Like I said, I understand why people think this way. Some of what he's done makes no sense what so ever, like him saying "are we still talking about Epstein" when he was asked about it when this all really blew up. He sure made himself look very guilty, and if you had been on here when that all happened, you would have seen I said that.
I am well aware, but those interpretations need to be based on what we know to be true about God. For example, God's Government is or would have been a world government, and Satan has always been trying to mimic that, just like he wanted to be worshiped, he wants a world wide government. That is the Globalists! And the only obstacle to that, to their One World Order, is the US! The US has to be destroyed, and that's what the whole rivalry in the Book of Daniel is about, and the rise of the 8Th King, which is symbolized by the completed image in Daniel. And this involves Satan's challenge to God's sovereignty, and this "pushing" is related to that! In fact, I believe Trump is going to provoke them into starting the GT, but not until we have gotten into a full blown World War, and then Trump's "Board of Peace" will broker a deal, for "peace" and then for what ever reason the Globalists blow him up, which I suspect will involve wiping out his whole cabinet, and some kind of reorganization under some Continuity of Government plan they already have in place, which gives rise to the 8th King.
And I have said many times about things I believe, "I could be wrong!!" But until I see some evidence in line with what I know to be true about the Bible, and not just what I think is going to happen with prophecy, this is my position! But the truth is, I would not be surprised if we are wrong about most things we think we understand. Jesus Apostles were wrong about everything they thought was going to happen! And I do NOT think I am better or know more than they did! The only advantage we have is the completed Bible, and those very same Apostles refined understanding recorded in the Bible. But once again, like you said, that is still "open for interpretation."
So you are welcome to disagree, and you'd be wrong to think that offends me!