Dear Brothers,
Thank you so much for your letter dated July 12, 2021, in reply to my earlier correspondence. I am grateful for the time that you took to write to me and to answer specifically and thoroughly one of my questions. I want to respond to your comments and to share information which has come to light since I wrote my last letter. Thank you so much in advance for the time you take to read this letter.
I would particularly like to respond to this portion of your letter:
“When considering the use of cells harvested from an aborted fetus, the following two questions would need to be considered. First, is the abortion arranged with the express purpose of harvesting such cells? If so, then using those cells would make one directly complicit in the willful taking of a human life. Second, does the act of taking the desired cells from the fetus actually kill it? If so, that too would make the one using those cells complicit in the willful taking of human life.”
I have uncovered information which strongly suggests that the fetal cell lines which were used to manufacture and test vaccines may indeed have been taken from live fetuses, which process would have killed them. Furthermore, since the polio and rubella vaccines were developed before abortion was legalized and at a time when abortions were being performed for eugenical reasons on unwilling mothers, it seems reasonable to surmise that at least some of the many abortions which eventually produced the cell lines for those vaccines may have been performed against the will of the mothers, and possibly with the intention of acquiring fetal cells for research.
I have also discovered evidence that humanized mice were used in the development of the COVID-19 vaccines. There are several ways to humanize mice. The conventional way of humanizing mice is to engraft elements of a human immune system by using the thymus and livers of aborted babies. David Daleiden of Center for Medical Progress has discovered a document from the University of Pennsylvania that makes it clear that scientists are dissecting babies who are still alive in order to obtain their organs. Were the babies whose murdered bodies were used to provide “tissue” to humanize some of the mice for COVID-19 experimentation alive when they had their organs removed? I don’t know if there is any way to know for sure. But from what I have been able to discover, it is a definite possibility. This is information that, understandably, is not widely publicized and is in some cases openly denied.
Please see the enclosed documents and judge for yourselves whether this evidence is compelling enough to call into question what we have been told about aborted fetal cell research and about the particular cell lines that were used to manufacture and test the COVID-19 vaccines.
Because the evidence supporting these ideas seems to be to be reasonably strong, and because the implications are so horrifying, I believe that the mere chance they could be true is reason enough to shun any medical product that has been manufactured or tested using aborted fetal cell lines or other types of aborted fetal tissue. And I believe that all true Christians have a right to have access to this information so they can make a truly informed decision, just as we have been able to do in the case of blood fractions.
As far as the actual safety of vaccines, I understand that, as you stated, you feel that the “preponderance of established medical evidence” supports the conclusion that vaccines are safe and effective. As I expressed in my last letter, my contention has long been that the medical evidence we have that seems to support the idea that vaccines are safe and effective is highly flawed, much of it tainted by industry bias. There has never in the history of vaccination been a study done to compare the long-term health of the vaccinated vs. the completely unvaccinated. And most vaccine safety studies are performed without a true placebo (a completely inert substance), meaning that another vaccine or other type injection containing aluminum is used as a “placebo”. It is undeniable that some vaccines do provide some, often imperfect, disease immunity for varying periods of time (sometimes no longer than a few months or years). But at what cost? For some people, the cost is their long-term health or even their very lives. In my last letter, I cited a few of the many vaccine-critical studies published in respected medical journals. I realize that these studies are in the minority, but I do not feel that their authors had a non-medical agenda.
It seems perfectly reasonable to take certain medical risks to save a life. For example, my husband was dying of heart disease, so we felt that the considerable risk of open-heart surgery was worth it for him. But it is another matter entirely when considering vaccination. We vaccinate perfectly healthy people in hopes of protecting them from some hypothetical future threat, so the expectation has to be very high that these vaccines will not harm. Unfortunately, scientific evidence, some of which I presented in my last letter, suggests that claims that vaccines are safe and effective have been highly exaggerated. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccines, safety data is sorely lacking, and the signals which now show that these vaccines may be dangerous are being ignored by the medical establishment.
I do hope that, if you have not seen it before, you find this data to be compelling enough that you acknowledge that those of us who have chosen not to be vaccinated have some valid spiritual and personal reasons for this and that no one should try to coerce us to change our minds or make us feel that we are committing a wrong by not being vaccinated, as has happened to me and to others.
I again want to thank you brothers for all you do in an effort to “feed the little sheep.” I want to state again, as well, that I do understand the enormous pressure you must be under because of the current political situation. I will continue to pray that Jehovah blesses you with his holy spirit in all your endeavors, and that he strengthens and guides you.