NWT and World Vision

Carl

Well-known member
Jehovah told Adam he would die if he ate the fruit. Adam saw that Eve ate the fruit and lived. Adam may have questioned his faith/trust in Jehovah. He didn't eat the fruit believing he would die, because Eve was still alive, so he believed the lie Eve had believed... thus he was deceived. She probably ate a piece right in front of him.
 

KingdomLeast

Well-known member
Very good point. I think Satan, as well as his demons, are completely convinced they can win.
Seems to me Satan knows he won't win, he knows his time is short and if he's going down, he's taking as many as he possibly can. Of course, he's ignorant of God's plans and purposes.
 

Carl

Well-known member
So you believe he's in second death? No hope of a resurrection?
I was talking about this thread with my son and his church friend last night. It's not crystal clear what happens to Adam & Eve. On the one hand they were perfect, and Jehovah gave them clear instructions, which they disobeyed. As perfect human they were most likely (I try not to assume I know anything I can't prove) the most intelligent humans ever. They were also child-like in their innocence though, and had no concept of what a lie was. So here comes this serpent who tricks Eve into eating the fruit. She then proceeds to tell Adam what she was told, and I would guess he was pretty confused. On the one hand Jehovah told them they would die if they ate the fruit, yet here's Eve... still living, possible eating some of the fruit to show Adam it's OK. It had to be a pretty confusing situation.

I just don't believe Adam thought he would die if he ate the fruit... so he was deceived by Eve. I'm in no way excusing his actions, I'm just trying to understand his thought process. Could he now be questioning his faith or trust in Jehovah? Obviously we know the outcome, but put yourself in Adam's situation. His creator told him he would die if he ate the fruit, but Eve was still alive. Hindsight is 20/20, so it's easy for us to say what we would have done. He should have immediately told Eve she was still wrong to disobey Jehovah, and then begged Jah for an answer as to why she hadn't died.

I'm glad I'm not in charge of who does and doesn't get resurrected, because this is a tough call. Adam & Eve, although perfect, were blindsided by a situation they had possibly no preparation for... a lie. It doesn't matter to me if they are or aren't resurrected. I simply enjoy digging into topics like this because they make me think. This discussion made me think about the MOTB, and how Satan will lie in order to get people to take it. I know this discussion is pointless to some since they feel this topic is settled. I don't agree, and that's OK. I just don't want to see negativity or ridicule brought into the discussion. It turns people off when we Christians speak in absolutes about topics we can't prove 100%.

Robert does an excellent job of using the Bible to explain these topics, but since there are so many translations and differences of opinion... sometimes it's necessary to agree to disagree. The topic of hell, Jesus being Michael, the trinity (thanks to John 1:1 being mistranslated), Jephthah's daughter... and many others cause division. I don't believe hell is eternal, but because of the story about Lazarus and the rich man... I can't tell someone they're wrong if they do. I can try to explain why I believe Jesus is Michael, but again it's not worth it to argue as if I'm 100% correct. The Bible is intentionally left open to interpretation in some places in order to test our faith. Ultimately Jesus will give PERFECT clarification when he returns. Until then all we have is our personal Bible trained conscience to go by.
 

Summit

Well-known member
So you believe he's in second death? No hope of a resurrection?
The jury isn't in. Who am I to judge any decision God makes? Adam was perfect and chose to sin so the odds arent great, but if he wants to resurrect Adam thats up to him. I got a few questions if he does though.
 

Summit

Well-known member
I just don't believe Adam thought he would die if he ate the fruit... so he was deceived by Eve. I'm in no way excusing his actions, I'm just trying to understand his thought process.
Carl, I'm not gonna lie, that is some scary stuff you are doing here, i'm telling you straight out. When the bible states "Adam was not deceived" and then you try to find a reason that he WAS deceived, you are manipulating the truth to your own narrative. Thats not a good thing. Thats exactly what is going on all around us in the world today. A man can be a woman. The fundamental truth is a man cannot ever be a woman, but when you ask somebody that question quite often you get 'they can if they want to be'. How do they come up with that answer, because they are manipulating truth to a narrative that has been adopted by the woke mob. They have allowed a false narrative to define what truth is and in doing so have enabled themselves to believe a lie. Once a person starts doing that, then really ask yourself, where do they stand regarding any truth if they have already allowed the most basic of truths to be questioned. If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything. I'm not going to fall for that type of logic regarding Adam being deceived when the scriptures are quite clear. A man is a man always, a woman is a woman always, and Adam was NOT deceived by any lie that was brought forth by Satan, or Eve. Look at the bold part of what you said I highlighted above. Now look at the scripture.

". . Adam was not deceived..." (1Ti 2:14)
 

Carl

Well-known member
Carl, I'm not gonna lie, that is some scary stuff you are doing here, i'm telling you straight out. When the bible states "Adam was not deceived" and then you try to find a reason that he WAS deceived, you are manipulating the truth to your own narrative. Thats not a good thing. Thats exactly what is going on all around us in the world today. A man can be a woman. The fundamental truth is a man cannot ever be a woman, but when you ask somebody that question quite often you get 'they can if they want to be'. How do they come up with that answer, because they are manipulating truth to a narrative that has been adopted by the woke mob. They have allowed a false narrative to define what truth is and in doing so have enabled themselves to believe a lie. Once a person starts doing that, then really ask yourself, where do they stand regarding any truth if they have already allowed the most basic of truths to be questioned. If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything. I'm not going to fall for that type of logic regarding Adam being deceived when the scriptures are quite clear. A man is a man always, a woman is a woman always, and Adam was NOT deceived by any lie that was brought forth by Satan, or Eve. Look at the bold part of what you said I highlighted above. Now look at the scripture.

". . Adam was not deceived..." (1Ti 2:14)
I disagree with your opinion, and I've explained why 6 ways from Sunday. You can choose to have another understanding, but please don't claim I'm manipulating the truth! Either Adam was deceived or he ate the fruit knowing was going to die. I believe Paul was referring to Eve's being deceived by Satan, not Adam... who wasn't the one deceived by Satan. You have your view, and I'm entitled to mine.

This is what turns many people off from Bible discussions... the I'm right, you're wrong mentality you're displaying here. I'm not claiming to be right, but I'm not convinced you are either. The fact is, the Bible has some topics that seem to contradict others. I pointed out a few. One is Jephthah. We're told Jehovah doesn't condone human sacrifice, yet Jephthah devotes his daughter to be a "burnt offering." Which is it? I believe he devoted his daughter to the Temple the same way Hannah devoted Samuel, but I can't prove it.
 

Carl

Well-known member
I love this forum because of our shared faith in Jehovah. I especially enjoy the debates because they force me to think, and dig into the Scriptures. I've changed my opinion when a better argument is raised, but I don't bend to peer pressure. I don't care if everyone on the forum believes I'm wrong about Adam. My faith isn't about consensus. I'm here because I agree with the vast majority of Robert's work.
 

Summit

Well-known member
I disagree with your opinion, and I've explained why 6 ways from Sunday. You can choose to have another understanding, but please don't claim I'm manipulating the truth! Either Adam was deceived or he ate the fruit knowing was going to die. I believe Paul was referring to Eve's being deceived by Satan, not Adam... who wasn't the one deceived by Satan. You have your view, and I'm entitled to mine.

This is what turns many people off from Bible discussions... the I'm right, you're wrong mentality you're displaying here. I'm not claiming to be right, but I'm not convinced you are either. The fact is, the Bible has some topics that seem to contradict others. I pointed out a few. One is Jephthah. We're told Jehovah doesn't condone human sacrifice, yet Jephthah devotes his daughter to be a "burnt offering." Which is it? I believe he devoted his daughter to the Temple the same way Hannah devoted Samuel, but I can't prove it.
First lets realize that what I am saying is certainly not an opinion. An opinion is something that is based on a point of view, not necessarily a fact. Yes, the bible is full of teachings that can be taken a number of ways, but there are many things that are point blank. God is Love. Many people who don't believe that have their own opinion don't they? Yet the fact is God is Love. Jesus is the firstborn of God. Yet to those who don't believe they have their own opinion. There is a saying about opinions but I won't use it here...lets just say everybody has one. So does that mean everything must just be opinion Carl? The problem with that type of logic is that opinions often change when somebody presents a better theory.
When the bible states that "...Adam was not deceived" that is not an opinion. Ok, maybe he was a little deceived right? I mean just an iota of disbelief was there. In Adams opinion, maybe it was safe to eat the fruit? After all Eve was still alive, right? If you believe any of that then you invalidate the scripture that says "...Adam was NOT deceived...".

Your faith obviously shouldn't be about consensus, but when you question a simple truth from the scriptures, there is something else at play. Carl, I have read many of your other comments on other threads, and even though I don't know you, you have given the forum insight into your life and those around you consistently enough to say I feel like I do kinda know you. I'm going out on a limb here, and I sincerely apologize if I am overstepping, but you have posted so much regarding your relationship with your family. Maybe if you stood more for truth instead of questioning everything, your son would see that too. How do you expect to make him see what you believe when you don't even know what it is you believe in?
 
Last edited:

Medi-tator

Well-known member
I love this forum because of our shared faith in Jehovah. I especially enjoy the debates because they force me to think, and dig into the Scriptures. I've changed my opinion when a better argument is raised, but I don't bend to peer pressure. I don't care if everyone on the forum believes I'm wrong about Adam. My faith isn't about consensus. I'm here because I agree with the vast majority of Robert's work.
What you say here Carl is your beautiful truth. I have personally witnessed you time after time be very reasonable in your dealings with some and I have seen your flexibility (again, very reasonable) when items of interest are pointed out to you to the degree that you make adjustments to your thinking. I find you an excellent example of someone who is firm in their own personal beliefs but not ultra-stuck to them just for the sake of personal ambition or pride. I totally appreciate that about you and thank you for all your massive insights here on this forum. I also enjoy the privilege you extend to me and others to disagree with you on some of your points, thank you.

I have read with some (but not a ton of) interest your current exchange with @Summit and have decided not to get too involved in it with you guys. I am leaning a bit toward Summit's reasoning but truly love your statement as seen above "but I don't bend to peer pressure" and another "My faith isn't about consensus". I would not have it any other way in my limited opinion.
 

Summit

Well-known member
What you say here Carl is your beautiful truth. I have personally witnessed you time after time be very reasonable in your dealings with some and I have seen your flexibility (again, very reasonable) when items of interest are pointed out to you to the degree that you make adjustments to your thinking. I find you an excellent example of someone who is firm in their own personal beliefs but not ultra-stuck to them just for the sake of personal ambition or pride. I totally appreciate that about you and thank you for all your massive insights here on this forum. I also enjoy the privilege you extend to me and others to disagree with you on some of your points, thank you.

I have read with some (but not a ton of) interest your current exchange with @Summit and have decided not to get too involved in it with you guys. I am leaning a bit toward Summit's reasoning but truly love your statement as seen above "but I don't bend to peer pressure" and another "My faith isn't about consensus". I would not have it any other way in my limited opinion.
Nicely said Meditator
 

Carl

Well-known member
First lets realize that what I am saying is certainly not an opinion. An opinion is something that is based on a point of view, not necessarily a fact. Yes, the bible is full of teachings that can be taken a number of ways, but there are many things that are point blank. God is Love. Many people who don't believe that have their own opinion don't they? Yet the fact is God is Love. Jesus is the firstborn of God. Yet to those who don't believe they have their own opinion. There is a saying about opinions but I won't use it here...lets just say everybody has one. So does that mean everything must just be opinion Carl? The problem with that type of logic is that opinions often change when somebody presents a better theory.
When the bible states that "...Adam was not deceived" that is not an opinion. Ok, maybe he was a little deceived right? I mean just an iota of disbelief was there. In Adams opinion, maybe it was safe to eat the fruit? After all Eve was still alive, right? If you believe any of that then you invalidate the scripture that says "...Adam was NOT deceived...".

Your faith obviously shouldn't be about consensus, but when you question a simple truth from the scriptures, there is something else at play. Carl, I have read many of your other comments on other threads, and even though I don't know you, you have given the forum insight into your life and those around you consistently enough to say I feel like I do kinda know you. I'm going out on a limb here, and I sincerely apologize if I am overstepping, but you have posted so much regarding your relationship with your family. Maybe if you stood more for truth instead of questioning everything, your son would see that too. How do you expect to make him see what you believe when you don't even know what it is you believe in?
Conjecture... opinion... potato... potatoe... whatever you want to call it is fine. You and I disagree with what we believe Paul was thinking. So basically it boils down to whether or not Adam ate the fruit knowing he was going to die. If he wasn't deceived as you believe, then he ate it knowing he was going to die. I believe Paul was saying he wasn't deceived into eating it by Satan, but there's no mention of Eve's deception. We can agree to disagree.
 

Carl

Well-known member
I'm not trying to beat a dead horse, but I decided to re-read every verse that mentions Adam. First, I see no definite statement from the Bible saying he won't be resurrected. Many assume he won't since he was perfect, but if I'm going to be honest with myself, if it's not clearly stated in the Bible... then it's someone's or some group's opinion. I want to deal with facts. Second, Paul was known to interject his opinion in his writings. So when he said:

1 Timothy 2:11-15 "Let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man, but she is to remain silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. Also, Adam was not deceived, but the woman was thoroughly deceived and became a transgressor. However, she will be kept safe through childbearing, provided she continues in faith and love and holiness along with soundness of mind."

When Paul said "I do not permit a woman to speak," was this inspired or was he speaking for himself? If this was from Jehovah, then why are women allowed to speak in Kingdom Halls today? We can't have it both ways, either this was a command from Jehovah, or it was Paul speaking for himself, which is something he did elsewhere in the Bible. If we're going to take his every word as literally from Jehovah, then women shouldn't be allowed to talk in KHs. He was obviously interjecting his opinion... hence the use of "I" and not "God."

Personally, I believe Paul was a ting anti-female for whatever reason. When I read the above verses, to me he's blaming Eve for being deceived, not Adam, and using that as a justification to believe women aren't worthy of being heard in church. I don't think he's inspired here. I've heard men blame Eve for mankind's downfall, which makes me wonder how many women have suffered abuse as a result of this mentality. I love Paul and so I'm not judging him or claiming he wasn't inspired elsewhere. I just know for a fact he admitted to putting his personal opinion into his writings at times. This is one instance I believe he could be doing this. Therefore, I rely on critical thinking skills. If we're supposed to take one verse, "Adam was not deceived," and take it at face value without viewing it in the context of what Paul's previous words said... then we have to do the same about Jephthah and other verses. We can't pick and choose when the Bible is literal and when it requires critical thinking.
 

MickHewitt

Well-known member
I'm not trying to beat a dead horse, but I decided to re-read every verse that mentions Adam. First, I see no definite statement from the Bible saying he won't be resurrected. Many assume he won't since he was perfect, but if I'm going to be honest with myself, if it's not clearly stated in the Bible... then it's someone's or some group's opinion. I want to deal with facts. Second, Paul was known to interject his opinion in his writings. So when he said:

1 Timothy 2:11-15 "Let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness. I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man, but she is to remain silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve. Also, Adam was not deceived, but the woman was thoroughly deceived and became a transgressor. However, she will be kept safe through childbearing, provided she continues in faith and love and holiness along with soundness of mind."

When Paul said "I do not permit a woman to speak," was this inspired or was he speaking for himself? If this was from Jehovah, then why are women allowed to speak in Kingdom Halls today? We can't have it both ways, either this was a command from Jehovah, or it was Paul speaking for himself, which is something he did elsewhere in the Bible. If we're going to take his every word as literally from Jehovah, then women shouldn't be allowed to talk in KHs. He was obviously interjecting his opinion... hence the use of "I" and not "God."

Personally, I believe Paul was a ting anti-female for whatever reason. When I read the above verses, to me he's blaming Eve for being deceived, not Adam, and using that as a justification to believe women aren't worthy of being heard in church. I don't think he's inspired here. I've heard men blame Eve for mankind's downfall, which makes me wonder how many women have suffered abuse as a result of this mentality? I love Paul and so I'm not judging him or claiming he wasn't inspired elsewhere. I just know for a fact he admitted to putting his personal opinion into his writings at times. This is one instance I believe he could be doing this. Therefore, I rely on critical thinking skills. If we're supposed to take one verse, "Adam was not deceived," and take it at face value without viewing it in the context of what Paul's previous words said... then we have to do the same about Jephthah and other verses. We can't pick and choose when the Bible is literal and when it requires critical thinking.
Wow lovely brother you must be a Beroean!
 
Top