Ireneo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2021
- Messages
- 381
- Reaction score
- 2,217
Hello I will tell you how the story continues
A few days ago something diabolical happened to me
The elders of my congregation gave me a "loyalty test"
They gave me a letter to read in front of the brothers that encouraged them to get vaccinated
I had 5 minutes to do it
It was horrible pressure
I remembered Daniel and how they tried to catch him by putting him against God
I felt that if I read it I would become an idolater
I felt exactly the same as I felt at school 30 years ago
When I just started studying
They put me in front of the flag and asked me to sing the anthem
I refused but they started yelling at me
I felt that I would betray God and I stood my ground and I didn't.
This was the same for 30 years that I did not feel the pressure to idolatry
I told them I wouldn't do it as a matter of conscience
I'm not going to tell my brothers to get vaccinated
Be exposed since in report 10 brother Morris says "you have to get vaccinated"
It was a trap to expose me and catch me
It is clear that I disagree with the GB, there was no way out
Then I got to thinking why I felt like I would be an idol if I did that
I understood in a new way all this
The GB is demanding worship
It is undeniable is what I felt
It's a matter of faith
The brothers have fallen into idolatry
I remembered the Catholics who carry images
They are not necessarily bad and they think they worship God
But they adore him "through the image"
And if we criticize the image they get angry
GB supporters do the same
They attack whoever dares to disobey the gb
They worship God through him
I understood it in a new way
They told me that they would meet me to speak again 2 elders
At the meeting I decided to attack the matter intelligently
Make an argument they couldn't refute
I want to mention them because it was tested on the "battlefield" and they couldn't refute it
I base myself on the "neutrality" argument
I told them that the organization has been neutral in medical treatment for 70 years
This is based on not being master over anyone's faith and respecting individual rights
I told them that I have decided not to vaccinate
But I respect the decision of each one in this
My public position is not to recommend vaccination nor not vaccination
One thing or another
It is one thing to give information but another to recommend.
So I wouldn't push anyone to get vaccinated or not to get vaccinated
They tried to use fallacies and accuse me that my refusal was for not getting vaccinated
but they couldn't because I talked about neutrality
I want to maintain neutrality, I said
And I said that in report 10 the organization abandoned neutrality
they turned green
But I explained
Telling the brothers "get vaccinated" is taking sides
To take sides is to leave neutrality
I did not change, I am the same as 30 years ago
The organization changed
They had to admit
then i said
we are facing a doctrinal change
a new light
The brothers will now recommend vaccination
Before report 10, if someone did it, we corrected them for not being neutral.
After report 10 that changed
I asked them
What is the basis for doctrinal change?
Why was the neutral stance abandoned on medical issues?
They had to admit that no arguments were provided
So they told me that I should accept it because sometimes illogical things are said and they read me the watchtower
They said we don't have all the data
I told them no
that doesn't apply
The GB when making DOCTRINAL decisions is based on the bible
An ADMINISTRATIVE decision is not the same as a DOCTRINAL decision
the GB cannot make a decision and say
"the decision was based on the bible but I can't show you the biblical arguments that support it"
The bible that I have is the same as the GB
So I want the arguments on which the "new light" is based.
An elder must adhere "to the faithful word when teaching"
The GB is obliged to show me the biblical arguments to rule out vaccine neutrality
They accused me of mistrusting the GB and trying to understand
I said I can't understand what I don't know
I'm not stupid they just didn't show the argument why I should abandon neutrality
I just don't know why now I have to be partisan on a controversial issue
So my position will be neutrality until they show me the opposite with the bible.
My bible-educated conscience tells me to be neutral
They got very upset and scheduled a meeting with all the elders with me.
I think they want to destroy me
The key is to make the following clear
Neutrality in medical matters is biblical
It has been our position for decades
If it changes it is a doctrinal change
The GB is obliged to substantiate the doctrinal change with the bible
If you don't show it I'm not obligated to change
You have to hold on to that like a bulldog and don't let go until they bleed out.
They try to use fallacies that accuse us of bad motivations, apostasy, distrust, being anti-vaccine, etc.
But if one clings to neutrality they lose the debate
I wanted to share it with you maybe it will help you
They cannot even destroy neutrality by claiming that governments ask for it
Christ said "give Caesar's to Caesar and God's to God."
If God asks for neutrality, it doesn't matter what the government says.
The neutrality argument is indestructible
I tell you in case you have to face "the loyalty test"
Satan doesn't change
The one who did not light incense in front of the altar to the emperor ended up eaten by the beasts
A few days ago something diabolical happened to me
The elders of my congregation gave me a "loyalty test"
They gave me a letter to read in front of the brothers that encouraged them to get vaccinated
I had 5 minutes to do it
It was horrible pressure
I remembered Daniel and how they tried to catch him by putting him against God
I felt that if I read it I would become an idolater
I felt exactly the same as I felt at school 30 years ago
When I just started studying
They put me in front of the flag and asked me to sing the anthem
I refused but they started yelling at me
I felt that I would betray God and I stood my ground and I didn't.
This was the same for 30 years that I did not feel the pressure to idolatry
I told them I wouldn't do it as a matter of conscience
I'm not going to tell my brothers to get vaccinated
Be exposed since in report 10 brother Morris says "you have to get vaccinated"
It was a trap to expose me and catch me
It is clear that I disagree with the GB, there was no way out
Then I got to thinking why I felt like I would be an idol if I did that
I understood in a new way all this
The GB is demanding worship
It is undeniable is what I felt
It's a matter of faith
The brothers have fallen into idolatry
I remembered the Catholics who carry images
They are not necessarily bad and they think they worship God
But they adore him "through the image"
And if we criticize the image they get angry
GB supporters do the same
They attack whoever dares to disobey the gb
They worship God through him
I understood it in a new way
They told me that they would meet me to speak again 2 elders
At the meeting I decided to attack the matter intelligently
Make an argument they couldn't refute
I want to mention them because it was tested on the "battlefield" and they couldn't refute it
I base myself on the "neutrality" argument
I told them that the organization has been neutral in medical treatment for 70 years
This is based on not being master over anyone's faith and respecting individual rights
I told them that I have decided not to vaccinate
But I respect the decision of each one in this
My public position is not to recommend vaccination nor not vaccination
One thing or another
It is one thing to give information but another to recommend.
So I wouldn't push anyone to get vaccinated or not to get vaccinated
They tried to use fallacies and accuse me that my refusal was for not getting vaccinated
but they couldn't because I talked about neutrality
I want to maintain neutrality, I said
And I said that in report 10 the organization abandoned neutrality
they turned green
But I explained
Telling the brothers "get vaccinated" is taking sides
To take sides is to leave neutrality
I did not change, I am the same as 30 years ago
The organization changed
They had to admit
then i said
we are facing a doctrinal change
a new light
The brothers will now recommend vaccination
Before report 10, if someone did it, we corrected them for not being neutral.
After report 10 that changed
I asked them
What is the basis for doctrinal change?
Why was the neutral stance abandoned on medical issues?
They had to admit that no arguments were provided
So they told me that I should accept it because sometimes illogical things are said and they read me the watchtower
They said we don't have all the data
I told them no
that doesn't apply
The GB when making DOCTRINAL decisions is based on the bible
An ADMINISTRATIVE decision is not the same as a DOCTRINAL decision
the GB cannot make a decision and say
"the decision was based on the bible but I can't show you the biblical arguments that support it"
The bible that I have is the same as the GB
So I want the arguments on which the "new light" is based.
An elder must adhere "to the faithful word when teaching"
The GB is obliged to show me the biblical arguments to rule out vaccine neutrality
They accused me of mistrusting the GB and trying to understand
I said I can't understand what I don't know
I'm not stupid they just didn't show the argument why I should abandon neutrality
I just don't know why now I have to be partisan on a controversial issue
So my position will be neutrality until they show me the opposite with the bible.
My bible-educated conscience tells me to be neutral
They got very upset and scheduled a meeting with all the elders with me.
I think they want to destroy me
The key is to make the following clear
Neutrality in medical matters is biblical
It has been our position for decades
If it changes it is a doctrinal change
The GB is obliged to substantiate the doctrinal change with the bible
If you don't show it I'm not obligated to change
You have to hold on to that like a bulldog and don't let go until they bleed out.
They try to use fallacies that accuse us of bad motivations, apostasy, distrust, being anti-vaccine, etc.
But if one clings to neutrality they lose the debate
I wanted to share it with you maybe it will help you
They cannot even destroy neutrality by claiming that governments ask for it
Christ said "give Caesar's to Caesar and God's to God."
If God asks for neutrality, it doesn't matter what the government says.
The neutrality argument is indestructible
I tell you in case you have to face "the loyalty test"
Satan doesn't change
The one who did not light incense in front of the altar to the emperor ended up eaten by the beasts
Last edited: