Will Animals Be Resurrected?

Interesting topic with so many animal lovers commenting.
I’ve always held the view animals would continue to die in order to remind us of our privilege of extended/everlasting life.
Very possible. And I think it’s important to not forget that Jehovah created the animals and he is putting them under the care of humans but it isn’t up to humans to act or make decisions about animals as though we are their creator. We are the care takers not the creators.
 
Adam was given dominion over the other earthly creatures. Not sure that Adam would have developed a love for other animals either. His relationship with them would have been balanced. I suspect that in the new System Human-Animal relationships will be balanced.

People who do not/have not had pets do not / probably do not form attachments with any particular animal. But may have some affection for any and all animals? The former things will pass away. Among the "former" could be certain attitudes, Likes and dislike, way of thinking?
 
Last edited:
Well, since I can speak freely here without fear of censorship, I'd like to talk about something that I've been considering for awhile: that JW's may have it wrong about the fate of mammals.

Why do I say this? Scriptural support by reasoning on the scriptures:

Genesis 1:28

28 Further, God blessed them, and God said to them: “Be fruitful and become many, fill the earth and subdue it, and have in subjection the fish of the sea and the flying creatures of the heavens and every living creature that is moving on the earth.”

So my reasoning is thus: we know that the Bible says the earth, which was to be "subdued" will exist forever thus Adam and Eve would have also lived forever, if faithful, and so would their children. So, if the earth and humans were to exist forever, and there were three things mentioned in the above verse (they were to care for the animals) then why would they also not have lived forever?

Genesis 2:19

19 Now Jehovah God had been forming from the ground every wild animal of the field and every flying creature of the heavens, and he began bringing them to the man to see what he would call each one; and whatever the man would call each living creature, that became its name.

People name children. They name trees, planets, etc. But Jehovah's very first assignment that he gave to Adam was to name the animals. That is something that humans do to babies. Why do that if Jehovah did not purpose for Adam to have a close relationship with them?

Revelation 21: 4

4 And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away.”

I don't know if any of you have pets, but I personally cried rivers when mine died. It would not be paradise for me to continually, for eternity, have to lose little pets that I've grown attached to


According to these articles, animals grieve when either other animals die or humans die:

http://news.yahoo.com/just-explain-it--animal-grief-153049696.html

9/15/12 WT:

8 Is it really possible for humans to have all the animals in subjection and to be at peace with them? Many people are very close to their pets, such as dogs and cats. What about wild animals, though? One report says: “Scientists who have lived closely with beasts and studied them have found that all mammals are emotional.” Of course, we see animals become frightened or ferocious when they are threatened, but are they capable of what some might describe as tender feelings? The report continues: “It is in the raising of their young that mammals reveal their greatest attribute—their tremendous capacity for warm affection.”


http://animals.pawnation.com/elephants-grieve-3266.html

So, if animals grieve, and humans grieve, then can it really be said that death is "natural" for them?? Does that reflect the loving personality that we know that Jehovah has?

I have more to say on the subject and will do so in the comment section later, due to the questions that I now inevitably will arise, but think about this:

In the New World, there have been species that have gone extinct that Jehovah will bring back. So he has two choices to do this: 1) Recreate that species anew or 2) Resurrect the ones that already had lived before.

Which option seems more consistent with Jehovah's loving personality?

Thoughts?
Nope... think of all the thousands of bugs that perished by hitting our windshields ... definitely wouldn't be fair to them if old fester the cat gets a resurrection.. how could a creature forget knowing his rear-end was the last thing that went through its mind.. Ker-Splat.
 
Last edited:
Nope... think of all the thousands of bugs that perished by hitting our windshields ... definitely wouldn't be fair to them if old fester the cat gets a resurrection.. how could a creature forget the last thing like that, knowing his rear-end was the last thing that went through its mind.. Ker-Splat.
I don't know. I've had some really friendly bug companions in my day. Oscar the potato bug, Kelly the butterfly, Rufus the beetle who was killed in a freak walnut accident. I'll never forget them. Said nobody ever.
 
You had me going there for a second. 😂🤣
I'm only being partly facetious. All Jah's creatures are awesome. I was just relating it back to my original point about God fulfilling some heart's desire to be reunited with a loved animal. Although I can't picture many people wishing for an insect to come back to life, I suppose weirder things have happened. I can't think of an example right now, but there you go.
 
Last edited:
The problem is, we have learned to distrust humans and have learned to trust animals and our pets more.
The thing about our relationships with animals is that people seem to care too much about them in the city than they do on the countryside, where I have seen everyone naming their animals which will be slaughtered. They give them human names too, and they don't mind it at all. When I would visit my friend's family they would take out a portion of the cut meat and say "We're eating Henry" or something like that.

It is out in the city where people think naming animals destined for slaughter is some sort of sacrilege almost.
 
Last edited:
I don't know. I've had some really friendly bug companions in my day. Oscar the potato bug, Kelly the butterfly, Rufus the beetle who was killed in a freak walnut accident. I'll never forget them. Said nobody ever.
Actually I still remember the spider that was killed under my shoe because I had it over trying to protect it from the classmates back in elementary. Didn't name it because it wasn't my pet. But take it how you will haha.
 
There is nothing in the old scrolls indicating that animals have been promised everlasting life.
There might be something about it in the "New Scrolls" prehaps. Don't hold your breath but.
You might find this interesting:


I personally think they are really reaching but I found it an interesting thought. Notice the last verse of the cited scripture.

Imagine a beloved Pet coming back to see you. Who knows...only Jehovah and his son.
 
The unique difference between humans and animals is we were created in "God's Image" unlike the animals Jehovah created beforehand, this entails many things that make us very different from the animal kingdom. One of those things is humans created in God's Image have the prospect of living forever, unlike the animals we are to care for.

So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
Gen 1:27
 
You might find this interesting:


I personally think they are really reaching but I found it an interesting thought. Notice the last verse of the cited scripture.

Imagine a beloved Pet coming back to see you. Who knows...only Jehovah and his son.

The writer/s maybe over thinking things a bit. Creating more questions. Paul was cited by the writer/s as saying that he did not consider himself as having gain a hold of the prize. But no mention was made of Paul later on saying that he had run the race and was confident that he would get his reward.

Verse 30 of Ps 104 does nothing to confirm that animals will be resurrected. Not to me at least. It would be a comforting thought to think that our beloved pets will come back to see us.

B
 
The thing about our relationships with animals is that people seem to care too much about them in the city than they do on the countryside, where I have seen everyone naming their animals which will be slaughtered. They give them human names too, and they don't mind it at all. When I would visit my friend's family they would take out a portion of the cut meat and say "We're eating Henry" or something like that.

It is out in the city where people think naming animals destined for slaughter is some sort of sacrilege almost.
I think city vs country is more cultural than it is city-people-wrong, country-people-right. People who lived in the South had no problem owning slaves, and neither did a majority of their community at the time. It didn't bother their conscious to separate families, or buy, sell, and trade humans. Either they didn't view them as having valid emotions, or didn't care that they did to the extent it changed patterns. Similarly, several societies today don't view animals has having emotion, or care enough that they do. I think it's more about having a frame of reference based on community norms. Your average human is just not that self-aware or objective or motivated to change.
 
The writer/s maybe over thinking things a bit. Creating more questions. Paul was cited by the writer/s as saying that he did not consider himself as having gain a hold of the prize. But no mention was made of Paul later on saying that he had run the race and was confident that he would get his reward.

Verse 30 of Ps 104 does nothing to confirm that animals will be resurrected. Not to me at least. It would be a comforting thought to think that our beloved pets will come back to see us.

B
Yeah, I think it's a stretch too. But remember: "You open your hand and satisfy the desires of every living thing." Psalm 145:16

Someone with a strong desire to see an old friend may be blessed.
 
Top