Very interesting thoughts overall.
In regard to them exhibiting genocidal desires I'm not talking about any of my own experiences today and yesterday just what I observe and what I overhear them say at work or read online it seems essentially loathing of several characteristics 1. People that are hypergamously suboptimal especially on the physical end 2. stable reliable long term men for not appearing to offer a rollercoaster of emotional stimulation this would rather they beat me than bore me mentality 3. Men that are insufficiently aggressive/thuggish and/or less manipulable so insufficiently useful as a proxy weapon and exhibiting less likelihood of offspring being the next warlord.
The first I do not fully understand what you are trying to say but the latter two is exacerbated and primarily caused by the breakdown of the family. Fathers play a role and strong female oriented society means they nurture such beliefs. Of course men have problems too. Daughters would look for men that resemble core traits of their fathers. Emotionally abusive, unavailable, disrespectful, forceful and a combination of all. Because there is an unbreakable connection between parents and their children, it develops into a love/hate relationship where they see negative traits as necessary too.
One test I use to evaluate whether an individual is motivated by a deep eugenic sentiment and revulsion is when I see single women reject a man that's not a creep I'll ask them why they didn't reassure the man by suggesting they might look into setting him up with someone, suggesting so and so might be more receptive or that they'll keep there eyes open for anyone suitable in the future as it seems such a convenient opportunity not only would the person be reducing any fixation the man might have but be establishing a good rapport with utility she can harness down the line as the man feels he owes the woman also and because it sends the message I don't want to reproduce with you but I do want you to reproduce as opposed to what may or may not be but the male's subconcious will interpret as I don't want you to reproduce period.
This is deep and of amazing observation.
Again I believe lot of these are responses to trauma
. The alternative is to accept the world as is which leads into depression and suicide. So they go on the offensive instead. The proper response you are talking about means they have to go against their own jealousy, and the world has embraced the concept of squashing the competition if you want to win(live). They hate themselves, thus their own gender. Why would they help other women?
The women that act as you say they should do exist. Likely they will find a proper partner quickly. It would be rare though. This isn't new as even the bible times say such women are rare and a gem.
Less than 50% of the male population get to have an offspring. This is true throughout history and not just 20/21 century.
I also tell the women they don't have to ever actually help the man or consider themselves obligated to just produce the sentiment in the man's mind you dont want him to be a genetic dead end. Mammals interpret female rejection as being told to go die basically there's a trigger in some species some types of bears are an example where when a threshold is crossed the male animal commits suicide this is interpreted as propagating genes by not consuming resources on an organism that won't reproduce leaving then available in the environment for siblings, cousins, nephews and nieces that carry some of his genes. I don't want to reproduce with you but I do want you to reproduce as opposed to what may or may not be but the male's subconscious will interpret as I don't want you to reproduce period. I also tell the women they don't have to ever actually help the man or consider themselves obligated to just produce the sentiment in the man's mind you don't want him to be a genetic dead end. Mammals interpret female rejection as being told to go die basically there's a trigger in some species some types of bears are an example where when a threshold is crossed the male animal commits suicide this is interpreted as propagating genes by not consuming resources on an organism that won't reproduce leaving then available in the environment for siblings, cousins, nephews and nieces that carry some of his genes. So I observe women's reactions in these conversations where i explain this about manmals and the signals one is sending and I make the suggestion how they could have responded to these men differently because some of them see the logic/utility though it had never occurred to them before while others are revolted by the suggestion of even giving men the impression they might help repulsed at the thought of suboptimal perceived men not being asexual worker drones till death. That the person would forgo increasing allies in their local area just to elevate the odds of people being dead ends. An easy experiment to assess those in your environments character.
Again, very deep and amazing insights. And some of those women would eventually get the point, perhaps too late. How do you know among them are hidden good ones and some that embrace the malice? You can't.
I want to specifically address the bolded point above. The trauma breaks trust with not only the individual that caused the trauma but with every other human being.
I would talk to my dad about people who don't help strangers that are sick and dying and most just pass by them and those that do help are celebrated as heroes. I am pretty sure he said it's dangerous to help a stranger. And he's a JW! Yes that may be the case, but those that really need help you need to go help them. If they end up dying and you had a chance to help them, would it not be on your conscience? I've seen many, many people think the same way. They want nothing to do with them because their trust towards humanity as a whole has been shattered. Ridiculed, mocked, and even attacked for showing kindness.
Maybe one logic in their mind is that if they help the individual maybe he indeed is a creep and you have just invited someone that could be a psychopath in your life. The press is one of the plagues. Many articles say behind the smile there may lie such individuals. So you cannot trust anything or anyone. Solution? Simply ignore them altogether and cut them off as quickly as possible.
Granted women disproportionately utilize knives and poison and largely spare themselves risk and accountability by relying on violence through a male proxy or institution where it is possible for them. It's pretty straightforward outside of men on the majority end of parreto distribution performing much of the necessary work to keep society running many woman would literally prefer those men dead essentially resentful they haven't been killed of by others like humans are supposed to live tournament mating like lions or something in a darwinian sense the hindbrain wants the Gengis Khan genes because if a son becomes the world's next warlord that means more grandchildren. That's why so many of them treasure sodomites because they get the utility of a male associate without them having to concern themselves with them having the intention of breeding with any women.
I mean, I would conclude if I really wanted to hurt as many people as possible, I would methodically plan it out over long periods of time. At the right time, with the right methods, at the right place. Dozens? Child play. 9/11? Are we playing here? It's a blip in the annals of history.
We all have to make a choice. I have to make a choice not to use my knowledge for such ends
. Because I do not want to be like "scientists" such as Mengele. He called himself a Doctor! I believe the greatest regret you'll feel at the end when you are old and feeble is when you look back and you used that strength and passion of yours to hurt others.
This is the difference. It's preferable having someone lash out quickly without much thought. Maybe you are right that they affect it as a whole from a societal point of view.