All about Covid

Well, at that time no one was really sure what covid was or how deadly or contagious it was, many were getting very sick!
I didn't post the video that this comment was posted under but the video had also discussed the hypocrisy of the GB during covid since THEY remained closed for bethel tours for at least a year and a half later due to their taking "covid precautions" but had no problem having us assemble. Unbelievable!
Actually, by Spring of 2022 (the scenario timeline the OP refers) it was known that for most people covid would be like the flu, the elderly and immune-compromised were at more risk, that the vaccine did NOT stop the spread. It was clearly known that it was very contagious, how it spread, and that the stats of how deadly it was was likely over-stated.
 
Well, at that time no one was really sure what covid was or how deadly or contagious it was, many were getting very sick!
I didn't post the video that this comment was posted under but the video had also discussed the hypocrisy of the GB during covid since THEY remained closed for bethel tours for at least a year and a half later due to their taking "covid precautions" but had no problem having us assemble. Unbelievable!
It was never about health but was always about money and control.
 
Actually, by Spring of 2022 (the scenario timeline the OP refers) it was known that for most people covid would be like the flu, the elderly and immune-compromised were at more risk, that the vaccine did NOT stop the spread. It was clearly known that it was very contagious, how it spread, and that the stats of how deadly it was was likely over-stated.
Many at the hall are elderly and immune compromised so the loving thing to do would have been to hold it on zoom, or at least inform the congregation so they could make their own personal decision whether to attend in person or not.
 
Last edited:
Many at the hall are elderly and immune compromised so the loving thing to do would have been to hold it on zoom, or at least inform the congregation so they could make their own personal decision whether to attend in person or not.
I guess, but my point is that people will be exposed to covid forever. So if someone is immune compromised or elderly, this risk will exist everywhere they go. Sometimes people know they're exposed, sometimes they don't. The elders could be making these calls twice a week forever, if they probably really knew the true exposure rate. There is also the flu, shingles, rsv, - a whole host of ailments that could disproportionately effect elderly ones. Where to draw the line? The meetings should go back to 100% zoom then. Along your line of reasoning though, a local cong near me had an "outbreak" (covid, rsv, flu, not sure it matters?) and canceled meeting and shifted to zoom last week- so there seems to be an internal fracturing of direction, it's discretionary by cong, or the GB has changed their minds once again.
 
@goldie The debate can be easily settled.

What would you do for cold/flu? It's the same. Natural evolution of viruses goes from most deadliest in the beginning, and the immune system learns and reacts. Each successive infection changes the virus, and the reaction of the human immune system slightly. It always evolves into something less deadly. Cold/Flu isn't deadly because otherwise it kills the host and it cannot spread. Viruses can't live outside the host.

Did you know the Black Plague that killed up to half the population of medieval Europe still exists? Did you know the 1918 flu still exists? You don't hear of them even though people still die of it, because it's inconsequential in the big picture.

An average non-Western human body has 3,000 various bacteria on the body. Westerner has 2,000. The point was that Western countries have high cases of autism, allergies, skin conditions, and endless other ailments. They serve a function and purpose.

The elderly do have an immune system, although not as strong. If they did not have an immune system, they'd be at the hospital with everyone handling them with gloves, oxygen masks on, shielded by plastic covers to prevent any infections. Look into people at the latter stages of AIDS. Definition of AIDS is dead immune system. They get sicknesses that doctors haven't heard of, or haven't heard of for 300 years. Most people fight it off.

In Japan after the massive earthquake followed by a Tsunami, compromised the nuclear reactors in Fukishima. They had to go and deal with the meltdown, but they could not. They sent in robots specially shielded against radiation(2 years work) but once it got close enough it would fail. Thus some went in personally. Older Japanese people said the younger people are our future so we should go to save the future of the nation. It speaks to the bravery of the people. The problem locking down entire societies mostly consisting of people who can fight off infections is precisely that.
 
They are doing everything possible to prevent anyone getting to the heart of the matter. All the while, the matter is certainty getting to the heart.
💉
💔


 
Not at all...what I wrote above is like saying, "I thought I was wrong once, but then I realized I was wrong." In other words, What I was wrong about was thinking I was wrong.
Well, I ain't always right, but I've never been wrong
Seldom turns out the way it does in a song
Once in a while, you get shown the light
In the strangest of places if you look at it right

(Credit for the above lyrics do not go to me)
 
Not sure if this has been mentioned on the forum. I believe the law comes into effect in May.


French “Democracy” Establishes Medical Tyranny

Paul Craig Roberts

Professor Michel Chossudovsky, director of Global Research, has examined the new French law that defines dissent from official medical narratives as a “sectarian aberration” and criminalizes dissent from medical narratives, such as “the mRNA vaccine is safe and effective.”

The law also creates a new crime called “provocation to abstention from medical care.” A French citizen is guilty of a crime if the person refuses a vaccine or medical treatment handed down by authorities. Had the law been in place during the mass vaccination campaign with the deadly mRNA “vaccine,” all who refused would have received three years imprisonment and paid a 45,000 euro fine. This ensures that next time everyone will receive the “vaccine,” because if you refuse you will be imprisoned and the prison rules will require you to be “vaccinated.”

The new law also protects the pharmaceutical corporations from any accountability for the deaths and health damage their lies caused by criminalizing French citizens–including doctors and medical scientists–who speak against the Covid-19 “vaccines.” This demonstrates the power of Big Pharma over democracy, which with this death blow given to free speech and medical fact no longer exists in France.
 
Top