It would be necessary to understand where ‘inspiration’ comes from. Inspiration is a mental response to a given understanding and it can lead to action in a creative way. The witnesses have been encouraged to believe that their analysis of the bible by the GB is a direct instruction from Jehovah. That is just not true. The bible notes that people are drawn out by their own desires. Analytical thinking is a product based on those desires and it is interpreted by our own brain into various forms of expression to explain in a language or gesture that which we are trying to accomplish. And to accomplish that accurately (not necessarily truthfully) depends on our motive. Simpleton or not does not come into it.
Modern parlance in ‘inspiration’ attaches what is already assumed by the listener to be the source of the subject matter. In this case not just the bible, but how the ‘inspired’ speaker wishes you to understand him. This is how the GB deceive the brethren, who are already primed to assume inspiration to translate meaning is from Jehovah. (Ergo New light). Jehovah is not inspired per se. He dictates fact and it is debatable in any context, what the source of inspiration may be as it is limited in so many ways, not least of which would be the means of expression by the one presumed to be inspired. For example, Wordsworth‘s poem “I wandered lonely as a cloud…” was inspired by a field of daffodils. One can argue what led him to pen such a poem - was it the flower, its scent, its maker, its sudden appearance as he turned a corner on his walk? Thus Jehovah does not have to communicate verbally to inspire. His creation is the inspiration for us all and critically, it is that which is in our hearts that translates whatsoever that inspiration speaks to us through the myriad complexities and desires of our soul.
So it is then, that we are all inspired by what we understand and what we understand is translated into action, value and belief from the proclivities of our heart motivation. If that is from the bible, then yes, that can inspire developmental inspiration in conjecture and through which, when grown open to discussion with others, can collate collective thinking into a reasonable consensus of agreement. Given that fact, it is certain that watchtower and indeed all of us are inspired to express by whatever means, what we understand. We have also been given a multiplicity of mental tools to apply, caution and instruct ourselves as to the value of what is said. And as the bible rightly points out, that valuation is based upon our heart motivation. We know, also from the bible, that Jehovah draws us according to that heart motivation and if there is ever a description of inspiration, then it is to our heart motivation that we look for it’s value. The greater our understanding then, the greater our application and expression becomes in describing truths content. This then, is the answer, that we are “drawn out by our own desires” or put another way, drawn out by out motivation through which our inspiration leads us. So yes, the GB certainly is inspired and so are we, but by what? Therein lies your true definition of inspiration.