Isaac Newton vs The Trinity

Jahrule

Well-known member
Some of you may already know this, but Isaac Newton was a huge critic of the Trinity.
Isaac Newton is widely revered as one of the greatest scientific minds in history, with his groundbreaking discoveries revolutionizing our understanding of physics and mathematics. However, few are aware that Newton also delved into theological matters, particularly his rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity—a belief held sacred by many. In this blog post, we explore Newton's controversial stance on the Trinity and the motivations behind his theological dissent.

The Doctrine of the Trinity: The doctrine of the Trinity, a cornerstone of Christian theology, asserts the belief in one God existing as three distinct persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit. This concept has deep historical roots and has been embraced by various Christian denominations.

Newton's Dissent: Isaac Newton, known primarily for his scientific achievements, harbored a strong interest in theological matters and engaged in extensive biblical studies. Throughout his life, he dedicated considerable time and effort to interpreting and scrutinizing religious texts. While he possessed deep religious convictions, his interpretations occasionally diverged from mainstream Christian doctrines.

Newton's rejection of the Trinity stemmed from his rigorous examination of biblical passages and a commitment to rational inquiry. He believed that the concept of the Trinity lacked sufficient scriptural support and was a product of later theological elaboration, rather than a fundamental biblical truth. Newton sought a more comprehensive understanding of God that aligned with his scientific mindset.

Biblical Interpretation: Newton engaged in meticulous biblical scholarship, analyzing ancient texts and scrutinizing early Christian writings. He emphasized the importance of understanding scripture in its historical and cultural context. By applying his analytical approach to theological matters, Newton concluded that the explicit scriptural evidence for the Trinity was insufficient.

Motivations behind Newton's Dissent: Newton's rejection of the Trinity did not arise from a desire to undermine Christian faith or challenge religious authority. Instead, his dissent reflected a commitment to intellectual honesty and an unwavering pursuit of truth. Newton's scientific endeavors shaped his belief in the power of reason and evidence, which he applied to all areas of inquiry, including religion.

Newton's Influence: It is important to note that Newton's views on the Trinity were not widely disseminated during his lifetime. He was cautious about sharing his controversial theological opinions, aware of the potential backlash they could elicit from the religious establishment. Consequently, his writings on the subject remained largely unpublished until after his death.

Conclusion: Isaac Newton's rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity was a testament to his intellectual integrity and inquisitive nature. While primarily recognized for his contributions to science and mathematics, Newton's exploration of theology and his dissenting stance on the Trinity underscored his unwavering commitment to truth and his willingness to challenge established beliefs. Whether one agrees or disagrees with Newton's theological convictions, his legacy serves as a reminder that even the most brilliant minds can engage in profound debates about matters both scientific and spiritual. The truth has always been there for people who cared to examine what it is.

Newton was far from perfect. He believed in other verifiably false things, like alchemy and a Bible code. I just think it's interesting how much he got right without an organization to help him.


 
L

Liv4ever

Guest
Professor David Harriman eloquently exposes the philosophic corruption of physics. After Newton left the world stage, his ideas were replaced by a new breed of philosophers like Conte and Locke, who sought to undermine the moral underpinnings inherent in creation. By blurring the lines between black and white, good and bad, right and wrong, they paved the way for evolution theory and ultimately nazism and eugenics.

 

Jahrule

Well-known member
Professor David Harriman eloquently exposes the philosophic corruption of physics. After Newton left the world stage, his ideas were replaced by a new breed of philosophers like Conte and Locke, who sought to undermine the moral underpinnings inherent in creation. By blurring the lines between black and white, good and bad, right and wrong, they paved the way for evolution theory and ultimately nazism and eugenics.

The cool thing about science is that it is a self correcting process. Even when scientific progress is suppressed, eventually the truth comes out. We're largely held back by the spirit of this world, and even now we manage to get some work done. It's far from perfect, but we maintain a slight window into reality. I imagine in the new world we won't be under the influence of this system anymore. Consequently, I think our understanding of everything is likely to increase drastically before paradise is complete. I think it's important to trust Jah with the details. I may not know exactly how all this stuff comes together. I am confident it will come together perfectly on God's time table.
 

PJ54

Well-known member
The reason I think Newton found alchemy interesting is due to the nature of it being the grandfather of chemistry. If you consider the line between science & the occult, the line is blured.
 
L

Liv4ever

Guest
The reason I think Newton found alchemy interesting is due to the nature of it being the grandfather of chemistry. If you consider the line between science & the occult, the line is blured.
It wasn't blue red, it was grey... you're welcome in advance from the spelling nazi
 
Top