kirmmy
Well-known member
I just read this: https://e-watchman.com/coming-fall-house-god/
Excellent article.
My question is from here:
But if Jehovah is to be “a defense around the inhabitants of Jerusalem,” as the scripture says, how is it that “the city will actually be captured and the houses be pillaged, and the women themselves will be raped. And half of the city must go forth into the exile; but as for the remaining ones of the people, they will not be cut off from the city”? (Zechariah 14:1-2)
RK goes on to explain that:
“The remaining ones of the people” who are not cut off from the city are the remaining ones of the covenant, whose martyrdom during the great tribulation brings about their instantaneous transfer to the New Jerusalem.
The question is simple; Why did Zechariah put the last part of that scripture as a question? Expressed Doubt on the part of the prophet? Mistranslation? Incorrect interpretation of the original Hebrew?
Brother King doesn't mention and obviously believes it is a statement.
Excellent article.
My question is from here:
But if Jehovah is to be “a defense around the inhabitants of Jerusalem,” as the scripture says, how is it that “the city will actually be captured and the houses be pillaged, and the women themselves will be raped. And half of the city must go forth into the exile; but as for the remaining ones of the people, they will not be cut off from the city”? (Zechariah 14:1-2)
RK goes on to explain that:
“The remaining ones of the people” who are not cut off from the city are the remaining ones of the covenant, whose martyrdom during the great tribulation brings about their instantaneous transfer to the New Jerusalem.
The question is simple; Why did Zechariah put the last part of that scripture as a question? Expressed Doubt on the part of the prophet? Mistranslation? Incorrect interpretation of the original Hebrew?
Brother King doesn't mention and obviously believes it is a statement.