AUSTRALIA CONDEMNS SELF-SUFFICIENCY. BASES FOR THE FUTURE 666?

P

Paul resiliente

Guest
In Australia, a law is promoted to prohibit the planting and harvesting of food at home for self-sufficiency. They could fine you financially and even forcefully enter your property by way of search and seizure. They begin to generate the ideal conditions for most of the masses to fall into the future 666 mark "To buy and sell" which could mean in most cases having food for day to day. I have the image of someone enclosing the chickens with a wide fabric on their sides and closing it slowly and silently, some of us will try to jump and find a shortcut to avoid said diabolical mark. This news is directly related to an objective of the UN 2030 agenda of "Sustainable Cities" (or intelligent), the future urban prisons of the internet. Jehovah give us wisdom to avoid what is coming, for a reason Revelation mentions that the 7-headed beast receives "Authority over every tribe, people, language and nation", without a doubt that technology will allow it to fulfill this prophecy of total control during "A hour" symbolic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BagdadBill

Well-known member
I saw that in Twitter or Youtube but it is getting pushback about what it really is. Can you shed any light on it? Maybe a bill number or maybe a report to go by? Not that we haven't been expecting something like it, but they are throwing so much disinformation out there in hopes that we will jump on it. Then they come by and disprove it and then we lose some of the minds that might have woken up.
 
P

Paul resiliente

Guest
Lo vi en Twitter o Youtube, pero está recibiendo críticas sobre lo que realmente es. ¿Puedes arrojar algo de luz al respecto? ¿Tal vez un número de factura o tal vez un informe para seguir? No es que no hayamos estado esperando algo así, pero están lanzando tanta desinformación con la esperanza de que nos aprovechemos de ella. Luego vienen y lo desaprueban y luego perdemos algunas de las mentes que podrían haber despertado.
As announced by various sources, in the last few hours the Australian Prime Minister, Dan Andrews, approved a law that prohibits the population from growing their own food.

As they stated, the project is within the framework of the 2022 Agriculture Bill and has passed its second reading in Parliament. In line with the aforementioned, the main objective is to preserve biosecurity.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO): "Biosafety is a strategic and integrated approach to analyze and manage relevant risks to human, animal and plant life and health and the associated risks to the environment. It is based on recognition of critical linkages between sectors and the potential for threats to move within and between sectors with system-wide consequences."

NEW ORDINANCE WOULD PUT A BRAKE ON FOOD PRODUCTION

If the legislation passes, authorities would be in a position to expand the powers of law enforcement, search property and people without a warrant, and increase fines from $1,800 to $10,000 for providing false information.

You may also be interested in: Historical record in deforestation: the Brazilian Amazon lost more than 1,000 square kilometers of trees in April

That said, they stated that authorized officials will no longer need the owner's consent to remove samples, livestock and documents. In this way they will not be required to present an official identification and they have been notified that severe penalties will be applied for obstructing access to their lands.

FOR A FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SOVEREIGNTY!

Estamos en tiempos donde la producción de alimentos está sujeta al agronegocio, por lo que factores como la concentración de tierras, el desmonte, los monocultivos, las semillas transgénicas y el uso masivo de agroquímicos provocan daños irreparables.

¡Es imperativo señalar que este modelo va en contra de la ecología, el medio ambiente y las comunidades en general!

La soberanía alimentaria requiere una intervención activa del Estado, materializada en políticas públicas en las que prevalezcan modos de producción sostenibles.

Finalmente, esta nueva ordenanza pretende prohibir el cultivo de alimentos por parte de los pequeños productores y en esta línea creemos que existe precisamente una paradoja que deja en claro cómo los intereses corporativos prevalecen sobre las cuestiones ambientales y la vida de todas las especies.
 

4JahandChrist

Well-known member
As announced by various sources, in the last few hours the Australian Prime Minister, Dan Andrews, approved a law that prohibits the population from growing their own food.

As they stated, the project is within the framework of the 2022 Agriculture Bill and has passed its second reading in Parliament. In line with the aforementioned, the main objective is to preserve biosecurity.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO): "Biosafety is a strategic and integrated approach to analyze and manage relevant risks to human, animal and plant life and health and the associated risks to the environment. It is based on recognition of critical linkages between sectors and the potential for threats to move within and between sectors with system-wide consequences."

NEW ORDINANCE WOULD PUT A BRAKE ON FOOD PRODUCTION

If the legislation passes, authorities would be in a position to expand the powers of law enforcement, search property and people without a warrant, and increase fines from $1,800 to $10,000 for providing false information.

You may also be interested in: Historical record in deforestation: the Brazilian Amazon lost more than 1,000 square kilometers of trees in April

That said, they stated that authorized officials will no longer need the owner's consent to remove samples, livestock and documents. In this way they will not be required to present an official identification and they have been notified that severe penalties will be applied for obstructing access to their lands.

FOR A FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SOVEREIGNTY!

Estamos en tiempos donde la producción de alimentos está sujeta al agronegocio, por lo que factores como la concentración de tierras, el desmonte, los monocultivos, las semillas transgénicas y el uso masivo de agroquímicos provocan daños irreparables.

¡Es imperativo señalar que este modelo va en contra de la ecología, el medio ambiente y las comunidades en general!

La soberanía alimentaria requiere una intervención activa del Estado, materializada en políticas públicas en las que prevalezcan modos de producción sostenibles.

Finalmente, esta nueva ordenanza pretende prohibir el cultivo de alimentos por parte de los pequeños productores y en esta línea creemos que existe precisamente una paradoja que deja en claro cómo los intereses corporativos prevalecen sobre las cuestiones ambientales y la vida de todas las especies.
That's interesting. Dan Andrews is the Premier of Victoria and is a snide little Jock. I hadn't heard of the Food legislation but it doesn't surprise me one bit as the Vic Gov are nothing but a bunch of Commie Cowboys.

Surprisingly he is quite popular. 95% of Victorians are jabbed and think that Dan Andrews has saved them.


Victorians like most Australians are quite ignorant of Agenda 21 and 2030. My local regional Vic Council is a signatory to Agenda 2030 but 99% of the population are completely unaware of it's existence. Even when I've brought it up in conversation they aren't even remotely interested in it.
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
One of the comments I read about this was saying that all of this was to protect farmers. I read through quite a bit of it. The important parts that I could find. I would liken this to the National Electrical Code (NEC) in the USA. NEC is written by lawyers on behalf of fire fighters for the safety of commercial electrical work. Much of what you read in it sounds very general. I used to wire homes and the NEC applies to homes as well but reading it and applying it isn't always clear and straighforward.
The bill in Australia reads like they are trying to control the spread of weeds against bad people who are intentionally spreading "noxious weeds". Common sense kicks in here and I am wondering who drives around to farms to sow noxious weeds, for any reason. The answer is they don't but I'm sure there is something to idea the present but they muddy the water with vague language.

"The Bill provides for graduated penalties for offences relating to the spreading of noxious weeds without a permit and improve consistency of penalties to similar offences relating to pest animals."

The powers granted by this bill, allow basically any official to trespass on your land, take photos, samples, or uproot your garden if it is deemed to be a noxious weed. Wonder what they think about Asparagus? Food biosecurity is clearly one of the methods they will use to control food.
I believe you are correct but there won't be any stopping it if the people won't fight.
 

SusanB

Well-known member
That's interesting. Dan Andrews is the Premier of Victoria and is a snide little Jock. I hadn't heard of the Food legislation but it doesn't surprise me one bit as the Vic Gov are nothing but a bunch of Commie Cowboys.

Surprisingly he is quite popular. 95% of Victorians are jabbed and think that Dan Andrews has saved them.


Victorians like most Australians are quite ignorant of Agenda 21 and 2030. My local regional Vic Council is a signatory to Agenda 2030 but 99% of the population are completely unaware of it's existence. Even when I've brought it up in conversation they aren't even remotely interested in it.
Before COVID but after Trump became President I had an Australian couple in my Uber car and they were sooo weirded out that the US elected Donald Trump and they asked what in the world the Americans were thinking. Then along comes COVID and the Australian politicos make quite a name for themselves too. Like Gladys whatshername?
 

4JahandChrist

Well-known member
Before COVID but after Trump became President I had an Australian couple in my Uber car and they were sooo weirded out that the US elected Donald Trump and they asked what in the world the Americans were thinking. Then along comes COVID and the Australian politicos make quite a name for themselves too. Like Gladys whatshername?
The Australian Media with the exception of Sky News is extremely Left Leaning so Trump was torn to pieces here.....massive derangement syndrome.

Gladys resigned shortly after Billionaire Clive Palmer called her out for being bribed by Astrazeneca and Pfizer to push Vaccination. Go to the 9 minute mark of this interview and you'll see Mr Palmer drop one of the biggest truth bombs in the Covid 19 debacle and yet it was completely hushed by MSM. (This also fits in quite well with the OP's post about Dan Andrews.....if Gladys is being bought by Lobyists then so would Dannny Boy)

 

SusanB

Well-known member
The Australian Media with the exception of Sky News is extremely Left Leaning so Trump was torn to pieces here.....massive derangement syndrome.

Gladys resigned shortly after Billionaire Clive Palmer called her out for being bribed by Astrazeneca and Pfizer to push Vaccination. Go to the 9 minute mark of this interview and you'll see Mr Palmer drop one of the biggest truth bombs in the Covid 19 debacle and yet it was completely hushed by MSM. (This also fits in quite well with the OP's post about Dan Andrews.....if Gladys is being bought by Lobyists then so would Dannny Boy)

Interesting.
 

kirmmy

Well-known member
As announced by various sources, in the last few hours the Australian Prime Minister, Dan Andrews, approved a law that prohibits the population from growing their own food.

As they stated, the project is within the framework of the 2022 Agriculture Bill and has passed its second reading in Parliament. In line with the aforementioned, the main objective is to preserve biosecurity.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO): "Biosafety is a strategic and integrated approach to analyze and manage relevant risks to human, animal and plant life and health and the associated risks to the environment. It is based on recognition of critical linkages between sectors and the potential for threats to move within and between sectors with system-wide consequences."

NEW ORDINANCE WOULD PUT A BRAKE ON FOOD PRODUCTION

If the legislation passes, authorities would be in a position to expand the powers of law enforcement, search property and people without a warrant, and increase fines from $1,800 to $10,000 for providing false information.

You may also be interested in: Historical record in deforestation: the Brazilian Amazon lost more than 1,000 square kilometers of trees in April

That said, they stated that authorized officials will no longer need the owner's consent to remove samples, livestock and documents. In this way they will not be required to present an official identification and they have been notified that severe penalties will be applied for obstructing access to their lands.

FOR A FAIR AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SOVEREIGNTY!

Estamos en tiempos donde la producción de alimentos está sujeta al agronegocio, por lo que factores como la concentración de tierras, el desmonte, los monocultivos, las semillas transgénicas y el uso masivo de agroquímicos provocan daños irreparables.

¡Es imperativo señalar que este modelo va en contra de la ecología, el medio ambiente y las comunidades en general!

La soberanía alimentaria requiere una intervención activa del Estado, materializada en políticas públicas en las que prevalezcan modos de producción sostenibles.

Finalmente, esta nueva ordenanza pretende prohibir el cultivo de alimentos por parte de los pequeños productores y en esta línea creemos que existe precisamente una paradoja que deja en claro cómo los intereses corporativos prevalecen sobre las cuestiones ambientales y la vida de todas las especies.
That is amazing! What fascists. "search property and people without a warrant" and "they will not be required to present an official identification". So anyone can come onto your property and do pretty much anything without showing any ID. Who's bright idea was this!?
95% of Victorians are jabbed and think that Dan Andrews has saved them
They are like the French and will re-elect that sociopath. "Govern me harder daddy!"
 

kirmmy

Well-known member
The Australian Media with the exception of Sky News is extremely Left Leaning so Trump was torn to pieces here.....massive derangement syndrome.

Gladys resigned shortly after Billionaire Clive Palmer called her out for being bribed by Astrazeneca and Pfizer to push Vaccination. Go to the 9 minute mark of this interview and you'll see Mr Palmer drop one of the biggest truth bombs in the Covid 19 debacle and yet it was completely hushed by MSM. (This also fits in quite well with the OP's post about Dan Andrews.....if Gladys is being bought by Lobyists then so would Dannny Boy)

I saw that and was waiting and HOPING that the weight was going to drop on hunchback Danny too, but it never happened. He did get called out on some impropriety as I remember but it didn't stick. As you said in another comment, he has an extremely punchable face.
 
Top