Jehovah's Witness church seeks exemption from royal commission abuse in care inquiry

Too little too late...and I would argue the changes have been forced by ligation. The fact is they will never admit they did anything wrong ever.

Have they disclosed that they have been fighting a "pandemic" of CSA lawsuits for the last several years, funded by the poorest counties in the world, like the family in the drama? NO!!!
Another excerpt that they do not follow but love to preach:


Refusing to admit that one has made a mistake is like claiming infallibility. The heads of the world’s largest religious organization have for a century claimed that they were infallible, that they did not make any mistake—nor that any popes ever had—when speaking officially on matters of doctrine and morals. But more and more voices are being raised within that very same religious organization questioning this claim. Thus the Roman Catholic bishop, F. Simons, at Indore, India, stated:

“When, even though in good faith, the church exceeds the apostolic testimony about Christ, she has no right to expect that she can teach such additional views with unerring certainty. The Apostles themselves, when demanding faith, appealed to evidence, to what they had heard and seen. . . . Nor is there any divine promise or assurance that the church received such an endowment by virtue of which she can have certainty about Christ independently of the assured contents of the apostolic witness. As soon as she leaves the sure foundation laid by the Apostles, she is subject to the ignorance and errors of her age, which extend, as experience has shown, even to her understanding of the scriptures.

“The claim to infallibility does incalculable harm to the credibility of the church’s teaching authority. It unduly restricts her ability to accept new evidence and makes her the victim and champion of past errors.”—Commonweal, September 25, 1970, pp. 480, 481.

In striking contrast to the position taken by the popes is that taken by the Christian witnesses of Jehovah. They readily admit to having made mistakes as to doctrine and worship.
 
You're an amateur. I have lived this craziness since I was a kid.
Uh, I'm not going to turn this into a pissing contest, but I guarantee you, my background more than qualifies me. Trust me on this one. For anonymity's sake, I won't divulge here, but I shock even prison inmates and psychologists when I share my story. People are shocked when they see how well I've turned out despite what I've been though since I don't "look the part".

My family's picture is next to the word crazy in the dictionary. :rolleyes:

I have totally been the generation to stop the craziness as both my grandmother and mother were alcoholics and both died as a result of it, and I was the only one who didn't get divorced. My parents even told me: "We don't know how we had you. You turned out so different from us."

All credit to Jehovah God.
 
Uh, I'm not going to turn this into a pissing contest, but I guarantee you, my background more than qualifies me. Trust me on this one. For anonymity's sake, I won't divulge here, but I shock even prison inmates and psychologists when I share my story. People are shocked when they see how well I've turned out despite what I've been though since I don't "look the part".

My family's picture is next to the word crazy in the dictionary. :rolleyes:

I have totally been the generation to stop the craziness as both my grandmother and mother were alcoholics and both died as a result of it, and I was the only one who didn't get divorced. My parents even told me: "We don't know how we had you. You turned out so different from us."

All credit to Jehovah God.
I am going to take some liberty here and speak for our brother Nomex. He will likely chime in but I cannot help barging in. When he said you are an amateur he was joking around and having a little fun. I got it right away and thought I should clear that one up for you just in case but I decided not to meddle. But alas, a meddler I am LOL. I am going to go off and read other posts and perhaps meddle some more :ROFLMAO:
 
I am going to take some liberty here and speak for our brother Nomex. He will likely chime in but I cannot help barging in. When he said you are an amateur he was joking around and having a little fun. I got it right away and thought I should clear that one up for you just in case but I decided not to meddle. But alas, a meddler I am LOL. I am going to go off and read other posts and perhaps meddle some more :ROFLMAO:
Exactly....thank you!
 
I am going to take some liberty here and speak for our brother Nomex. He will likely chime in but I cannot help barging in. When he said you are an amateur he was joking around and having a little fun. I got it right away and thought I should clear that one up for you just in case but I decided not to meddle. But alas, a meddler I am LOL. I am going to go off and read other posts and perhaps meddle some more :ROFLMAO:
Thank you for meddling...us surfers just connect...I re-read that, and if not for you I sounded like a complete jerk! Sorry @StopTheInsanity
 
If I had ever caught a Child molester they would have taken him out in a stretcher and if you knew me and my family, you'd know that that is not a threat, because some in my immediate my family beat the crap outta of some JW douche bags back in the day and sent two to the Hospital for a LOT LESS!!!!!!!
If I had ever caught a Child molester they would have taken him out in a stretcher and if you knew me and my family, you'd know that that is not a threat, because some in my immediate my family beat the crap outta of some JW douche bags back in the day and sent two to the Hospital for a LOT LESS!!!!!!!
I'm not sure what religion you are, but I want no part of it. This is banned hate speech in most countries
 
all I don't pretend to know what's going on with all their legal shenanigans
I think the core issue is not whether csa occurs in the org, because it does, just like everywhere else. The key we need to focus on is how the wt handles it. Is is systemic? Is it institutionalized? Is it top down? A case can be made for either side but largely based on speculation.

I grant you that sights like these have contributed to improvements. Litigation also can help. But doesn't this simply verify what we have always known and that is that Jehovah is using imperfect men to accomplish his will. If you think otherwise than you are in effect saying that the devil was right and Jehovah doesn't know how to make his affairs.

The line between speculation and fact is more often than not blurred when it comes to the subject of csa. Those of us on the inside are exposed to different information than those on the outside. More often than not, the casual observer just reads headlines and is not willing to research, but seeks a simple one word answer like a magic charm that will make their problems go away. Just as the saying goes, a lie travels half way around the world before the truth puts its pants on. The wt was blindsided by all this, or if you prefer, they let the ball drop, if then so be it. But where do we go from here?

Speculation- in every case that I have seen a victim contends something like this: 'Elder So and So did nothing to help me' . Okay let's unpack that statement. How are we to analyze it? How are we to test that statement as to its accuracy? How are we to call Elder So and So and cross-examine him. The answer as you all well know is that will never happen. As a consequence we are only left with fertile ground for speculation. Additionally we will never know what efforts that brother made in attempting to right the wrong because, as you prefer to think, the org operates under a veil of secrecy, but I say faithful and discreet. So your opinions on this subject might garner you a free beer at a tea party but they will never hold up in court...deal with it
 
Refusing to admit that one has made a mistake is like claiming infallibility.
Oh puh-lease. Then why does the constitution of the USA,inc guarantee us the right to remain silent? If you are in a police station, the smart thing to do is call an attorney. But if wt says call legal, you cry FOUL. I guess in your world we are guilty until proven innocent.
 
There have been a lot of changes in the organization from all the lawsuits and so now it appears that everyone is on the same page:
It is true that the WT has changed its policies. But, in their dishonesty, they pretend that the present policies were always in place. It is virtually impossible for the Watchtower to be truthful. It would take the sparkle off the organization/idol that they have worked so hard to spit shine.
 
Oh puh-lease. Then why does the constitution of the USA,inc guarantee us the right to remain silent? If you are in a police station, the smart thing to do is call an attorney. But if wt says call legal, you cry FOUL. I guess in your world we are guilty until proven innocent.
My dear, that is a direct quote from a WT article. If you have an issue with that statement, then you can write headquarters directly about it. I provided the link for the article.
I think the core issue is not whether csa occurs in the org, because it does, just like everywhere else. The key we need to focus on is how the wt handles it. Is is systemic? Is it institutionalized? Is it top down? A case can be made for either side but largely based on speculation.

I grant you that sights like these have contributed to improvements. Litigation also can help. But doesn't this simply verify what we have always known and that is that Jehovah is using imperfect men to accomplish his will. If you think otherwise than you are in effect saying that the devil was right and Jehovah doesn't know how to make his affairs.

The line between speculation and fact is more often than not blurred when it comes to the subject of csa. Those of us on the inside are exposed to different information than those on the outside. More often than not, the casual observer just reads headlines and is not willing to research, but seeks a simple one word answer like a magic charm that will make their problems go away. Just as the saying goes, a lie travels half way around the world before the truth puts its pants on. The wt was blindsided by all this, or if you prefer, they let the ball drop, if then so be it. But where do we go from here?

Speculation- in every case that I have seen a victim contends something like this: 'Elder So and So did nothing to help me' . Okay let's unpack that statement. How are we to analyze it? How are we to test that statement as to its accuracy? How are we to call Elder So and So and cross-examine him. The answer as you all well know is that will never happen. As a consequence we are only left with fertile ground for speculation. Additionally we will never know what efforts that brother made in attempting to right the wrong because, as you prefer to think, the org operates under a veil of secrecy, but I say faithful and discreet. So your opinions on this subject might garner you a free beer at a tea party but they will never hold up in court...deal with it
I think the core issue is not whether csa occurs in the org, because it does, just like everywhere else. The key we need to focus on is how the wt handles it. Is is systemic? Is it institutionalized? Is it top down? A case can be made for either side but largely based on speculation.

How has WT handled it? Before the law suits, by covering it up. After the lawsuits, by handling it the way that that they should have handled it in the first place. I have direct experience with this as do others, so it is not mere "speculation" but first-hand experience. If you deny that, then you are no different than WT denying the abuse allegations.

So, by not dealing with it promptly, yes, it is institutionalized and top down.

But doesn't this simply verify what we have always known and that is that Jehovah is using imperfect men to accomplish his will. If you think otherwise than you are in effect saying that the devil was right and Jehovah doesn't know how to make his affairs.

VERY twisted reasoning here. And, I might add, very "devilish". There is a difference between weakness and wickedness. It's weakness if it's a "one and done" and people apologize when their error is pointed out. This is a long-term repeated behavior that, like Esau, only brought "repentance" when they were caught and forced into change by a $35 million lawsuit. That is not imperfection. Imperfection is when you are chronically late. Imperfection is stuttering. Covering up CSA is not imperfection. It is wicked.
Those of us on the inside are exposed to different information than those on the outside. More often than not, the casual observer just reads headlines and is not willing to research, but seeks a simple one word answer like a magic charm that will make their problems go away. Just as the saying goes, a lie travels half way around the world before the truth puts its pants on. The wt was blindsided by all this, or if you prefer, they let the ball drop, if then so be it.

You make it sound like you have such "insider knowledge". If so, please do share. I'm all ears. However, I have come by way of my knowledge of how things are handled by direct personal experience. I helped "talk down from the ledge" a sister who had a knife to her throat because she was despondent after calling Bethel talking about her abusive father and them telling her that she had to forgive him because Jehovah forgave Manasseh and that is also what her local elders told her. I had to push for her to get justice and finally a district overseer got involved and told the elders to apologize to her and told her father to pay her therapy bills. This was not a "mistake". We got the results we did only because I refused to let the issue go.

As for my sister-in-law, she never got justice and may have lost her life to suicide due to drugs by living on the streets. She, also, was told to forgive her abuser. So I have two first-hand stories. One turned out sorta well and the other didn't.

Speculation- in every case that I have seen a victim contends something like this: 'Elder So and So did nothing to help me' . Okay let's unpack that statement. How are we to analyze it? How are we to test that statement as to its accuracy? How are we to call Elder So and So and cross-examine him. The answer as you all well know is that will never happen. As a consequence we are only left with fertile ground for speculation. Additionally we will never know what efforts that brother made in attempting to right the wrong because, as you prefer to think, the org operates under a veil of secrecy, but I say faithful and discreet. So your opinions on this subject might garner you a free beer at a tea party but they will never hold up in court...deal with it

As I've already shown, I have personal experience with seeing what elders have/have not done to help these women. I find your statements REPULSIVE. Honestly, I am going to ask that you seek professional help. There is a reason that you are in denial about this and find this so triggering. It is clear that you cannot be unbiased and neutral about this and have an agenda to keep your fantasy about WT's innocence in place to protect your own psyche. Having WT be wicked does not negate the Bible or Jehovah since several Israelite kings did equally wicked things and yet Jehovah still save and directed his people.

What Robert is doing is presenting the facts, however ugly they may be, so that people are not stumbled, and can work through Bible study to built up their faith in Jehovah's justice and power to save. It takes a brave person to do what he is doing. Now, I do not idolize Robert nor necessarily agree with him on everything, nor do I get the impression that he wants me to do either.

He is simply being a "watchman" by showing what IS and then showing what Jehovah is doing to do about it and telling the rest of us to prepare our hearts for what's coming so that we are not stumbled or misdirected like the Witnesses were by taking the vaccine.

So, why do you still defend the WT about the direction they gave regarding the vaccine despite your own family members being vaccine injured? This was not a "one-off" mistake; it's happened before.

In the November 22, 1976 AW, there was an article:


In it, they quoted "trusted authorities" saying that the flu vaccine was "safe and effective".
But this is what happened. I want you to watch this 15 minute video:


So, not only did WT not learn its lesson, they repeated it. What really shows the wickedness, is that hundreds, if not thousands, of elders and publishers have written in about these injuries and deaths only to be threatened with disfellowshipping for "causing divisions" or silenced or not responded to. I have direct personal experience with this. It is not mere "speculation". Your explaining this away as "imperfection" is showing just how biased and callous you are being, not to mention DISLOYAL to your own family members. If I was related to you, you would have been cut off permanently by me by now. I would absolutely refuse to speak with you. With "friends" like you, who needs enemies? You are essentially approving of "gang medical rape" by saying that being socially pressured into taking a vaccine by being excluded from the theocratic schools because you are not vaccinated is acceptable policy that is simple "a mistake".

They know about the vaccine injuries and deaths because people have written in to them about it. And yet: SILENCE. That is not innocence.

I think that you are a troll who is here to waste people's time and to get information possibly. I think you enjoy the reactions you are getting here. So I personally, am going to quit feeding you. It is very apparent that you are not a lover of righteousness or justice or that you bear any semblance of reasonableness.

I truly do wish you well and that you get some help as to why you are so triggered if you are indeed sincere. It is clear that this is troubling you inside otherwise you would not be here.
 
Last edited:
I am going to take some liberty here and speak for our brother Nomex. He will likely chime in but I cannot help barging in. When he said you are an amateur he was joking around and having a little fun. I got it right away and thought I should clear that one up for you just in case but I decided not to meddle. But alas, a meddler I am LOL. I am going to go off and read other posts and perhaps meddle some more :ROFLMAO:
Are you a "medi-tator" or "Mediator". ;)

Either way, they're both good. :cool:
 
I suggest you read the testimony of Barbara Anderson.
I read her testimony. Here again like a broken record, we have no corroboration. We can't cross examine...we just have to take her word for it. Her own son won't talk to her.
 
My dear, that is a direct quote from a WT article. If you have an issue with that statement, then you can write headquarters directly about it. I provided the link for the article.
Touché...! However my point still stands, everyone has a right to remain silent. Jesus was mute before his shearer. Silence does not mean guilt. Furthermore the wt does not claim infallibility and never has.

WT denying the abuse allegations.
Wrong...you're off in the weeds again. Try and focus... the wt never confirms or denies anything. The focus is not if abuse occurs, but rather how it is dealt with.

not dealing with it promptly, yes, it is institutionalized
Touché, this is the discussion we should be having, however it's nuanced and not black and white.

There is a difference between weakness and wickedness. It's weakness
Agreed, but you still haven't proven either. I think we need to work together to unravel this.

$35 million lawsuit.
Overturned on appeal. You need to start reading more than outdated headlines.

helped "talk down from the ledge" a sister who had a knife to her throat because she was despondent after calling Bethel talking about her abusive father and them telling her that she had to forgive him because Jehovah forgave Manasseh and that is also what her local elders told her. I had to push for her to get justice and finally a district overseer got involved and told the elders to apologize to her and told her father to pay her therapy bills. This was not a "mistake". We got the results we did only because I refused to let the issue go.
Good for you, and I mean that in all earnest. However this contradicts your assertion that this is top down.

my sister-in-law, she never got justice and may have lost her life to suicide due to drugs
The number two cause of suicide is drugs from big pharma that you are so in love with. They are not here to "help" anyone except themselves.

I have two first-hand stories
No you don't. You have one persons one-sided story. Where is the testimony from the elders you are blaming ? Curiously absent in this witch hunt.

why do you still defend the WT about the direction they gave regarding the vaccine despite your own family members being vaccine injured? This was not a "one-off" mistake; it's happened before.
I don't... that's why I came here. But that has nothing to do with csa
 
I read her testimony. Here again like a broken record, we have no corroboration. We can't cross examine...we just have to take her word for it. Her own son won't talk to her.
Because she was disfellowshipped for supposedly causing division and her husband also for not keeping his wife in check. I don’t think that you have the ability to recognise truthful people , with integrity. You clearly like to play devils advocate with everything and everyone.
 
Top