Watchtower Whoring for WHO

Watchman

Moderator
Staff member
On Monday, which happened to be the UN's Earth Day, jw.org published an article watering down what the Bible says on the topic.
Today, Wednesday, April 24th, jw dot org is re-running an article originally published in the AWAKE! in 2015 entitled: What You Should Know About Malaria

Okay, so what?--you say. Well, tomorrow, the 25th, just so happens to be WHO's World Malaria Day.

Shouldn't be too much longer before the disgusting thing comes into full view

wt-whoring4-who.jpg

who.jpg
 
Last edited:
Today, Wednesday, April 24th, jw dot org is re-running an article originally published in the AWAKE! in 2015 entitled: What You Should Know About Malaria
Predictable....Not a word about Ivermectin in the above article.

Yet this is what they said in 1995.
*** g95 10/8 p. 26 River Blindness—Conquering a Terrible Scourge ***
Then, beginning in 1987, another weapon was developed in the fight against river blindness. This time, instead of attacking the blackfly, the target was the parasites inside the human body. The weapon was a safe and effective drug named Mectizan (ivermectin), developed in the laboratories of an American pharmaceutical company.
 
Since the AWAKE mag no longer has the Watching the World feature, which used to be peppered with references to the UN and all the plethora of departments with it, now they use jw.org to tout the UN.
 
On Monday, which happened to be the UN's Earth Day, jw.org published an article watering down what the Bible says on the topic.
Today, Wednesday, April 24th, jw dot org is re-running an article originally published in the AWAKE! in 2015 entitled: What You Should Know About Malaria

Okay, so what?--you say. Well, tomorrow, the 25th, just so happens to be WHO's World Malaria Day.

Shouldn't be too much longer before the disgusting thing comes into full view

View attachment 6264

View attachment 6265
Jw.org is essentially a UN website. They should just link the two and call it good.

Oh yeah, I forgot. The globalists like to use front organizations that seem innocent to fool people. Got it. Carry on.
 
Last edited:
[12-15-12 WT - 14 In a selfish and nationalistic world, it is refreshing to find individuals who can and do look beyond national borders. Granted, overcoming prejudices can be difficult. The founder of the television network CNN, Ted Turner, comments about his work with a number of talented individuals from various nations: “Meeting with these people was an incredible experience. I came to see those from other countries not as ‘foreigners,’ but as fellow citizens of the planet. I began to view the word ‘foreign’ as pejorative and created a rule within CNN that the word could not be used either on air or in conversation around the office. Instead, the word ‘international’ was to be used.”]

Ted Turner - As a philanthropist, he gave $1 billion to create the United Nations Foundation, a public charity to broaden U.S. support for the UN.


 
Last edited:
What jw.org does promoting the UN is minuscule compared to all that it publishes. However, the fact that they still devote even a small portion of their space to tout the UN is significant. It shows that the WT is still working to meet the criteria of partnership even though it is no longer officially an approved NGO.
That's how front groups work. Gary Breaux described it perfectly in his talk on misinformation:

Do most of your content on good, honest, wholesome material to draw people in and gain trust, then "insert a zero" here and there like a UN-promoting article, and Presto! You can fool people into believing that you are not affiliated with the UN while promoting its agendas. It's a perfect way of misleading people.
 
That's how front groups work. Gary Breaux described it perfectly in his talk on misinformation:

Do most of your content on good, honest, wholesome material to draw people in and gain trust, then "insert a zero" here and there like a UN-promoting article, and Presto! You can fool people into believing that you are not affiliated with the UN while promoting its agendas. It's a perfect way of misleading people.
Yes, but the UN cannot become apostate. There is no "front group". The leaders of the Watchtower have been led into apostasy by a man of lawlessness who corresponds to Judas. Judas was an authentic apostle chosen by Christ. He wasn't a frontman for the Romans. He conspired with them.
 
Yes, but the UN cannot become apostate. There is no "front group". The leaders of the Watchtower have been led into apostasy by a man of lawlessness who corresponds to Judas. Judas was an authentic apostle chosen by Christ. He wasn't a frontman for the Romans. He conspired with them.
I had to re-read this 4 times, slowly-but I think I’m starting to understand now.
Forgive me for asking, but around what year was it that the man of lawlessness came on the scene? I can’t help but kick myself for not seeing any of this before Covid. From the time of Jesus’ choosing of his 12 apostles before Judas turned apostate was less than 3.5 years! That is scary! Is there a definite “dip the bread in the bowl” time in our current timeline that we can point to? (John 13:26)
 
I had to re-read this 4 times, slowly-but I think I’m starting to understand now.
Forgive me for asking, but around what year was it that the man of lawlessness came on the scene? I can’t help but kick myself for not seeing any of this before Covid. From the time of Jesus’ choosing of his 12 apostles before Judas turned apostate was less than 3.5 years! That is scary! Is there a definite “dip the bread in the bowl” time in our current timeline that we can point to? (John 13:26)
That would be hard to pinpoint. Considering the secretive nature of it all, one can only guess.
 
I had to re-read this 4 times, slowly-but I think I’m starting to understand now.
Forgive me for asking, but around what year was it that the man of lawlessness came on the scene? I can’t help but kick myself for not seeing any of this before Covid. From the time of Jesus’ choosing of his 12 apostles before Judas turned apostate was less than 3.5 years! That is scary! Is there a definite “dip the bread in the bowl” time in our current timeline that we can point to? (John 13:26)
The dip-in-the-bowl moment for me was in 2001 when the facts came to light regarding the WT's secret partnership with the UN. Remember, the 11 other apostles had no idea Judas was stealing from them and were still oblivious even when Christ handed Judas the morsel. So, it is not surprising that innocent, meek Christians were/are unaware of these evil doings. The fact that the coming of Christ is necessary to expose the man of lawlessness confirms that agents of Satan are adept at disguising themselves.
 
Last edited:
The dip-in-the-bowl moment for me was in 2001 when the facts came to light regarding the WT's secret partnership with the UN. Remember, the 11 other apostles had no idea Judas was stealing from them and were even still oblivious when Christ handed Judas the morsel. So, it is not surprising that innocent, meek Christians were/are unaware of these evil doings. The fact that the coming of Christ is necessary to expose the man of lawlessness confirms that agents of Satan are adept at disguising themselves.
Good point
 
These articles now make me sick. It's disgusting to how far they have fallen while doing ALL in their power to do hide from the innocent but naive brothers/sisters.
Yes, but the UN cannot become apostate. There is no "front group". The leaders of the Watchtower have been led into apostasy by a man of lawlessness who corresponds to Judas. Judas was an authentic apostle chosen by Christ. He wasn't a frontman for the Romans. He conspired with them.
Are you saying that they are pretty much the one and same thing now?
 
Predictable....Not a word about Ivermectin in the above article.

Yet this is what they said in 1995.
*** g95 10/8 p. 26 River Blindness—Conquering a Terrible Scourge ***
Then, beginning in 1987, another weapon was developed in the fight against river blindness. This time, instead of attacking the blackfly, the target was the parasites inside the human body. The weapon was a safe and effective drug named Mectizan (ivermectin), developed in the laboratories of an American pharmaceutical company.
But I thought that was just horse paste . Anyone would think it had received the Nobel peace prize , and was regarded as a wonder drug .
 
The dip-in-the-bowl moment for me was in 2001 when the facts came to light regarding the WT's secret partnership with the UN. Remember, the 11 other apostles had no idea Judas was stealing from them and were still oblivious even when Christ handed Judas the morsel. So, it is not surprising that innocent, meek Christians were/are unaware of these evil doings. The fact that the coming of Christ is necessary to expose the man of lawlessness confirms that agents of Satan are adept at disguising themselves.
I wonder if it goes back further. Then again Judas was already a trouble maker before the last supper I wonder how far back his treachery really goes. Depending on which gospel, it has been said Jesus knew which "disciple" it would be before that time (I'll have to check incase I miscalculated). Possibly even during the time Jesus was picking disciples. I suppose if that is the case, some apples were bad from the get-go.
 
Is there a definite “dip the bread in the bowl” time in our current timeline that we can point to? (John 13:26)
Since we can't be a fly on the wall, all we can do is guess to try and pinpoint a specific time. Maybe it was a gradual progression. Government tried to stop the preaching work and we stood our ground. They tried to force men into the military to fight their wars, and we went to prison for that also. We used to be opposed to vaccinations but somewhere along the way that changed. Why did it change?
Some people point to the more well known injections and claim that they saved the planet, but did they really? To this day there are problems with the mandatory vaccines and they will get worse as they all become mRNA injections.
If I had to point to a beginning, the vaccination issue is where I would start. Then there is the alteration of the blood issue and some of the wrangling that has happened in connection to that.
Ray Franz had wrote that JWs were using deception in Mexico regarding the ID card that proves military service. If that was true, then why were we trying to appease government at all?
Clearly something happened maybe in the 80s or 90s that marked a shift but it was unseen by us until later. The articles and mentions in the magazines didn't shift to pro-UN until after the late 80s as far as I can recall.
One thing is clear and that is, a decision was made and it wasn't the right one.
 
Since we can't be a fly on the wall, all we can do is guess to try and pinpoint a specific time. Maybe it was a gradual progression. Government tried to stop the preaching work and we stood our ground. They tried to force men into the military to fight their wars, and we went to prison for that also. We used to be opposed to vaccinations but somewhere along the way that changed. Why did it change?
Some people point to the more well known injections and claim that they saved the planet, but did they really? To this day there are problems with the mandatory vaccines and they will get worse as they all become mRNA injections.
If I had to point to a beginning, the vaccination issue is where I would start. Then there is the alteration of the blood issue and some of the wrangling that has happened in connection to that.
Ray Franz had wrote that JWs were using deception in Mexico regarding the ID card that proves military service. If that was true, then why were we trying to appease government at all?
Clearly something happened maybe in the 80s or 90s that marked a shift but it was unseen by us until later. The articles and mentions in the magazines didn't shift to pro-UN until after the late 80s as far as I can recall.
One thing is clear and that is, a decision was made and it wasn't the right one.
The late eighties was the timing of joining U.N also the architecture of Silkeborg's Eye of Horus.
 
Top