MARRIAGE - Christian ONLY institution. Soooooo.....Government, You are dismissed.

The God Pill

Well-known member
The word is anthropon so men's faces. It would actually make sense in the interpretation of released watchers context to describe them with women's hair because one of several layers of Paul's mentioning head coverings was because in the first century due to the poor quality of medical science in Roman times a woman's long hair was viewed as analogous to a man's testicles (there's a chapter in reversing hermon on this) and so a woman without a headcovering at church was seen as comparable to a priest entering the tabernacle nude. Describing the locusts as having uncovered women's hair especially in an androgynous chimeric cthonic context could suggests uncleanness if the locusts are the 200 released for 150 days corresponding to the flood.

Genesis 7:24 And the waters continued overwhelming the earth a hundred and fifty days.
Off topic question for you, Bro TGP, in the revised NWT at Rev 9:7 it describes the locusts faces as “human” faces but in the prior translation of the NWT it said “men’s” faces. What did the original Greek actually say? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:

Ms_ladyblue

Well-known member
I was just referring to the terms that TGP uses. I am learning to understand what he is saying. Not saying I agree or disagree but I hear him.
@Driven
I guess I didn’t quite understand. So sorry, I didn’t read it through, just assumed 🙄 since everything is so crazy now. Therefore I digress…

Sheesh! I should have stayed off this thread. 😳
 

Soul Sage

Active member
There was no government during Adam and Eve's time. No weddings either. They became married as one flesh since they first had sexual relations. Jesus Christ also called out the woman's sins he met at the water well. For Jesus Christ knew that she had multiple husbands. It didn't mean she was married to them all but it meant that she would sleep around with multiple different men so it was like she had more than one husband. At this the woman could tell he was the Messiah as no one else knew this. It also proves that marriage is a public event of union but first time sex is the private event of union and what officially makes them as one flesh.
 

Driven

Well-known member
The word is anthropon so men's faces. It would actually make sense in the interpretation of released watchers context to describe them with women's hair because one of several layers of Paul's mentioning head coverings was because in the first century due to the poor quality of medical science in Roman times a woman's long hair was viewed as analogous to a man's testicles (there's a chapter in reversing hermon on this) and so a woman without a headcovering at church was seen as comparable to a priest entering the tabernacle nude. Describing the locusts as having uncovered women's hair especially in an androgynous chimeric cthonic context could suggests uncleanness if the locusts are the 200 released for 150 days corresponding to the flood.

Genesis 7:24 And the waters continued overwhelming the earth a hundred and fifty days.
Wow. Interesting info. Thanks.
 

Driven

Well-known member
The word is anthropon so men's faces. It would actually make sense in the interpretation of released watchers context to describe them with women's hair because one of several layers of Paul's mentioning head coverings was because in the first century due to the poor quality of medical science in Roman times a woman's long hair was viewed as analogous to a man's testicles (there's a chapter in reversing hermon on this) and so a woman without a headcovering at church was seen as comparable to a priest entering the tabernacle nude. Describing the locusts as having uncovered women's hair especially in an androgynous chimeric cthonic context could suggests uncleanness if the locusts are the 200 released for 150 days corresponding to the flood.

Genesis 7:24 And the waters continued overwhelming the earth a hundred and fifty days.
One more question. Is the word anthropon ever translated as “human” instead of “men” or could it refer to either a man or a woman?
 

The God Pill

Well-known member
The related word anthropos is masculine but can occasionally be used in reference to humankind going by the concordance anthropon is used biblically much more consistently though not exclusively in the masculine than anthropos. Anthro = man gyne = women hence the related term andro followed by gyne is used for this alchemical blurring of the gender boundaries the social engineers are attempting on society.

 
Last edited:

Paz

Well-known member


This article is the epitome of the best explanation of how Satan HAS CONFISCATED Jehovah's property.
And there are times I personally feel one must make a judgement call.

The preacher who wrote this article might be a broken clock, but he would still be right twice a day, I believe this is one of those times.
Hi RTAW
As Christians did Not Jesus say give ‘Caesars things to Caesar’ Law abiding Jews obeyed Roman Law that included censors that included Jesus registration . He even miraculously gave a coin to Peter to pay Temple tax. Ceasar is the superior authority that we as Christians are commanded to obey. Ceasars laws are designed to protect us , traffic laws, criminal laws (that include child abuse) and marriage laws that protect the family when family members are sick or die. So I really can’t understand your views . Anybody who gains a marriage that is not legal is not really legally committing themselves to an honest marriage, how can they really love their partner? It’s like inventing your own home made driving licence and driving on the highway. As a driving teacher that horrifies me. Sorry Mate!
 

Paz

Well-known member
I've always known this. Modern marriage is a huge money making scam. It primarily has nothing to do with Jehovah or commitment anymore. A cheap wedding can cost many thousands of dollars. Stupid dresses, huge over priced cakes. I don't think that's what Jehovah means by marriage. Adam and Eve could be said to have been married. But they were just committed to each other. They didn't need all that other crap. The meaning behind the marriage is infinitely more important than a stupid ceremony and a piece of paper.

Just an FYI, I can't stand this guy in the following video. He's a regressive beta male loser. But I pretty much agree with this video regardless. Like someone mentioned earlier, even a broken clock is right twice a day -- assuming it's not digital, broken digital watches are always wrong, which may explain why the digital world is so full of _ _ _ _. But I digress.

This video is an argument against lawful marriage. My last wedding cost under $200 (a state ceremony) that included the reception and the dress, flowers etc, so those engaged in the celebration can marry legally without it costing much, it is a choice, Many weddings at the Kingdom Hall can be even cheaper since the brothers get together provide the foods music the ceremony for free as a gift of brotherly love. So brothers why this daft argument? It tells me some of you have never been in the ‘truth’. Have not seen brotherly love in action ❤️
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
License is oftentimes just another word for tax. They had to squeeze money out of us somehow. As Paz points out, in this secular world we live in there can be sound reasons for wanting legal status. Widow’s benefits and pensions are based on legal status. This is one of the issues that the gay/lesbian people have fought over so that they could leave this world knowing their partner would continue to be able to live. No small thing that.
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
This video is an argument against lawful marriage. My last wedding cost under $200 (a state ceremony) that included the reception and the dress, flowers etc, so those engaged in the celebration can marry legally without it costing much, it is a choice, Many weddings at the Kingdom Hall can be even cheaper since the brothers get together provide the foods music the ceremony for free as a gift of brotherly love. So brothers why this daft argument? It tells me some of you have never been in the ‘truth’. Have not seen brotherly love in action ❤️
Isn’t marriage celebration also for the benefit of the friends? It’s not like we have a slew of things we celebrate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paz

The God Pill

Well-known member
It's not paying Ceasar's things to ceaser lol it's rejecting God as the authority that invented the union by forming a corporation under the 1871 corporation masquerading as the government something that defiles your marriage enslaves your children and makes them lawful prey of the demons prowling the delivery rooms of hospitals. To the contrary it's not rendering God his due. Caesar abdicates any pretention of authority in this field by endorsing sodomite marriage as a thing.
 

The God Pill

Well-known member
Excerpt of Tertullian's On Idolatry

“The things which are Caesar’s are to be rendered to Caesar.” It is enough that He set in apposition thereto, “and to God the things which are God’s.” What things, then, are Caesar’s? Those, to wit, about which the consultation was then held, whether the poll-tax should be furnished to Caesar or no. Therefore, too, the Lord demanded that the money should be shown Him, and inquired about the image, whose it was; and when He had heard it was Caesar’s, said, “Render to Caesar what are Caesar’s, and what are God’s to God;” that is, the image of Caesar, which is on the coin, to Caesar, and the image of God, which is on man, to God; so as to render to Caesar indeed money, to God yourself. Otherwise, what will be God’s, if all things are Caesar’s?
 

Driven

Well-known member
This video is an argument against lawful marriage. My last wedding cost under $200 (a state ceremony) that included the reception and the dress, flowers etc, so those engaged in the celebration can marry legally without it costing much, it is a choice, Many weddings at the Kingdom Hall can be even cheaper since the brothers get together provide the foods music the ceremony for free as a gift of brotherly love. So brothers why this daft argument? It tells me some of you have never been in the ‘truth’. Have not seen brotherly love in action ❤️
Paz, I haven’t seen RTAW on the forum for months. Also he studies but is not baptized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paz
Top