In the Image of God

James1:​

13 When under trial,+ let no one say: “I am being tried by God.” For with evil things God cannot be tried nor does he himself try anyone. 14 But each one is tried by being drawn out and enticed* by his own desire.+ 15 Then the desire, when it has become fertile, gives birth to sin;+ in turn, sin, when it has been accomplished, brings forth death.+

"But each one is tried by being drawn out and enticed by his own desire."
* Footnote
Or, “caught as by bait.” Lit., “being baited on.”

...
I don't think its fair when people simply post scripture intending to make a point in a discussion, simply for the fact it leaves the reader responsible for interpreting what they think the person is trying to say, and more often than not, in doing so, will arrive at a different conclusion than its intended purpose. It's an intellectually dishonest way of discussing things, and if you cannot elucidate a simple explanation of your intent or meaning behind these scriptures, please don't post them arbitrarily to me as if I can read your mind. Obviously, I can infer some sort of conclusion regarding what I think you mean, but why do you force me to speculate when you could simply make it clear in a few sentences. Bk Kevin, I am asking you please, to take a little more time in your replies or is this discussion not worthy of your full consideration?

I have provided reasoning why the 'us' in the scripture you provided from Gen 3:22 Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad," was not referring to the angelic creation, but rather was a statement between Jehovah and Jesus Christ-US. The same 'us' as when he tells Jesus "Let us make man in our image...". Obviously, he is not talking to the angels because the angels didn't make us, nor were we made in their image. I hope that clarifies that distinction.

To maintain a pure and perfect creation, any knowledge of bad would have been established or determined prior to creation, through the formation of standards. These standards are the perfect laws that govern our existence down to the minutest detail. This is no doubt how Jehovah and Jesus- us, knew what bad or evil was, because they themselves set the standards before the creation of all other entities.

Because a standard cannot be determined until first the limits of that standard are known, thus determining good and bad, it is clear that Jehovah and Jesus knew what these limits were when they set the foundation of the heavens and the universe, and all that exists within them. This was all done PRIOR to creation, when they were designing and calculating the expense of creation and all that it entails.

(Lu 14:28) “. . .For example, who of YOU that wants to build a tower does not first sit down and calculate the expense. . .”

To again use light as an illustration, the standard of light is set to 182,282 m/s. When Jehovah and Jesus Christ set this the standard apparently 183,000 m/s was bad, or beyond the limits of what their intended purpose for light was to do. Certainly, the same is true for all standards set, as to go beyond them is bad, and not conducive to a functioning universe.

Of course, physical laws are different than moral laws wherein the concept of free will lies. Physical standards and laws are not governed by the individual, but rather the existing physical statutes that are demonstrably set in stone, whereas free will is entirely governed by the one in which it resides regarding to what extreme it will be used. Although we can manipulate light to a certain degree, the standard will always be 182,282m/s, we cannot go beyond the standard, ever, and this axiom of truth will remain forever constant for all eternity.

Free will also has a standard, yet, built within the framework of free will is the ability to go beyond that standard as determined by the one who chooses to do so. We have the capacity to choose to go beyond the standards of love, joy, peace, long suffering, kindness etc..etc. and choose to do evil if we so desire. I believe this is where your scriptures above are pointing, but as I said I am only inferring your intent. Nevertheless, one can only have the knowledge of going beyond that standard of free will by the act, or creation, of doing so.

In other words, the only way one can grasp what it is like to go beyond the standard, that has been built into the framework of free will, is by choosing to create evil. Prior to the moment Satan went beyond that standard and created evil, no entity within creation had ever ventured beyond that standard, thus nobody knew what it was like to do evil, or bad. No one possessed awareness or knowledge of what it felt like to create evil, as it had never occurred since the inception of creation by Jehovah and Jesus Christ.

Does that mean that Satan wasn't aware of what badness was? NO! He was most certainly cognizant of the standard regulated by the conscience within him. He KNEW that exceeding that standard was bad. He was fully conscious that surpassing that standard would violate the law of free will, and that once he transgressed it by creating sin, he would be deviating from God's purpose ingrained within him to the core of his being. He understood that once he created sin, he would not only possess knowledge of good, which he had since his creation, but he would now also have knowledge of bad by surpassing the mandate of goodness dictated by free will.

Hence, the name of the tree, the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, could just as easily be dubbed the Tree of Knowledge of Free Will, given that until the precise moment of Satan's transgression, the potential to surpass the standard of free will had not yet been realized. There existed no precedent for such an event in all of history, limiting their knowledge solely to the perpetuation of goodness that had prevailed for eons. This occurrence set a precedent for the law of free will within creation, which had not been fully established prior.

Indeed, there is compelling reasoning to support this assertion. If Adam and Eve had abstained from consuming from the tree and still retained only the knowledge of creating good, the tree would still be named the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. This designation reflects the manifestation of what it symbolized into creation when Satan utilized his ability to sin, thereby acquiring the knowledge of both good and evil, which up unto this point had only been known by Jehovah and Jesus Christ.

As the scripture you provided so clearly states 'we are drawn out by our own desire'. Satan's desire to be worshipped blinded him to the standard, causing him to ignore the built-in conscience he had been given to guide his use of free will, and in doing so his creation would not reflect love back to Jehovah but rather hate, malice intent, selfishness, etc..etc. These bad reflections had never been experienced before within creation, and most certainly reverberated throughout, and the concept of sin could now be associated to an actual event. The angels would now have true knowledge of what it means to go beyond the standard, and actually create evil.

@Bk Kevin and @BARNABY THE DOG. , I hope this helps you to understand more clearly the perspective from my point of view. It has been a struggle for me to provide a clearer presentation of what it means to say that 'we cannot know something that does not yet exist' as it pertains to the creation of sin, and how this lack of knowledge prevented the standard of free will to be full recognized within creation. I stand firm by what I present, however if you still feel compelled to believe that the angels had knowledge of the creation of sin, evil, prior to Satans transgression, and that they could clearly explain what it felt like to have hate, malice, selfishness within them before the evil act occurred, I am open to your reasoning.
 
Last edited:
Jehovah is Great and Almighty and he can handle any unforseen situation that can occur regarding to His inteligent creation. He is fair though. He does not condemn anyone to live forever while not agreeing with his laws and commandments which will govern the heavens and the earth.

Jesus was created in Jehovah's image and after that all other creation was made in their image. Evil and sin did not enter the heavens or the earth before it had happened. However, the potential for evil to be brought about was there, as Jehovah considered this hypothetical situation when he gave the newly created beings the free will. It is a lot we don't know about what went in heaven before the human race was created, but the bible declares that the Satan was a righteous spirit in all his ways and he was fully obedient to Jehovah

After Satan rebelled and Adam joined him, the sin entered the world and a whole new situation emerged. From then on, every being that will become part of Jehovah's new aranjament has to prove their loyalty trough faith and love towards Jehovah and Jesus as well as for the new aranjament that Jehovah put forward. In this way, the new world will have unshakeable foundations and the laws of God will never be challenged ever again. Even if there will be other individuals who will rebel, the justice will be swiftly enforced, and all the other beings in existence will fully support that righteous decision.
 
Jehovah is Great and Almighty and he can handle any unforseen situation that can occur regarding to His inteligent creation. He is fair though. He does not condemn anyone to live forever while not agreeing with his laws and commandments which will govern the heavens and the earth.

Jesus was created in Jehovah's image and after that all other creation was made in their image. Evil and sin did not enter the heavens or the earth before it had happened. However, the potential for evil to be brought about was there, as Jehovah considered this hypothetical situation when he gave the newly created beings the free will. It is a lot we don't know about what went in heaven before the human race was created, but the bible declares that the Satan was a righteous spirit in all his ways and he was fully obedient to Jehovah

After Satan rebelled and Adam joined him, the sin entered the world and a whole new situation emerged. From then on, every being that will become part of Jehovah's new aranjament has to prove their loyalty trough faith and love towards Jehovah and Jesus as well as for the new aranjament that Jehovah put forward. In this way, the new world will have unshakeable foundations and the laws of God will never be challenged ever again. Even if there will be other individuals who will rebel, the justice will be swiftly enforced, and all the other beings in existence will fully support that righteous decision.
Overall I agree with your comments. I think 'unforseen situation' is a slight misstatement in that I believe Jehovah foresaw any sitiuation and had set up solutions for whatever might happen. As far as Jesus being created, I know I'm probably in the minority in thinking that he wasn't created. At least I haven't read a scripture that he was. If someone can point one out to me, it will be appreciated.
 
Overall I agree with your comments. I think 'unforseen situation' is a slight misstatement in that I believe Jehovah foresaw any sitiuation and had set up solutions for whatever might happen. As far as Jesus being created, I know I'm probably in the minority in thinking that he wasn't created. At least I haven't read a scripture that he was. If someone can point one out to me, it will be appreciated.
Col 1:15 "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."
 
Col 1:15 "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."
Revelation 3:14 of Jesus it says:
“To the angel of the congregation in La·o·di·ceʹa write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God:”

Provebs 8:22
“Jehovah produced me as the beginning of his way, The earliest of his achievements of long ago.“
 
Overall I agree with your comments. I think 'unforseen situation' is a slight misstatement in that I believe Jehovah foresaw any sitiuation and had set up solutions for whatever might happen. As far as Jesus being created, I know I'm probably in the minority in thinking that he wasn't created. At least I haven't read a scripture that he was. If someone can point one out to me, it will be appreciated.
John 1:14 “So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an only-begotten son from a father; and he was full of divine favor and truth.”
 
I don't think its fair when people simply post scripture intending to make a point in a discussion, simply for the fact it leaves the reader responsible for interpreting what they think the person is trying to say, and more often than not, in doing so, will arrive at a different conclusion than its intended purpose. It's an intellectually dishonest way of discussing things, and if you cannot elucidate a simple explanation of your intent or meaning behind these scriptures, please don't post them arbitrarily to me as if I can read your mind. Obviously, I can infer some sort of conclusion regarding what I think you mean, but why do you force me to speculate when you could simply make it clear in a few sentences. Bk Kevin, I am asking you please, to take a little more time in your replies or is this discussion not worthy of your full consideration?

I have provided reasoning why the 'us' in the scripture you provided from Gen 3:22 Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad," was not referring to the angelic creation, but rather was a statement between Jehovah and Jesus Christ-US. The same 'us' as when he tells Jesus "Let us make man in our image...". Obviously, he is not talking to the angels because the angels didn't make us, nor were we made in their image. I hope that clarifies that distinction.

To maintain a pure and perfect creation, any knowledge of bad would have been established or determined prior to creation, through the formation of standards. These standards are the perfect laws that govern our existence down to the minutest detail. This is no doubt how Jehovah and Jesus- us, knew what bad or evil was, because they themselves set the standards before the creation of all other entities.

Because a standard cannot be determined until first the limits of that standard are known, thus determining good and bad, it is clear that Jehovah and Jesus knew what these limits were when they set the foundation of the heavens and the universe, and all that exists within them. This was all done PRIOR to creation, when they were designing and calculating the expense of creation and all that it entails.

(Lu 14:28) “. . .For example, who of YOU that wants to build a tower does not first sit down and calculate the expense. . .”

To again use light as an illustration, the standard of light is set to 182,282 m/s. When Jehovah and Jesus Christ set this the standard apparently 183,000 m/s was bad, or beyond the limits of what their intended purpose for light was to do. Certainly, the same is true for all standards set, as to go beyond them is bad, and not conducive to a functioning universe.

Of course, physical laws are different than moral laws wherein the concept of free will lies. Physical standards and laws are not governed by the individual, but rather the existing physical statutes that are demonstrably set in stone, whereas free will is entirely governed by the one in which it resides regarding to what extreme it will be used. Although we can manipulate light to a certain degree, the standard will always be 182,282m/s, we cannot go beyond the standard, ever, and this axiom of truth will remain forever constant for all eternity.

Free will also has a standard, yet, built within the framework of free will is the ability to go beyond that standard as determined by the one who chooses to do so. We have the capacity to choose to go beyond the standards of love, joy, peace, long suffering, kindness etc..etc. and choose to do evil if we so desire. I believe this is where your scriptures above are pointing, but as I said I am only inferring your intent. Nevertheless, one can only have the knowledge of going beyond that standard of free will by the act, or creation, of doing so.

In other words, the only way one can grasp what it is like to go beyond the standard, that has been built into the framework of free will, is by choosing to create evil. Prior to the moment Satan went beyond that standard and created evil, no entity within creation had ever ventured beyond that standard, thus nobody knew what it was like to do evil, or bad. No one possessed awareness or knowledge of what it felt like to create evil, as it had never occurred since the inception of creation by Jehovah and Jesus Christ.

Does that mean that Satan wasn't aware of what badness was? NO! He was most certainly cognizant of the standard regulated by the conscience within him. He KNEW that exceeding that standard was bad. He was fully conscious that surpassing that standard would violate the law of free will, and that once he transgressed it by creating sin, he would be deviating from God's purpose ingrained within him to the core of his being. He understood that once he created sin, he would not only possess knowledge of good, which he had since his creation, but he would now also have knowledge of bad by surpassing the mandate of goodness dictated by free will.

Hence, the name of the tree, the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, could just as easily be dubbed the Tree of Knowledge of Free Will, given that until the precise moment of Satan's transgression, the potential to surpass the standard of free will had not yet been realized. There existed no precedent for such an event in all of history, limiting their knowledge solely to the perpetuation of goodness that had prevailed for eons. This occurrence set a precedent for the law of free will within creation, which had not been fully established prior.

Indeed, there is compelling reasoning to support this assertion. If Adam and Eve had abstained from consuming from the tree and still retained only the knowledge of creating good, the tree would still be named the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. This designation reflects the manifestation of what it symbolized into creation when Satan utilized his ability to sin, thereby acquiring the knowledge of both good and evil, which up unto this point had only been known by Jehovah and Jesus Christ.

As the scripture you provided so clearly states 'we are drawn out by our own desire'. Satan's desire to be worshipped blinded him to the standard, causing him to ignore the built-in conscience he had been given to guide his use of free will, and in doing so his creation would not reflect love back to Jehovah but rather hate, malice intent, selfishness, etc..etc. These bad reflections had never been experienced before within creation, and most certainly reverberated throughout, and the concept of sin could now be associated to an actual event. The angels would now have true knowledge of what it means to go beyond the standard, and actually create evil.

@Bk Kevin and @BARNABY THE DOG. , I hope this helps you to understand more clearly the perspective from my point of view. It has been a struggle for me to provide a clearer presentation of what it means to say that 'we cannot know something that does not yet exist' as it pertains to the creation of sin, and how this lack of knowledge prevented the standard of free will to be full recognized within creation. I stand firm by what I present, however if you still feel compelled to believe that the angels had knowledge of the creation of sin, evil, prior to Satans transgression, and that they could clearly explain what it felt like to have hate, malice, selfishness within them before the evil act occurred, I am open to your reasoning.
Actually, posting a scripture allows the reader to get the word straight from the mouth of Jehovah. Jesus spoke “not by my words, but of He whom sent me.” Often Jesus quoted the scripture and left it at that. “Let the reader use discernment“. Quoting scripture leaves the reader to address himself by the fact (not opinion) of the scripture. His heart will interpret it, his conscience dwell on it, his soul reason on it and will act as guide. Pray for understanding. It is far better to read and not understand and to ask instead of the creator, than it is to read the thoughts of man upon which to form faith. The Boreans did that. They listened to Paul and said, even to the anointed of Jehovah, “…we will read the scripture and see if it is true”. If you depend on man to supply your faith or argument, you are on the wrong road. Rather, listen to the man by all means, read the scripture pertaining to what is said, and make your own mind up according to your heart. Because your heart is what is judged. Pray for understanding. The one thing you can be certain of in this world, is that Christ knows his sheep - and they, His voice. You won’t be left out. The reality is simple. Each of us is alone on a desert island with just a bible. We are responsible for ourselves. If someone teaches us, we can of course be thankful. But the bible teaches us direct from Jehovah -“if you have ears, hear!” - and you want man’s advice?!
 
‭‭II Timothy‬ ‭3:14‭-‬15‬ ‭
[14] But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, [15] and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
[16] All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
[17] that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

Jesus used to quote the scriptures a lot.

‭‭Matthew‬ ‭4:4‬
[4] But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’ ”
 
Last edited:
Col 1:15 "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."
I agree. That would be one of the scriptures to use. Another commenter cited Revelation 3:14. Again another scripture in the NWT that supports your thought. So to "make sure of all things", let's look at the original greek. In Colossians 1:15 the words 'of all' could be translated 'over all'. Some translations use both in the same translation. In Rev. 3:14 the 'Beginning' could be translated 'Chief'. Both changes would make a big difference. However, this would not be considered definitive proof of Jesus being created or not. So as we are told over and over, context. The very next verse in Colossians, verse 16, which Robert just referred to a couple of days ago, says, "because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him and for him." This is from the NWT. From 1961's green bible through 1984 black bible to 2012, the NWT put brackets around the word 'other'. In the 2013 NWT, they removed the brackets. Why is that important. The 1984 NWT on page 1547 says "[ ] Brackets enclose words inserted to complete the sense in the English text". I think that's called adding to scripture and they did it twice in the same verse. I haven't found another translation that uses the word 'other'. I have found other translations that uses the word 'everything'. 1 Cor. 8:6 says, "there is actually to us one God, the Father, from whom all things are and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are and we through him." Heb. 2:10 says, "For it was fitting that the one for whom and through whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should make the Chief Agent of their salvation perfect through sufferings." John 1:3 says, "All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence." All these scriptures say 'all' with John saying not 'from him not even one thing'. Proverbs 8:22-30 definitely establishes Jesus was there before creation. Now let's go to John1:18. " No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god who is at the Father’s side is the one who has explained Him." A scripture that states as fact that Jesus was begotten (born). Back to the original scripture cited Col.1:15. Let's read it this way. "He is the image of the invisible god, the firstborn over all creation." Seems more logical in overall context.

Side note: The 2013 removed all the brackets around the words they added. Hmmm.
 
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭16:15‭-‬17‬ ‭
[15] He *said to them, “But who do you yourselves say that I am?” [16] Simon Peter answered, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” [17] And Jesus said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Barjona, because flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.

‭‭Mark‬ ‭14:61‭-‬62‬ ‭
[61] But He kept silent and did not offer any answer. Again the high priest was questioning Him, and *said to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?” [62] And Jesus said, “I am; and you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.”

‭‭Mark‬ ‭3:11‬ ‭
[11] And whenever the unclean spirits saw Him, they would fall down before Him and shout, “You are the Son of God!”

Jesus himself declared that he is the Son of Jehovah that means Jehovah fathered/created him.
 
Col 1:15 "He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation."
Overall I agree with your comments. I think 'unforseen situation' is a slight misstatement in that I believe Jehovah foresaw any sitiuation and had set up solutions for whatever might happen. As far as Jesus being created, I know I'm probably in the minority in thinking that he wasn't created. At least I haven't read a scripture that he was. If someone can point one out to me, it will be appreciated.

Isaiah28:​

16 therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said: “Here I am laying* as a foundation in Zion+ a stone,*+ a tried stone,+ the precious corner+ of a sure foundation.*+ No one exercising faith will get panicky.*+

Hebrews 5:9

5 So too the Christ did not glorify himself+ by becoming a high priest,+ but [was glorified+ by him] who spoke with reference to him: “You are my son; I, today, I have become your father.”+ 6 Just as he says also in another place: “You are a priest forever according to the manner* of Mel·chizʹe·dek.”+7 In the days of his flesh [Christ] offered up supplications and also petitions+ to the One who was able to save him out of death, with strong+ outcries and tears, and he was favorably heard for his godly fear.+ 8 Although he was a Son, he learned obedience from the things he suffered;+ 9 and after he had been made perfect*+ he became responsible for everlasting salvation+ to all those obeying him,+ 10 because he has been specifically called by God a high priest according to the manner of Mel·chizʹe·dek.+

Psalm 2:7

7 Let me refer to the decree of Jehovah;He has said to me: “You are my son;aI, today, I have become your father.b

Acts 13:33

33 that God has entirely fulfilled it to us their* children in that he resurrected Jesus;a even as it is written in the second psalm, ‘You are my son, I have become your Father this day.’b
 
Overall I agree with your comments. I think 'unforseen situation' is a slight misstatement in that I believe Jehovah foresaw any sitiuation and had set up solutions for whatever might happen. As far as Jesus being created, I know I'm probably in the minority in thinking that he wasn't created. At least I haven't read a scripture that he was. If someone can point one out to me, it will be appreciated.
Food for thought...
Excerpted from - He learned obedience from the things he suffered.
All of God’s dealings with humans have always depended upon obedience. God commanded Noah to build an ark. Noah did just so. God commanded Abraham to offer him his son. Abraham raised the knife. Jehovah commanded Moses to go to Egypt and confront Pharaoh. He did.

The sterling example of obedience came from Jehovah’s only-begotten Son. The scripture says he learned obedience from the things he suffered. That does not imply that Jesus was at any time disobedient. No, Jesus told the Jews that he always did the things pleasing to his Father. But before the Firstborn son came to earth he lived in supreme comfort and security. Obeying was easy. No problem. He was, after all, Jehovah’s most favored. He had everything. Because God willed it, he left it all behind.

We cannot imagine the magnitude of the step down for him— divesting himself of divinity and becoming human.Read more> https://e-watchman.com/he-learned-obedience-from-the-things-he-suffered/
 
Food for thought...
Excerpted from - He learned obedience from the things he suffered.
All of God’s dealings with humans have always depended upon obedience. God commanded Noah to build an ark. Noah did just so. God commanded Abraham to offer him his son. Abraham raised the knife. Jehovah commanded Moses to go to Egypt and confront Pharaoh. He did.

The sterling example of obedience came from Jehovah’s only-begotten Son. The scripture says he learned obedience from the things he suffered. That does not imply that Jesus was at any time disobedient. No, Jesus told the Jews that he always did the things pleasing to his Father. But before the Firstborn son came to earth he lived in supreme comfort and security. Obeying was easy. No problem. He was, after all, Jehovah’s most favored. He had everything. Because God willed it, he left it all behind.

We cannot imagine the magnitude of the step down for him— divesting himself of divinity and becoming human.Read more> https://e-watchman.com/he-learned-obedience-from-the-things-he-suffered/
I agree with cristo in an earlier comment where he said "I don't think its fair when people simply post scripture intending to make a point in a discussion, simply for the fact it leaves the reader responsible for interpreting what they think the person is trying to say, and more often than not, in doing so, will arrive at a different conclusion than its intended purpose."
I have the same problem trying to understand what the point is the person is trying to make. I believe the scriptures you cited in the post before this one, but appreciated your viewpoint on them. I agree with your assessments as stated. Thank you.
 
I don't think its fair when people simply post scripture intending to make a point in a discussion, simply for the fact it leaves the reader responsible for interpreting what they think the person is trying to say, and more often than not, in doing so, will arrive at a different conclusion than its intended purpose. It's an intellectually dishonest way of discussing things, and if you cannot elucidate a simple explanation of your intent or meaning behind these scriptures, please don't post them arbitrarily to me as if I can read your mind. Obviously, I can infer some sort of conclusion regarding what I think you mean, but why do you force me to speculate when you could simply make it clear in a few sentences. Bk Kevin, I am asking you please, to take a little more time in your replies or is this discussion not worthy of your full consideration?

I have provided reasoning why the 'us' in the scripture you provided from Gen 3:22 Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad," was not referring to the angelic creation, but rather was a statement between Jehovah and Jesus Christ-US. The same 'us' as when he tells Jesus "Let us make man in our image...". Obviously, he is not talking to the angels because the angels didn't make us, nor were we made in their image. I hope that clarifies that distinction.

To maintain a pure and perfect creation, any knowledge of bad would have been established or determined prior to creation, through the formation of standards. These standards are the perfect laws that govern our existence down to the minutest detail. This is no doubt how Jehovah and Jesus- us, knew what bad or evil was, because they themselves set the standards before the creation of all other entities.

Because a standard cannot be determined until first the limits of that standard are known, thus determining good and bad, it is clear that Jehovah and Jesus knew what these limits were when they set the foundation of the heavens and the universe, and all that exists within them. This was all done PRIOR to creation, when they were designing and calculating the expense of creation and all that it entails.

(Lu 14:28) “. . .For example, who of YOU that wants to build a tower does not first sit down and calculate the expense. . .”

To again use light as an illustration, the standard of light is set to 182,282 m/s. When Jehovah and Jesus Christ set this the standard apparently 183,000 m/s was bad, or beyond the limits of what their intended purpose for light was to do. Certainly, the same is true for all standards set, as to go beyond them is bad, and not conducive to a functioning universe.

Of course, physical laws are different than moral laws wherein the concept of free will lies. Physical standards and laws are not governed by the individual, but rather the existing physical statutes that are demonstrably set in stone, whereas free will is entirely governed by the one in which it resides regarding to what extreme it will be used. Although we can manipulate light to a certain degree, the standard will always be 182,282m/s, we cannot go beyond the standard, ever, and this axiom of truth will remain forever constant for all eternity.

Free will also has a standard, yet, built within the framework of free will is the ability to go beyond that standard as determined by the one who chooses to do so. We have the capacity to choose to go beyond the standards of love, joy, peace, long suffering, kindness etc..etc. and choose to do evil if we so desire. I believe this is where your scriptures above are pointing, but as I said I am only inferring your intent. Nevertheless, one can only have the knowledge of going beyond that standard of free will by the act, or creation, of doing so.

In other words, the only way one can grasp what it is like to go beyond the standard, that has been built into the framework of free will, is by choosing to create evil. Prior to the moment Satan went beyond that standard and created evil, no entity within creation had ever ventured beyond that standard, thus nobody knew what it was like to do evil, or bad. No one possessed awareness or knowledge of what it felt like to create evil, as it had never occurred since the inception of creation by Jehovah and Jesus Christ.

Does that mean that Satan wasn't aware of what badness was? NO! He was most certainly cognizant of the standard regulated by the conscience within him. He KNEW that exceeding that standard was bad. He was fully conscious that surpassing that standard would violate the law of free will, and that once he transgressed it by creating sin, he would be deviating from God's purpose ingrained within him to the core of his being. He understood that once he created sin, he would not only possess knowledge of good, which he had since his creation, but he would now also have knowledge of bad by surpassing the mandate of goodness dictated by free will.

Hence, the name of the tree, the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, could just as easily be dubbed the Tree of Knowledge of Free Will, given that until the precise moment of Satan's transgression, the potential to surpass the standard of free will had not yet been realized. There existed no precedent for such an event in all of history, limiting their knowledge solely to the perpetuation of goodness that had prevailed for eons. This occurrence set a precedent for the law of free will within creation, which had not been fully established prior.

Indeed, there is compelling reasoning to support this assertion. If Adam and Eve had abstained from consuming from the tree and still retained only the knowledge of creating good, the tree would still be named the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. This designation reflects the manifestation of what it symbolized into creation when Satan utilized his ability to sin, thereby acquiring the knowledge of both good and evil, which up unto this point had only been known by Jehovah and Jesus Christ.

As the scripture you provided so clearly states 'we are drawn out by our own desire'. Satan's desire to be worshipped blinded him to the standard, causing him to ignore the built-in conscience he had been given to guide his use of free will, and in doing so his creation would not reflect love back to Jehovah but rather hate, malice intent, selfishness, etc..etc. These bad reflections had never been experienced before within creation, and most certainly reverberated throughout, and the concept of sin could now be associated to an actual event. The angels would now have true knowledge of what it means to go beyond the standard, and actually create evil.

@Bk Kevin and @BARNABY THE DOG. , I hope this helps you to understand more clearly the perspective from my point of view. It has been a struggle for me to provide a clearer presentation of what it means to say that 'we cannot know something that does not yet exist' as it pertains to the creation of sin, and how this lack of knowledge prevented the standard of free will to be full recognized within creation. I stand firm by what I present, however if you still feel compelled to believe that the angels had knowledge of the creation of sin, evil, prior to Satans transgression, and that they could clearly explain what it felt like to have hate, malice, selfishness within them before the evil act occurred, I am open to your reasoning.
Well it's too bad you feel that way I meant you know wrong.
When I post something I keep everybody in mind so sometimes i just poste it in the main column.
I'm a person who doesn't write long elaborate explanations and just sticks to what the point is ,I found writings that go over more than 100 words usually get ignored nonetheless I'll keep your advice in mind thank you.
 
I agree with cristo in an earlier comment where he said "I don't think its fair when people simply post scripture intending to make a point in a discussion, simply for the fact it leaves the reader responsible for interpreting what they think the person is trying to say, and more often than not, in doing so, will arrive at a different conclusion than its intended purpose."
I have the same problem trying to understand what the point is the person is trying to make. I believe the scriptures you cited in the post before this one, but appreciated your viewpoint on them. I agree with your assessments as stated. Thank you.

And I agree with BARNABY THE DOG when he said" Actually, posting a scripture allows the reader to get the word straight from the mouth of Jehovah. Jesus spoke “not by my words, but of He whom sent me.” Often Jesus quoted the scripture and left it at that. “Let the reader use discernment“. Quoting scripture leaves the reader to address himself by the fact (not opinion) of the scripture. His heart will interpret it, his conscience dwell on it, his soul reason on it and will act as guide. Pray for understanding. It is far better to read and not understand and to ask instead of the creator, than it is to read the thoughts of man upon which to form faith. The Boreans did that. They listened to Paul and said, even to the anointed of Jehovah, “…we will read the scripture and see if it is true”. If you depend on man to supply your faith or argument, you are on the wrong road. Rather, listen to the man by all means, read the scripture pertaining to what is said, and make your own mind up according to your heart. Because your heart is what is judged. Pray for understanding. The one thing you can be certain of in this world, is that Christ knows his sheep - and they, His voice. You won’t be left out. The reality is simple. Each of us is alone on a desert island with just a bible. We are responsible for ourselves. If someone teaches us, we can of course be thankful. But the bible teaches us direct from Jehovah -“if you have ears, hear!” - and you want man’s advice?!​

 
Well it's too bad you feel that way I meant you know wrong.
When I post something I keep everybody in mind so sometimes i just poste it in the main column.
I'm a person who doesn't write long elaborate explanations and just sticks to what the point is ,I found writings that go over more than 100 words usually get ignored nonetheless I'll keep your advice in mind thank you.
I don't feel wronged at all. It's just with written conversation, I don't always pick up the nuances and inflections. I enjoy the scriptures you cite, but don't always understand your application to the topic.
 
Top