Basis for Lawsuit
The lawsuits are based on Jehovah’s Witnesses accusing the AEVTJ (
The Spanish Association of Victims of Jehovah’s Witnesses) of
“A series of offensive manifestations” along with the alleged interference in the “right to honor”.
The religious group (WT) find the terms “cult” and “victims” being used against them as offensive and want them to disappear, demanded compensation of €25k and for AEVTJ to display headlines of their loss on their website as an
“unlawful interference” with the Organization’s
“right to honor”. They also demanded that once they complete the above, that AEVTJ’s site, name, and everything involved become
“non-existent, cancelled, eliminated”.
Honor can be understood in many different ways, but reporting, exposing, and acknowledging abuse is not one of them. Instead of any sort of remorse or apology on how these victims were treated, victims are being sued and blamed for how they are reacting.
Below are the two (2) main reasons the Jehovah’s Witnesses initiated these lawsuits in the first place. They claim that identifying them as a
“A Cult” and the Spanish Association identifying itself as
“The victims” is bringing dishonor to the religious group’s “good name”.
The December 14th 2023 trial, is being reviewed here, along with the press conference on December 18th, 2023.
A cult:
Court Magistrate Raquel Chacon concluded that Jehovah’s Witnesses were a cult in a trial that had 12 Jehovah’s Witnesses on one side, and 12 former Jehovah’s Witnesses survivors with the AEVTJ on the other side.
Despite Jehovah’s Witnesses testifying that the Spanish association
“foster hatred, discrimination and unjustified prejudice against the religious minority of Jehovah’s Witnesses” calling the entire idea “
scandalous”, the Judge did not agree.
Judge Chacon said that the organization is “
a destructive cult” and a “
closed community of spiritual nature, guided by a leader who exercises charismatic power over his followers.”
She acquitted the AEVTJ of all charges.
The Judge said the cult is
“to be considered in our days as exhibiting excessive control over the lives of the faithful” that it has been revealed as
“a strict hierarchical system”.
The Ruling:
The case included some fifteen former Jehovah’s Witnesses being heard in person, and more than seventy more being heard via recordings.
The victims of Jehovah’s Witnesses spoke about the separate unofficial system of Justice operating under the seams of the cult. The victims described the psychological and emotional damage that this parallel legal system has deeply and adversely affected their lives.
The victims at the trial, bursting into tears, remembering the abuse they went through, described the strict degrees of shunning they experienced:
- The breaking up of families
- isolation from society
- prohibition of celebrating any holidays
- the consequences for allowing the cult to control their decisions on blood transfusions.
Prohibiting the term “Victims”, as these former members describe themselves, would be an unjustified censorship for these people who freely express their opinion based on first person experience.
The ruling in this case now protects the freedom of expression of former members of Jehovah’s Witnesses whose freedom of expression allows them to be identified as “victims.”