Rothchilds Economist Magazine

At least, Mick had his beard prior to receiving permission from the GB.
Truth be told, we're thinking that perhaps the desires and influence of some GB members to sport a beards was instrumental in the "united" decision to "allow" beards in the first place.
As quickly as some of them appeared with full beards after the go-ahead was given, it makes one wonder if they had already been secretly growing them knowing the decision that would be forthcoming.:cautious:


Mick, you have the look of an English professor straight out of Oxford. Looking good. :)

You are looking good, man. You look like that rocker in Smashing PumpkinView attachment 9305
If Jehovah hasn't blessed us enough with the five senses He blesses us with another. A sense of
humour. Chortle
 
This annoying tremor has got me pressing keys where I shouldn't. Phoning wrong numbers. Please bare with me. I will have to switch to voice text.
Ya queda menos querido! Gracias por permanecer con nosotros pese a los esfuerzos! Qué corage el tuyo! Te mandamos un gran abrazo! Oramos siempre por ti. Te queremos Mick. Aguante mi hermano! 😍
 
When this economist cover page came out I wondered if America (as the 7th head with the mortal head wound) would recover with Trump as sitting president and all people looking with admiration at him as a King over earth's affairs. I guess it could still work out that way. I also viewed him as the king with fierce countenance.
Haha! His police mugshot (🙄🙄🙄) sure had a fierce countenance 😅 Honestly, who needs to pay to watch the soap operas on TV when we can watch this one playing out for free?!
 
eventually I think all threads merge into one. Worf could not embarrass his Russian parents because they loved him so. My brother is ashamed of our heritage but we are 1/10 Russian if my math is right. I wondered what this time would look like when I woke up. Fifteen is not the best age to wake up to. It wasn't my choice. My brother hates Russia and we can't even talk about it without a fistfight almost happening. I've never been in a fight with my brother and I don't want to be. I've seen him fight and he would mop the floor with me. I can't even talk to him about our extended family who live in Russia. I need some Jehovah's Witnesseses to call on my brother and knock on his door until he caves. I know its not exactly the TRUTH but it's close enough.
 
“Less talk. More synthehol” You can almost feel the deep and searching mental strain upon the scriptwriter to give birth to that line. It surely must be one of the most profound statements ever produced in production of a play: A glassy eyed Robot, a guy with brass fencing around his eyes so that he’s completely blind, and a Klingon who lost a one hundred round fight with Mohammed Ali, walk into a bar. The barman says: “Wh….”, the Klingon says: “Lessh tok, more shinfersol…..”
 
eventually I think all threads merge into one. Worf could not embarrass his Russian parents because they loved him so. My brother is ashamed of our heritage but we are 1/10 Russian if my math is right. I wondered what this time would look like when I woke up. Fifteen is not the best age to wake up to. It wasn't my choice. My brother hates Russia and we can't even talk about it without a fistfight almost happening. I've never been in a fight with my brother and I don't want to be. I've seen him fight and he would mop the floor with me. I can't even talk to him about our extended family who live in Russia. I need some Jehovah's Witnesseses to call on my brother and knock on his door until he caves. I know its not exactly the TRUTH but it's close enough.
Is it all the anti Putin sentiment that has caused his hatred for Russia? Does he proudly hang an Ukraine flag from his front porch as have so many who've fallen victim to the deep state’s narrative and who see Ukraine as “poor victims” of “Russian aggression” without bothering to learn the facts?
Reasoning with him in the current political climate is probably a bridge too far since anti Russian sentiment is in vogue.
Hope he comes around to reason.
 
Is it all the anti Putin sentiment that has caused his hatred for Russia? Does he proudly hang an Ukraine flag from his front porch as have so many who've fallen victim to the deep state’s narrative and who see Ukraine as “poor victims” of “Russian aggression” without bothering to learn the facts?
Reasoning with him in the current political climate is probably a bridge too far since anti Russian sentiment is in vogue.
Hope he comes around to reason.
I can not tell you what happened to my brother. I really don't know. We were separated when I was 8 and while we both hated that fact, I realize that I was being culled away from his influence. I was the younger and my brother took on our father's traits. I was raised by our stepfather who had a different outlook on life. I was never really hateful toward any one peoples. I thank my dad for that. Stepdad. I really don't know how two brothers can end up so different and apart. I love my brother but I am not him and he is not me to be sure. If I live one day past Armageddon I will probably not see anyone related to me. That bothers me.
 
I can not tell you what happened to my brother. I really don't know. We were separated when I was 8 and while we both hated that fact, I realize that I was being culled away from his influence. I was the younger and my brother took on our father's traits. I was raised by our stepfather who had a different outlook on life. I was never really hateful toward any one peoples. I thank my dad for that. Stepdad. I really don't know how two brothers can end up so different and apart. I love my brother but I am not him and he is not me to be sure. If I live one day past Armageddon I will probably not see anyone related to me. That bothers me.
Thanks for the insight, Bill. Many in my family aren't ready for the truth at present. I think once those walls, people build around themselves, get knocked down at systems collapse, many will be a lot more receptive to what we know and hopefully move in the right direction.
 
Thanks for that J&P You know when talking of Am ha haretts the people of the soil. When watching the take off of Dubtown don't know if you ever indulged but the accent of the gullible witnesses was the accent of my Birmingham birth right. We are in the U.K deemed as least employable due to our accent, inbred and dumb" In this video poor young Chad is portrayed with a Birmingham accent: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=youtube dubtown &mid=598116EE7A9379079E0F598116EE7A9379079E0F&ajaxhist=0
That’s sadly true Mick but it’s also true of many other countries, even in America. What is also true is that the collective “working class” have a built-in appreciation of the grist of life and what constitutes true friendship. The “upper class” - that I grew up in, is full of pretence, lies, bitterness, backbiting, betrayal and intrigue. Your friend is not your friend, and your workmate is your betrayer, the work is the lie in achievement and the legacy no more than the ashes of pride. I wish I had spent my life as a carpenter and created something useful, rather than try and fix the detritus of government greed upon an abandoned population.
 
Thanks for the insight, Bill. Many in my family aren't ready for the truth at present. I think once those walls, people build around themselves, get knocked down at systems collapse, many will be a lot more receptive to what we know and hopefully move in the right direction.
I think Jehovah has some preps to get us ready for what he has already warned us against. It is no small thing to be betrayed by one's own family. Jesus did say it would happen so I don't think it a mere story. I guess, until I feel the blade against my neck I won't believe it either but I will keep myself mentally ready. If any of my family who are left betray me I will end them personally out of dignity. I have a nephew who has never acknowledged God nor Jesus. If he leaves me be I will let him be but I have a feeling it won't be like that. Satan isn't content to let us be like that. Brothers and sisters be warned and awake.
 
Give us a while to get round speech recognition: A multitude of commands but it's a good work around. Always a way out!
I could use de keyboard like a concert pianist! it's a shame really I learned to type back in the days when Morse Code was still the way to communicate aboard ship. It was still the days before encrypted satellite communications and we still used the old Nazi way of coding by morse sent in alpha numeric groups of five. High speed morse had to be typed quickly S so being the top in my class at typing and reading morse I was put into NATO which was being run by ex Nazi's 'Operation Gladio' LaRouche files will give you the background. I didn't know this until I met Robert online. I've learned so much since meeting him. Also I have learned the Christ through the bro's and sisters here. Their attitude has humbled me. The thing about knowledge is that as the scriptures say it 'puffs one up'....Interestingly when Peter gave advice in his second letter of supplying to your virtue knowledge after supplying knowledge he said apply 'Self Control'... Jah bless Windows 11 speech recognition! Especially it's recognition of my Brummie accent!
 
I could use de keyboard like a concert pianist! it's a shame really I learned to type back in the days when Morse Code was still the way to communicate aboard ship. It was still the days before encrypted satellite communications and we still used the old Nazi way of coding by morse sent in alpha numeric groups of five. High speed morse had to be typed quickly S so being the top in my class at typing and reading morse I was put into NATO which was being run by ex Nazi's 'Operation Gladio' LaRouche files will give you the background. I didn't know this until I met Robert online. I've learned so much since meeting him. Also I have learned the Christ through the bro's and sisters here. Their attitude has humbled me. The thing about knowledge is that as the scriptures say it 'puffs one up'....Interestingly when Peter gave advice in his second letter of supplying to your virtue knowledge after supplying knowledge he said apply 'Self Control'... Jah bless Windows 11 speech recognition! Especially it's recognition of my Brummie accent!
This affliction has turned out a blessing! Once I have mastered this voice app I will be able to sit with my large print bible on my lap and thanks to Jehovah's watchman's tools I will be able to discuss the wonderful truths found as I go from passage to passage. Jehovah and Christ are great!
 
I love the original Star Wars, but do you know the link between Gene Rodenberry and Jack Parsons? Nothing is as it seems it seems. LOL. But all the Star Trek shows all the way up to and including Enterprise are fantastic. After that, this new Star Trek is pure woke demonic garbage. I had never watched Deep Space 9 until I think last year or the year before, and that was excellent too. And like Barnaby mentioned, I'm at that age now when all the old shows and movies I watched a while ago, I don't remember them any way, so I can watch them all over again. :p
I found it messianic in the way Trip gave his life for his crew in Star Trek Enterprise? I found it sad the writers did not give much recourse to his demise? It was lovely the way he gave Archer the thumbs up in his last moments! Pray we do that to our captain in our last.
 
Last edited:
Talk about predictive programming
What a coincidence ….this photo was posted on the NFL Facebook page on September 4, 2025 it is the official NFL poster leading up to Superbowl 60. Out of 32 quarterbacks in the NFL what are the chances that the two quarterbacks Maye and Darnhold who made it to Superbowl 60 are right up front together leading the way to Levi stadium where Superbowl 60 will take place.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0794.jpeg
    IMG_0794.jpeg
    617.9 KB · Views: 134
  • IMG_0783.jpeg
    IMG_0783.jpeg
    290.5 KB · Views: 127
Talk about predictive programming
What a coincidence ….this photo was posted on the NFL Facebook page on September 4, 2025 it is the official NFL poster leading up to Superbowl 60. Out of 32 quarterbacks in the NFL what are the chances that the two quarterbacks Maye and Darnhold who made it to Superbowl 60 are right up front together leading the way to Levi stadium where Superbowl 60 will take place.
I gave up caring about sports when the far leftist politics entered into it several years ago. The kneeling with Colin Kaepernick did it for me, and it went south from there. It seems like the NFL is really just a form of a prison yard. The only difference is the pay.
 
I gave up caring about sports when the far leftist politics entered into it several years ago. The kneeling with Colin Kaepernick did it for me, and it went south from there. It seems like the NFL is really just a form of a prison yard. The only difference is the pay.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0797.jpeg
    IMG_0797.jpeg
    165.5 KB · Views: 138
  • IMG_0796.jpeg
    IMG_0796.jpeg
    281 KB · Views: 137
I was raised on the Enterprise! Love Star Trek to this day and yes I remember the way Kirk would win every episode. Only the new crew members would be zapped by the aliens. I have only just started asking AI things I will try the Kirk questioning test it's calm!
Anyone remember the Star trek episode 'The Ultimate Computer' with the M-5 Component? Interesting comparison with the film 2001 Space Odysee which was aired the same year 1968. I raise the subject because of the paralleled introduction of AI. The M-5 blocked out mans control and assumed autonomy.
 
Last edited:
Latest Economist Magazine

Here is an interesting interpretation 👇

It doesn't look like a cover about the 250th anniversary of the United States.

It looks like a warning.

A country turned into a birthday cake... crowned not by candles, but by matches.
And only one of them is lit.

The first thing that breaks the logic of the image is precisely the matches. At any birthday, there would be candles. Here, no.
The Economist replaces the symbol of celebration with the symbol of fire.
It's not about turning 250 years old. It's about wondering if that anniversary could become the start of something much more dangerous.
That match isn't just lit.
It's starting to burn away and leaves a column of smoke rising slowly.
We're not seeing an explosion, but the instant before it.
The Economist seems to suggest that the process has already begun, even though it's still not visible to most people.
The most unsettling detail appears precisely in that matchstick.
If observed closely, the charred relief resembles the profile of Donald Trump's face.
It doesn't seem like a design accident. It gives the impression that The Economist wants to identify that spark with his figure and with the new American political cycle.

But it also opens another possibility: that Trump is not the final destination of the story, but merely the instrument that sets the process in motion
And here emerges a second reading that is even more unsettling.

The match serves a very specific function: to light the fire.
Afterward, it ceases to be necessary.
Once consumed, it disappears.
If that match represents Trump, the cover might be suggesting that his role consists of initiating a much greater transformation and that, once the political, social, or institutional combustion has been ignited, his own figure might become expendable to make way for a new stage, another government, or even another model of power.
He would not be the final objective, but the sacrificial piece that activates the change.
The completely clean blue background is also significant.
There is no smoke, no chaos, no war around.
Everything seems calm.
It is an almost advertising-like calm that contrasts with the fire that has just appeared.
As if the real danger were not the visible fire, but the one that begins while the majority continues to celebrate.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1714.jpeg
    IMG_1714.jpeg
    178.3 KB · Views: 104
  • IMG_1717.jpeg
    IMG_1717.jpeg
    577.8 KB · Views: 102
  • IMG_0255.jpeg
    IMG_0255.jpeg
    318.8 KB · Views: 90
  • IMG_1718.jpeg
    IMG_1718.jpeg
    112.4 KB · Views: 96
  • IMG_1719.jpeg
    IMG_1719.jpeg
    188.3 KB · Views: 105
Latest Economist Magazine

Here is an interesting interpretation 👇

It doesn't look like a cover about the 250th anniversary of the United States.

It looks like a warning.

A country turned into a birthday cake... crowned not by candles, but by matches.
And only one of them is lit.

The first thing that breaks the logic of the image is precisely the matches. At any birthday, there would be candles. Here, no.
The Economist replaces the symbol of celebration with the symbol of fire.
It's not about turning 250 years old. It's about wondering if that anniversary could become the start of something much more dangerous.
That match isn't just lit.
It's starting to burn away and leaves a column of smoke rising slowly.
We're not seeing an explosion, but the instant before it.
The Economist seems to suggest that the process has already begun, even though it's still not visible to most people.
The most unsettling detail appears precisely in that matchstick.
If observed closely, the charred relief resembles the profile of Donald Trump's face.
It doesn't seem like a design accident. It gives the impression that The Economist wants to identify that spark with his figure and with the new American political cycle.

But it also opens another possibility: that Trump is not the final destination of the story, but merely the instrument that sets the process in motion
And here emerges a second reading that is even more unsettling.

The match serves a very specific function: to light the fire.
Afterward, it ceases to be necessary.
Once consumed, it disappears.
If that match represents Trump, the cover might be suggesting that his role consists of initiating a much greater transformation and that, once the political, social, or institutional combustion has been ignited, his own figure might become expendable to make way for a new stage, another government, or even another model of power.
He would not be the final objective, but the sacrificial piece that activates the change.
The completely clean blue background is also significant.
There is no smoke, no chaos, no war around.
Everything seems calm.
It is an almost advertising-like calm that contrasts with the fire that has just appeared.
As if the real danger were not the visible fire, but the one that begins while the majority continues to celebrate.
Revelation of the Method.
 
Latest Economist Magazine

Here is an interesting interpretation 👇

It doesn't look like a cover about the 250th anniversary of the United States.

It looks like a warning.

A country turned into a birthday cake... crowned not by candles, but by matches.
And only one of them is lit.

The first thing that breaks the logic of the image is precisely the matches. At any birthday, there would be candles. Here, no.
The Economist replaces the symbol of celebration with the symbol of fire.
It's not about turning 250 years old. It's about wondering if that anniversary could become the start of something much more dangerous.
That match isn't just lit.
It's starting to burn away and leaves a column of smoke rising slowly.
We're not seeing an explosion, but the instant before it.
The Economist seems to suggest that the process has already begun, even though it's still not visible to most people.
The most unsettling detail appears precisely in that matchstick.
If observed closely, the charred relief resembles the profile of Donald Trump's face.
It doesn't seem like a design accident. It gives the impression that The Economist wants to identify that spark with his figure and with the new American political cycle.

But it also opens another possibility: that Trump is not the final destination of the story, but merely the instrument that sets the process in motion
And here emerges a second reading that is even more unsettling.

The match serves a very specific function: to light the fire.
Afterward, it ceases to be necessary.
Once consumed, it disappears.
If that match represents Trump, the cover might be suggesting that his role consists of initiating a much greater transformation and that, once the political, social, or institutional combustion has been ignited, his own figure might become expendable to make way for a new stage, another government, or even another model of power.
He would not be the final objective, but the sacrificial piece that activates the change.
The completely clean blue background is also significant.
There is no smoke, no chaos, no war around.
Everything seems calm.
It is an almost advertising-like calm that contrasts with the fire that has just appeared.
As if the real danger were not the visible fire, but the one that begins while the majority continues to celebrate.
Definitely an Ominous message coming from the Rothschilds Economist magazine. Your so correct on the image of Trump's profile on that burning match. All durring the lead up to the 250 celebration on Fox News they have been stressing the "pride of being an American." I couldn't help but recall the scripture of pride coming before the fall.
 
Top