The Watchtower's environmentalism and King Charles' new world order

King Charles has stolen one-third of the wealth on this planet,
"101 companies listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) most of them British have mining operations in 37 sub-Saharan African countries. They collectively control over $1 trillion worth of Aftrica's most valuable resources. The UK government has used it's power and influence to ensure that British mining companies have access to Africa's raw materials. This was the case during the colonial period and is stil the case today" Also HSBC, Coutt's banks caught money laundering out of the Off Shore facilities Cayman, Virgin Islands to mention a few run by the Crown amassing huge profit from drug crime! HSBC originally set up facilitate money gained from selling opium to the Chinese.
 
Last edited:
"101 companies listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) most of them British have mining operations in 37 sub-Saharan African countries. They collectively control over $1 trillion worth of Aftrica's most valuable resources. The UK government has used it's power and influence to ensure that British mining companies have access to Africa's raw materials. This was the case during the colonial period and is stil the case today" Also HSBC, Coutt's banks caught money laundering out of the Off Shore facilities Cayman, Virgin Islands to mention a few run by the Crown amassing huge profit from drug crime! HSBC originally set up facilitate money gained from selling opium to the Chinese.
I have finally cottoned on Mick. You are Mick…..Mick Bond, the brother of James, James Bond. I wondered where you get all this inside information from. How is Miss Moneypenny getting on?
 
I have finally cottoned on Mick. You are Mick…..Mick Bond, the brother of James, James Bond. I wondered where you get all this inside information from. How is Miss Moneypenny getting on?
No Bond like intelligence B just following the lovely married couple Matt Ehret and Cynthia Chung they were students of LaRouche where they learned thier research skills and wow are they blessed with understanding history and like Robert they don't keep it to themselves.
 
King Charles first portrait revealed today. If this doesn't look satanic I don't know what does...however there maybe symbolism to the portrait. Does not Charles look like he is fading from the picture??? MKUltra butterfly?
 

Attachments

  • _133305635_455d3b68-e998-4cf5-9718-93c5e8b093d1.jpg
    _133305635_455d3b68-e998-4cf5-9718-93c5e8b093d1.jpg
    246.7 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
King Charles first portrait revealed today. If this doesn't look satanic I don't know what does...however there maybe something more to the portrait. Does not Charles look like he is fading from the picture??? MKUltra butterfly?
It is a demonic portent of the British Empire, Satan's earthly throne, being consumed in flames

"Your heart became haughty because of your beauty. You corrupted your wisdom because of your own glorious splendor. I will throw you down to the earth. I will make you a spectacle before kings. Because of your great guilt and your dishonest trading, you have profaned your sanctuaries. I will cause a fire to break out in your midst, and it will consume you. I will reduce you to ashes on the earth before all those looking at you. All who knew you among the peoples will stare at you in amazement. Your end will be sudden and terrible, and you will cease to exist for all time.” - Ezekiel 28:17-19

 
It’s certainly the worst royal portrait so far, bar the one Rolf Harris did for the queen. Any old crud passes for “art” these days. This one is so obscure it must be daubed at this way to cover up a great lack of skill. His face seems to have been photoshopped from the various portraits of his mother. If it has any biblical reference I would be surprized, unless incompetence rates as satanic commentary.
 
The British Monarchy invented environmentalism as a vehicle for deindustrialization and depopulation. As the head of the Church of England, the monarchy has used religion as a mechanism to further loot the planet. Turns out the business of getting rid of billions of useless eaters is a good investment. By fusing environmentalism and religion, the British Empire created a new religion, Gaia. Clicking around the web I came across this article: Every Faith Has Been Looted.

Presumably, the Governing Body has learned its lesson from the UN/NGO debacle where the Watchtower Society was listed on the UN's website as an Associate NGO and has not directly signed onto any of the interfaith/environmental investment vehicles that have come into existence under the direction of the World Economic Forum. However, it rouses suspicion since the Watchtower boasts of its cutting edge environmentally friendly construction projects, such as Warwick and the Ramapo. (Here is a Watchtower article. Also, check out the related articles boasting of their environmental awards.)

There is nothing particularly odious about trying to be conscious of the impact on the environment; however, given the Watchtower's involvement with the United Nations, the hedge fund world, and the insidious masonic influence over the organization, which is controlled by the monarchy, there is no doubt in my mind that the Watchtower is in the orbit of the British Empire. Notice this: Monday, April 22nd was Earth Day, and as we might expect, jw.org had a homepage article surreptitiously honoring that day with an article: Who Will Save the Earth?

Of course, JWs would not notice anything out of the way because of the tricky double-speak that the Watchtower has become an expert at. For example, note that a subheading says: Why human effort alone will not save the planet. That little word "alone" says a lot. Why not state unequivocally that human efforts will utterly fail? Their intention is easy to detect once we tune into the Watchtower's serpent-speak. Here is another comment from the article:

By only citing the scriptural reference and not quoting the verse verbatim, the wizards of Warwick take the liberty of interpreting what it says. Jehovah is not going to utterly destroy those destroying the earth, he is merely going to stop them. Christ is not going to smash the nations with an iron rod and leave the carcasses of the dead strewn from one end of the earth to the other; no, he will merely "replace them." But replacing governments is exactly what the globalists under King Charles intends to do. They are even now in the process of replacing national governments and overturning Christian civilization with the intention of establishing a new world order ruled directly by Satan, the Devil.

The clickbait piece links to other articles touting the Watchtower's environmentalism.

So that you know, Earth Day was established in 1970 by the United Nations.

Do you mean that the Watchtower is now playing down exactly what Jehovah and Jesus are going to do?
 
What I find very suspicious(even insidious) is that their articles don't have a date of when it was published, making it more difficult to determine when it has been written. If it said Apr 22, some JWs that are aware might have been able to connect the dots. I would go as far as calling it censorship.

They have to tread a fine line between not offending JW sensibilities and UN's. So the sly wording is a carefully architected compromise.
Yes, I've noticed that lately, really trying hard not to "offend" the world, and even at the expense of hurting Jehovah's sheep as we well know..
 
It’s certainly the worst royal portrait so far, bar the one Rolf Harris did for the queen. Any old crud passes for “art” these days. This one is so obscure it must be daubed at this way to cover up a great lack of skill. His face seems to have been photoshopped from the various portraits of his mother. If it has any biblical reference I would be surprized, unless incompetence rates as satanic commentary.
Na I’m not sure Bro. It’s pretty impressive and original in terms of portrait art in my opinion.
And in terms of prophesy could well be a herald.
Just saying😅
 
Na I’m not sure Bro. It’s pretty impressive and original in terms of portrait art in my opinion.
And in terms of prophesy could well be a herald.
Just saying😅
I shall hastily concede your point Seadog. I have argued what constitutes art before and found it impossible to defeat. Here, for your delectation, is just such an example of some poor art critic trying to sound knowledgeable about one our most famous modern artists who lives up the road from me. Warning: Wear dark glasses!
 
King Charles first portrait revealed today. If this doesn't look satanic I don't know what does...however there maybe symbolism to the portrait. Does not Charles look like he is fading from the picture??? MKUltra butterfly?
If you mirror the image of King Charles portrait notice the figure in the middle Hidden in plain sight
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5275.jpg
    IMG_5275.jpg
    323.4 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_5279.jpg
    IMG_5279.jpg
    263.9 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_5276.jpg
    IMG_5276.jpg
    344.1 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_5278.jpg
    IMG_5278.jpg
    132.8 KB · Views: 15
  • images-3.jpeg
    images-3.jpeg
    3.3 KB · Views: 15
Top