump's warring against the cartels is a flanking operation against the City of London. I think if LaRouche were alive he would give a similar analysis.
 
Watchman said:
That is wild. What people do not realize is that the drug business is not really controlled by the cartels. They are merely the producers, movers, and money middlemen. The dope business was created and has always been one of the main income streams for the British Empire and its financial system. Just laundering the money streams is YUGE, over one trillion $$$. Trump's warring against the cartels is a flanking operation against the City of London. I think if LaRouche were alive he would give a similar analysis.
Click to expand...
Interesting that the Empires withdrawal from Afghanistan's Opium business coincided with the introduction of Fentanyl to the market!
 
Watchman said:
rump's warring against the cartels is a flanking operation against the City of London. I think if LaRouche were alive he would give a similar analysis.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the insight.....The "City of London" appears to have its hand in almost everything which we have only begun to appreciate in the last year.
Appears we still have a lot to learn.:unsure:
 
MickHewitt said:
Interesting that the Empires withdrawal from Afghanistan's Opium business coincided with the introduction of Fentanyl to the market!
Click to expand...
The first edition of Dope Inc. was published almost 50 years ago. It rocked the British Monarchy, but they did damage control and ordered Sir George H. Bush to take LaRouche out, which he did in his first week in office.

Loading…

www.amazon.com
 
Last edited:
Watchman said:
That is wild. What people do not realize is that the drug business is not really controlled by the cartels. They are merely the producers, movers, and money middlemen. The dope business was created and has always been one of the main income streams for the British Empire and its financial system. Just laundering the money streams is YUGE, over one trillion $$$. Trump's warring against the cartels is a flanking operation against the City of London. I think if LaRouche were alive he would give a similar analysis.
Click to expand...
Well, that would not be a surprise. They were the first drug dealers of history.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top