I saw the interview with Rogan and Malone. Whilst I agree that there was some really good stuff on there , some things about Malone make me feel he could possibly be "controlled opposition" . That doesn't mean he's not a valid resource for with controlled opposition the goal is to speak 90% truth with a 10% twist. So in other words I listen with a cautionary view.
With Controlled Disinformation Agents they tend to use a bit of double speak...in other words whilst ostensibly they speak against Covid and the Vaccines they slip in the occasional phrase that would suggest the opposite.
With Robert Malone he...
1. Claims to have contracted the Virus almost immediately at the start of the Pandemic. (So immediately validates the Official MSM danger of the disease)
2. Not only does he claim to have contracted Covid he goes on to say that he had "Long Covid". (So this suggests to the Rogan listeners that not only is Covid a real and dangerous Virus ..it can also make you very sick for a long time.This ironically can push people toward the Vax.)
3. Despite recovering from Long Covid he goes on to still take the Vaccines. Why? If he was as intelligent as he makes out to be why would he get jabbed if he had developed robust natural immunity? ( By doing this Malone suggests to the Rogan listeners that Vaccination is mostly harmful for those that have had Covid...not for those that hav'nt)
4. He is quite open about having many contacts in the CIA. Immediate red flags there.
5. He mostly concentrates on the danger of the Vaccinations to Children. He doesn't rule out that the Vaccines can be taken by Adults, especially those who are more senior. (This can make him seem quite anti Covid Vaccines when in effect he has still left the door open for Adults.)
6. His body language. I know that's not entirely reliable but he often looks like he is trying to stay very scripted. Something about his demeanour does not suggest Candor to me.
Remember, the key is that Controlled Opposition appears to be on side with the "truth" but slips through facts that support the Agenda at the same time. That's what makes me feel this guy needs to be treated with caution.
Btw....can I state again, I enjoyed the interview. I actually downloaded it to hard drive. I just have my "gut feeling" suggesting that something seems a little bit off.
Thank you so much for bringing up this topic! I’ve wrestled back and forth with myself over this subject. It’s nice to get someone else’s take or perspective on it. Quite frankly, I feel strongly that so many in the “Covid” arena are “controlled opposition”. I feel that the ones who are responsible for this whole plandemic know exactly what they’re doing and what obstacles they’re up against. They’ve run enough “scenarios” after all! They know that for many people, if an authority figure or scientist says something, they will just submit to it because they feel that the authorities know better than they do and have their best interests at heart. They also know that there are plenty of people who will not just take their word for it and will do their own research. The former set of people will be satisfied with just a few grains of truth amidst emotion swaying rhetoric. I Imagine it’s akin to a full time job to sway the latter. Like you mentioned, with the thinking crowd, they have to bait them with a high percentage of truth. At the same time, you’ll notice that the “controlled opposition” are usually under the banner of conspiracy theorists and alternative media. That way, the “90% truth” can easily be passed off as what only the “conspiracy nuts“ would believe. Thus the virtue signallers won’t go near it.
So I’m in agreement with what you’re saying and I‘d love more of your (and others’, if they’re willing) thoughts on the matter. I’ve discussed this with my husband and I’ve said that even genuine people can’t know everything that’s going on and the ones that do know exactly what’s going on aren’t telling. So we’re all left in this limbo, knowing with our “spidey senses” that something’s very wrong and just trying to piece together the facts that we can glean. All this in a sea of mis- and dis-information that is purposely flooded onto all media channels. I try to restrict the flow to those that I think do give a high proportion of truth but like you, I’m very wary of their agendas. It’s hard to fully trust anybody’s motives, really. I search for unvarnished truth but it all seems to have some “dirt” on it. So yeah, I’ve got my own coping mechanisms, if you wanna call them that, but I’m always open and willing to learn from others. So feel free to give me more of your thoughts. I think this is a very important conversation to have.
So with the understanding that I don’t put full trust in what anybody in the media says, I do feel that the ones that spout the least drama and stick with the most facts are the most worth listening to. They are also the ones that can possibly break the spell that seems to be cast over even people I know that I usually respect their thinking ability. My Dad is one. He is very intelligent and I just can’t understand why he doesn’t see through what’s going on. I never would’ve guessed that he’d fall hook, line and sinker for it all. I’ve just chalked it up to pure fear. I think that’s why the “powers that be” have chosen a novel “virus” to kick this all off. Microbes are a danger that we can’t ”see” therefore they are very scary. For at least a century we’ve been told to trust “the experts” to help us fend them off. So people will fall back readily on that behavior if they think the lives of themselves and their loved ones are in extreme danger. It’s brilliant!
But I digress.
Getting back to Dr. Malone… I‘ve looked into personalities and their behaviors …it’s a bit of a passion of mine lol. I do find that the behaviors that Dr. Malone exhibits are consistent with what I would expect for what I believe is his personality. My Dad is actually the same personality, so I do have intimate experience with such behaviors. They will be very careful about what they say especially when it will be scrutinized and it’s important to them that they stick to the “facts”. It’s not that they don’t have their own opinions but will reveal those primarily where they won’t be judged adversely for them. I’m sure we can agree that Dr. Malone is on a platform where many will be passing judgement, even possible legal action on what he says …hence perhaps what you perceive as being ”scripted”. I didn’t get that feel but that doesn’t mean I’m right, either.
Some of the points you brought out above didn’t concern me excessively. He did state his case as to why he chose to take the vaccines. Those are reasons that many have also chosen to take them. He also admitted that he suffered adverse effects from them, even listing the specific effects. I would think that if he had known what the vaccines were capable of, he would’ve held off. He also didn’t seem keen on taking any more shots than the initial two. Also to be considered is that telling other people what choices they should make for themselves is dangerous ground to tread. Whereas, children don’t get to make their own informed choices generally. Therefore, many people have been very concerned about this vaccine push on children. Don‘t get me wrong, though, I’m not trying to make a complete defence for him. I wonder many times if there’s actually anybody that is completely 100% genuine. Even the ones that i think may be, we have to remember that they speak from their own bias and perception. Every human does it. Someone may genuinely believe that what they are speaking is truth and still be in error. We, here, know that quite well from being associated with JW’s.
But thank you again for bringing this up! It’s something that I do think a lot about. And like I said, I’d love to hear more of what other people have to say about this subject!
Thank you so much for all your help, I owe you!!
