MARRIAGE - Christian ONLY institution. Soooooo.....Government, You are dismissed.

RTAW

Active member


This article is the epitome of the best explanation of how Satan HAS CONFISCATED Jehovah's property.
And there are times I personally feel one must make a judgement call.

The preacher who wrote this article might be a broken clock, but he would still be right twice a day, I believe this is one of those times.
 

יהוה_saves

Well-known member


This article is the epitome of the best explanation of how Satan HAS CONFISCATED Jehovah's property.
And there are times I personally feel one must make a judgement call.

The preacher who wrote this article might be a broken clock, but he would still be right twice a day, I believe this is one of those times.
number two is different where i live. the common law practice of “in parentis loco” or in place of the parents gives schools and other institutions absolute jurisdiction over children when their parents are absent. it’s an insidious legal theory that should be stayed by operation of public policy.
 
Last edited:

RTAW

Active member
goodness, it brings to mind Melissa Harris Perry;s statement " We need to acknowledge that children don't belong to their parents but belong to whole communities" .....creepy removal of Individualism and personal sovereignty.
 

Maskita

Well-known member
I've always known this. Modern marriage is a huge money making scam. It primarily has nothing to do with Jehovah or commitment anymore. A cheap wedding can cost many thousands of dollars. Stupid dresses, huge over priced cakes. I don't think that's what Jehovah means by marriage. Adam and Eve could be said to have been married. But they were just committed to each other. They didn't need all that other crap. The meaning behind the marriage is infinitely more important than a stupid ceremony and a piece of paper.

Just an FYI, I can't stand this guy in the following video. He's a regressive beta male loser. But I pretty much agree with this video regardless. Like someone mentioned earlier, even a broken clock is right twice a day -- assuming it's not digital, broken digital watches are always wrong, which may explain why the digital world is so full of _ _ _ _. But I digress.

 

The God Pill

Well-known member
Haven't watched the videos above but marriage licenses in the US were originally invented to suppress interracial marriage so not a good origin. If everyone grasped what it really means to register, license, certify and incorporate something as well as to give ones signature almost no one would legally formalize there union. Without elaborating in a conversation with my mother literally refered to the paperwork as a satanic slave contract that I would never subject the products of a marriage (the children) to. This process of incorporating a marriage is the definition of allowing room for the devil and God is the authority over any marriage covenant I make with a women in the future not the devil or the 1871 US corporation. Even if the paperwork didn't put people's unions in the law of the sea and possibly even more subject than otherwise to the marine kingdom why on God's earth would I acknowledge the legitimacy of the state supplanting God's authority over matrimony when it's Jehovah that defines what marriage is and the wicked ones governments grant legal recognition to Sodomite and Lesbian marriages? That's like taking biology class from people that say men can get pregnant. My name and whoever would be my spouses as well as any information I research that may be needed will be written in a bible in a format that does not go against our interest that will be kept. That will suffice for me in the paperwork aspect.
 
Last edited:

Biblebug

Member
No ceremony is necessary. But the couple have an obligation to family and friends including any congregations invoked. They (every one else with a stake) have a right to know that you are 'married' and not just sleeping together. They have another right in addition to that, and that is to treat you like a tax collector or a man of the nations if you dont marry. The law of the land would be another issue.
 

The God Pill

Well-known member
No ceremony is necessary. But the couple have an obligation to family and friends including any congregations invoked. They have a right to know that your are 'married' and not just sleeping together. They have another right in addition to that, and that is to treat you like a tax collector or a man of the nations if you dont marry.
Certainly awareness of people's position as married is included in marriage being honorable among you. Abraham and Sarah in Egypt come to mind how poorly it went when there being spouses wasnt made clear to others.
 
Last edited:

Biblebug

Member
Certainly awareness of people's position as married is included in marriage being honorable among you. Abraham and Sarah in Egypt come to mind how poorly it went when there being spouses wasnt made clear to others.
Satan's world dont care and reap their reward (broken hearts, unwanted baby's, disease, abortions etc etc) for ignoring Gods wisdom. Personal if the couple fulfill Gods requirements I'm happy to be called their brother, (without any hoopla) as to Caesars laws that's for them to sort, none of my business at this point.
 

RTAW

Active member
I've always known this. Modern marriage is a huge money making scam. It primarily has nothing to do with Jehovah or commitment anymore. A cheap wedding can cost many thousands of dollars. Stupid dresses, huge over priced cakes. I don't think that's what Jehovah means by marriage. Adam and Eve could be said to have been married. But they were just committed to each other. They didn't need all that other crap. The meaning behind the marriage is infinitely more important than a stupid ceremony and a piece of paper.

Just an FYI, I can't stand this guy in the following video. He's a regressive beta male loser. But I pretty much agree with this video regardless. Like someone mentioned earlier, even a broken clock is right twice a day -- assuming it's not digital, broken digital watches are always wrong, which may explain why the digital world is so full of _ _ _ _. But I digress.


i agree I was not really a fan of this guy but this does make perfect sense.
 

Posstot

Well-known member
goodness, it brings to mind Melissa Harris Perry;s statement " We need to acknowledge that children don't belong to their parents but belong to whole communities" .....creepy removal of Individualism and personal sovereignty.
Brilliant Marxist idea: All children belong to the State who outsources the financial burden of raising them to the parents. It's a s win-win-win situation.
 

The God Pill

Well-known member
I'm reviving the thread because I saw the phrase "living in sin" in a recent thread and wanted to reaffirm that I will not place any future covenant marriage under the marine kingdoms legal matrix and hence under the spiritual jurisdiction of my primary nemesis in spiritual warfare (the "queen of the coast") to appease men regardless of any social exclusion I and any wife in the future would face in regard to the org.
 
Last edited:

Driven

Well-known member
I'm reviving the thread because I saw the phrase "living in sin" in a recent thread and wanted to reaffirm that I will not place any future covenant marriage under the marine kingdoms legal matrix and hence under the spiritual jurisdiction of my primary nemesis in spiritual warfare to appease men regardless of any social exclusion I and any wife in the future would face in regard to the org.
I don’t know what you mean and I don’t know what a “marine kingdom’s legal matrix” is.
 

PJ54

Well-known member
I don’t know what you mean and I don’t know what a “marine kingdom’s legal matrix” is.
Basically, when you & your spouse get a marriage license, the state has some power over the relationship. It's part of the reason why the state can enforce the parents to pay for their child's transition even if they oppose. It's some dirty politics.
 

Driven

Well-known member
Basically, when you & your spouse get a marriage license, the state has some power over the relationship. It's part of the reason why the state can enforce the parents to pay for their child's transition even if they oppose. It's some dirty politics.
Wow. Who knew?? I‘m so glad that I’m well past child-bearing. We were warned weren’t we.
 

PJ54

Well-known member
Wow. Who knew?? I‘m so glad that I’m well past child-bearing. We were warned weren’t we.
It's frustrating since the Org makes it clear that you need to get the license depending on the law. It makes the situation where it alters the 3 fold cord since the state is now the arbiter rather than Jehovah.
 

The God Pill

Well-known member
I don’t know what you mean and I don’t know what a “marine kingdom’s legal matrix” is.
The matrix talk isn't that meaningful matrix means womb because of the movies people associate the term with simulated realities but if you notice in the film neo literally wakes up in an artificial womb when he's first unplugged. I use the term mostly to reference how much of this law of the sea garbage imposed upon humanity by deceit and more or less coming from the Phoenician Canaanites ultimately revolves around the birth certificate process. Marine kingdom is a term deliverance ministers use for an alleged segment of devil's operation the notion being that Adam was not given dominion over the sea (birds and fish but not sea itself) the way he was over the land in genesis and this makes the marine and/or coastal based/associated spirits the most of a threat/nuisance/challenge. A few people that buy this notion connect the role of the land being flooded over in the legal sense with the expansion of maritime law over nations and landmasses etc as connected to the marine kingdom and associated entities. I can say firsthand they aren't happy I went down that rabbit hole of research.
 
Last edited:

Driven

Well-known member
The matrix talk isn't that meaningful matrix means womb do the movies people associate the term with simulated realities but if you notice in the film neo literally wakes up in an artificial womb when he's first unplugged. I use the term mostly to reference how much of this law of the sea garbage imposed upon humanity by deceit and more or less coming from the Phoenician Canaanites ultimately revolves around the birth certificate process. Marine kingdom is a term deliverance ministers use for an alleged segment of devil's operation the notion being that Adam was not given dominion over the sea (birds and fish but not sea itself) the way he was over the land in genesis and this makes the marine and/or coastal based/associated spirits the most of a threat/nuisance/challenge. A few people that buy this notion connect the role of the land being flooded over in the legal sense with the expansion of maritime law over nations and landmasses etc as connected to the marine kingdom and associated entities. I can say firsthand they aren't happy I went down that rabbit hole of research.
I am learning.
 

Driven

Well-known member
The matrix talk isn't that meaningful matrix means womb because of the movies people associate the term with simulated realities but if you notice in the film neo literally wakes up in an artificial womb when he's first unplugged. I use the term mostly to reference how much of this law of the sea garbage imposed upon humanity by deceit and more or less coming from the Phoenician Canaanites ultimately revolves around the birth certificate process. Marine kingdom is a term deliverance ministers use for an alleged segment of devil's operation the notion being that Adam was not given dominion over the sea (birds and fish but not sea itself) the way he was over the land in genesis and this makes the marine and/or coastal based/associated spirits the most of a threat/nuisance/challenge. A few people that buy this notion connect the role of the land being flooded over in the legal sense with the expansion of maritime law over nations and landmasses etc as connected to the marine kingdom and associated entities. I can say firsthand they aren't happy I went down that rabbit hole of research.
Off topic question for you, Bro TGP, in the revised NWT at Rev 9:7 it describes the locusts faces as “human” faces but in the prior translation of the NWT it said “men’s” faces. What did the original Greek actually say? Thanks in advance.
 
Top