Biden Handing over Sovereignty to W.H.O

kirmmy

Well-known member
I’m going to push back a little bit on this Bill.

To a man, everyone I’ve talked with (family members, business colleagues, and clients) who served in either Afghanistan or Iraq said that the ROE (rules of engagement) were so onerous, that a military victory could never be won, and that they we’re fighting with two hands tied behind their back.

They also said, that had the politicians taken the gloves off, that both wars could have been been over in less than two years. I’m happy to share their stories with you privately. But boiling it down, I’ll quote one soldier who said “the flaming hoops they had to jump through to kill the enemy were insane. As were the penalties if you didn’t obey the insane rules or messed up by causing human collateral damage, property damage, or shot someone who was unarmed. He said they’d watch the enemy installing IED’s - but couldn’t shoot them unless they were armed. So the enemy knew that, and had free reign to plant them. They’d have to call in the location and hope the ordinance disposal guys got there before an American or Civilian activated the device. If you did shoot the IED installers, you’d be brought up on charges. I probably have at least 25-30 more stories just like these.
It was like Nam, Sparky, they wouldn't let us win. :)
 

Jah-son

Well-known member
Something else to consider. The clown who rules to the north is a fanboy of China and their "basic dictatorship". He has allowed Chinese troops to come over and train on Canadian soil. Likely that a bunch of them could come from the north.
They had best avoid states like Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Western Colorado, The Dakotas, etc. My family alone are all well armed and will defend the homeland to the death from any foreign invasion. And if they even make it to the deep south it will not end well.
 

SusanB

Well-known member

A.M.S.

Well-known member

 
Last edited:

SusanB

Well-known member
Viva and Barnes discuss the WHO treaty in the first half of the segment. Basically the treat would be illegal in the US if isn't passed through congress. And most treaties end up being ignored anyway as we all know.
https://rumble.com/v14uesv-ep.-113-...-dominion-mules-and-more-viva-and-barnes.html
Jah-son, I heard that pod cast too and it sounded logical. But then I began to remember how many things the current world leaders have done that are not legal and yet they do them and they have the police or soldiers to back it up. It’s like a bully punching you in the nose and then looking at you like “What are you going to do about it?”. You probably can’t do a darn thing about it. You could file a lawsuit if you have the resources and time, but they could also tie you up in court for a ridiculous amount of time, which is all they need to finish it. Look at the Durham investigation. No, I believe this threat of giving sovereignty to the WHO is a real threat.
 

LifeLearning

Well-known member
I believe this threat of giving sovereignty to the WHO is a real threat
I agree Driven, they are doing this for a purpose.

The ruling elite have shown us in the last few years how they are playing it.

Would you have believed three years ago that American citizens would be ushered into the capital building like a baseball stadium, then hunted down, arrested and held without trial for years in horrid conditions... not just for misdemeanor crimes... no, for entrapment by the same government agencies that are charged with justice and security?

I will go where-ever our God sends me. For now I have my sword, and my complete suit of armor (literally) as I await the coming destruction. The idea that we are in a spiritual paradise along with the NWO, UN/WHO, GB... it's clear that 99% of the friends are clueless. I am sick considering their lack of understanding.
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
I agree Driven, they are doing this for a purpose.

The ruling elite have shown us in the last few years how they are playing it.

If they tried to hand over power directly to the UN it wouldn't fly. If they do it through the WHO, which is still UN, I doubt that enough people would balk against it. A lot of people don't really understand about these agencies and who they are. Think of it like a backdoor. At least half of America would be for this because they're brainwashed about the covid scam. That includes Jehovah's Witnesses as a whole, as long as the GB stands behind it.
 

SusanB

Well-known member
Good point
If they tried to hand over power directly to the UN it wouldn't fly. If they do it through the WHO, which is still UN, I doubt that enough people would balk against it. A lot of people don't really understand about these agencies and who they are. Think of it like a backdoor. At least half of America would be for this because they're brainwashed about the covid scam. That includes Jehovah's Witnesses as a whole, as long as the GB stands behind it.
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
Good point
A few people have pointed out to me that somewhere around 2005 the US had already signed some sort of treaty with the WHO that got this started, and they are saying that this is refining of what was already agreed. Sort of a tightening of their grip. I would try to dig that up but it's pretty obvious that this is where they're headed. The patriots might not want it but not all of them understand what it means.
The military that the UN has is not huge. That said, we can't exactly look to the governments, military and police to intercede and uphold constitutional law. The military has already been purged to weed out those who might question orders. The police will be in the situation of trying to quell riots soon enough I think. Kings and their military commanders is what Revelation says. That would of course include the police.
Don't expect the UN military force to come knocking. It will be the locals mostly and there will be a plan.
 

LifeLearning

Well-known member
A few people have pointed out to me that somewhere around 2005 the US had already signed some sort of treaty with the WHO that got this started, and they are saying that this is refining of what was already agreed.
The original treaty was edited and submitted as revisions. See the second link at this thread, it's a PDF of the treaty with revised markup so you can see exactly how it was changed. https://e-jehovahs-witnesses.com/in...-amended-regulations-unilateral-control.1015/
 

Carl

Well-known member
A few people have pointed out to me that somewhere around 2005 the US had already signed some sort of treaty with the WHO that got this started, and they are saying that this is refining of what was already agreed. Sort of a tightening of their grip. I would try to dig that up but it's pretty obvious that this is where they're headed. The patriots might not want it but not all of them understand what it means.
The military that the UN has is not huge. That said, we can't exactly look to the governments, military and police to intercede and uphold constitutional law. The military has already been purged to weed out those who might question orders. The police will be in the situation of trying to quell riots soon enough I think. Kings and their military commanders is what Revelation says. That would of course include the police.
Don't expect the UN military force to come knocking. It will be the locals mostly and there will be a plan.
Maybe the globalists in the US figure they can legally sign treaties with the WHO without the required 2/3s Senate confirmation, by reasoning they're not making an alliance with a foreign nation? The love to do workarounds... for example, the US government uses corporations to disseminate their propaganda and control speech... why not use foreign corporations like the WHO to do the same?

The US Constitution is dead, the Supreme Court only pays lip service to it in order to preserve their power as one of the so called 3 branches of government. Set aside the fact we know almost all politicians and judges are controlled by someone, they have to at least pretend to be following the law of the land, otherwise the sheep would wake up before they had been safely corralled into the culling and slave pens. When the restraint is lifted, look out, because our military will not bat an eye at discarding the Constitution. I believe this day is coming soon.
 

SusanB

Well-known member
Maybe the globalists in the US figure they can legally sign treaties with the WHO without the required 2/3s Senate confirmation, by reasoning they're not making an alliance with a foreign nation? The love to do workarounds... for example, the US government uses corporations to disseminate their propaganda and control speech... why not use foreign corporations like the WHO to do the same?

The US Constitution is dead, the Supreme Court only pays lip service to it in order to preserve their power as one of the so called 3 branches of government. Set aside the fact we know almost all politicians and judges are controlled by someone, they have to at least pretend to be following the law of the land, otherwise the sheep would wake up before they had been safely corralled into the culling and slave pens. When the restraint is lifted, look out, because our military will not bat an eye at discarding the Constitution. I believe this day is coming soon.
I just read an article on this very thing as per Brother King’s post above. Biden already (and quietly) signed an agreement with WHO but they renamed it so that it is not called a treaty. But I can’t recall what they called it. These people are crafty and they use statecraft to achieve their corrupt goals.
 
Last edited:
Top