Everything about Covid is a lie-The Summary

BagdadBill

Well-known member
I don't know Bill, they seem to be ignoring all the "coincidences" pretty well up to now. I heard a doctor in an interview say that what shocks him is that nobody is too concerned when a loved one dies from "a sudden and unexplained death" anymore. No one is up in arms. It's like they're are indoctrinated into a death cult and as long as it's not them that's OK. Brainwashed, hypnotized NPCs. They are being led to an easy slaughter. Unfortunately, we're being dragged with them. Only Jehovah can protect us now.
I also would have expected more of a public outcry over the unexplained and early deaths. I mentioned my cousin’s jab death a few times before. Even though she wasn’t young, it was out of the blue. I asked my brother what reaction he saw in her family and he didn’t say anything noteworthy. Almost as if they thought it was normal or expected. It was a brain aneurysm from blood clotting and clotting was in the news aplenty. Apparently Fauci didn’t ask permission to declare that the scamdemic was over and he got called out on it. Very next day he tried to backpedal. This mass hypnosis is real.
 

kirmmy

Well-known member
This is the disturbing attitude I am even seeing in the friends and even my step-daughter. She did not want to take the vaccine, but she was coerced by the Society and her husband and she did get it. She did not get the booster but she is now saying that nothing bad happened to her and so it was no big deal. However, both she and her husband did have a cold that was pretty bad. They were sick for about a month. And, she knows of the friends who have been injured by the vaccine. My step-daughter and her husband have now recovered but I am recently hearing that the damage to the immune system by even the first 2 doses of the vaccine is permanent damage.
First off, sorry Bill about your cousin. I think I remember you mentioning her in another topic. She rests in God's loving hands now.

Something wild happened to me today. I went to get my hair cut. Not so wild right? Anyway, I've been going to this barber for many years. He's a nice guy, about 35-40 years old. We've talked about the Scandemic and he's definitely not brainwashed by the crapola that the world is spewing. Yet he got the shot! This was about a year ago. So today I was talking to him, and we usually have really good conversations, but he's saying things so fast I literally couldn't understand him. It was bizarre. I could only nod. No kidding, he would say something so fast that his words would run together. Vaxx injury, or too much caffeine? You decide.
 

kirmmy

Well-known member

Ms_ladyblue

Well-known member
That was a really good watch. Thanks for posting. There seems to be a pretty valid angle being presented here and it certainly helps to explain at least to a degree why the Society might compromise and walk in Lockstep with the UN.

Also that Tag or yours "Yup Yup Yup"........best Tag on the Forum. Love it.!! (y)
The video never came up. It’s just a black screen.
 

Jah-son

Well-known member
More evidence on the topic. Very good article and video. This is what I've come to understand to be truth over.the past 2 years. What we call Viruses do not cause sickness and probably dont even exist. Its actually a form of religion.

 

Driven

Well-known member
More evidence on the topic. Very good article and video. This is what I've come to understand to be truth over.the past 2 years. What we call Viruses do not cause sickness and probably dont even exist. Its actually a form of religion.

I actually don’t agree with the claim that viruses don’t exist but I don’t want to get into an argument. As far as the virus causing sickness, I think that is just semantics. It is often the way a person’s body reacts to the virus that makes them sick, but that reaction would not have happened if it had not been exposed to a virus. So, as the video states, circular reasoning. I would though like to point out that there is a lot of science and money, both with the intent to do good and to do evil, is devoted to “gain of function” in order to amplify the function of VIRUSES and PATHOGENS. Why would you or how could you amplify something non-existent?

While most people are not scientists and actually don’t have access to the type of equipment where they can view viruses, I think there is plenty of evidence that they do exist. Even the way they handle deadly viruses with the ”balloon” suits is because they use the force of air to keep the virus from entering the suit. That would be a lot of trouble to do if viruses don’t exist. I trust the science of Dr. Fleming of the Fleming Method. I guess each of us must decide for ourselves who we will trust and what evidence makes sense to us. I do take offense at saying that belief in viruses is a form of religion.

I have loved everything you have posted, Jah-son, until this one.
 

Jah-son

Well-known member
I actually don’t agree with the claim that viruses don’t exist but I don’t want to get into an argument. As far as the virus causing sickness, I think that is just semantics. It is often the way a person’s body reacts to the virus that makes them sick, but that reaction would not have happened if it had not been exposed to a virus. So, as the video states, circular reasoning. I would though like to point out that there is a lot of science and money, both with the intent to do good and to do evil, is devoted to “gain of function” in order to amplify the function of VIRUSES and PATHOGENS. Why would you or how could you amplify something non-existent?

While most people are not scientists and actually don’t have access to the type of equipment where they can view viruses, I think there is plenty of evidence that they do exist. Even the way they handle deadly viruses with the ”balloon” suits is because they use the force of air to keep the virus from entering the suit. That would be a lot of trouble to do if viruses don’t exist. I trust the science of Dr. Fleming of the Fleming Method. I guess each of us must decide for ourselves who we will trust and what evidence makes sense to us. I do take offense at saying that belief in viruses is a form of religion.

I have loved everything you have posted, Jah-son, until this one.
I appreciate you comments and point of view. Thanks for your expressions. I appreciate hearing a rebuttal because it causes me to reexamine my own thought process. The nice thing about this forum is that we are actually allowed to discuss and even disagree on matters. We aren't forced into a fake "Youuunitee" That's how we ultimately come to understand "truth" and grow in our understanding and human experience, by being challenged.
Science should be, and used to be, a method of discovery, not religious dogma. With that in mind, I should rather say that these ideas are my current leanings on the matter, rather than a dogmatic statement of truth. My wife is working with me on this flaw in my pattern of speech and thought.
With that being said, I can understand why you would be offended with the statement about it being a religion. I think the reason Dr Lanka is making the statement is that due to the fact that there is no real proof of viruses causing disease in his opinion and research, and that in his observation, what they are calling viruses have not been proven to exist, the concept would therefore be based on faith (religious belief). Maybe you already made that connection.
Before the planedemic, to my knowledge, it was taught that viruses are non living organisms, hence the reason antibiotics have no affect against viruses. So the whole viral replication and "intelligent" mutation into variants, made absolutely no logical sense to me. How can a non living thing replicate and attempt evasive maneuvers by mutating? Expecting me to swallow THAT is offensive. No other non living thing has ever replicated itself or displays intelligence to my knowledge (sounds like a Satanic lie to me). But because we can't see it (due to its size), we are expected to trust the "high priests" of science and their dogmatic assumptions of absolute truth on the matter.
Without going deep into the subject, that was my initial leap into investing and being open to other possibilities than those taught to me by the religion of "science".
Similar to religious beliefs, when we are raised believing and viewing the world a certain way, it can be difficult to open oneself to other possibilities. As my grandmother used to tell me when I would try to share bible truth with her, I was born a Catholic and I'm going to die a Catholic! And she sure as heck did. Even though she read the Bible daily, prayed and had what I perceived as great faith. But faith in "what" and based on what is the question?
I think it's also in this sense that Lanka is calling virus theory a religious belief. People cling to it because that's what they were taught to believe and that's what everyone else whom they know believes.
I'm not offended if people want to wrap themselves in plastic and slather in sanitizer because they are afraid of a non living, microscopic genetic particle that they believe is intelligent enough to mutate in order to resist the latest vaccine. But I cannot deny that what we have been led to believe and act on as a result (obsessive cleansing rituals, masking, almost worshipful acquiescence to authorities, obsessive fear, injections of magical potions, ect) all based on an unseen, undetectable evil entity, very much resembles a religious cult.
I realize that not everyone takes it to that extreme.
If your view is different than mine, that's ok. I'm fine with that as long as your belief doesn't infringe on my freedoms and worship. In your case, know they don't because you are reasonable enough to be here disgusted with the overreaction.
To address the gain of function angle, I don't deny that something toxic is affecting people. But the whole gain of function story is really just another "faith" movement. Is it credible? Can it be verified? There are innumerable environmental toxins, or flat out poisons, many undetectable or at least unseen (i.e. radiation, fungi, certain forms of bacteria), that can have similar effects on people that we could entitle gain of function "covid". We already know that the few ingredients which have been made known this far in the injection concoctions are highly toxic (SM103, polyethylene glycol, lipid nanoparticles, etc.) It's been shown repeatedly and I have proof that the deadly "virus" didn't arrive in most countries until shortly after the injection rollout. My belief from the beginning of all this is that the "virus" and almost every modern epidemic is actually induced by the very Pharmaceutical industry that claims to be fighting disease. Is is really that difficult to believe that the Rockefeller created modern Pharmaceutical industry would be capable of such a thing? It makes perfect sense to me and stinks of demonic direction. All built on a lie, ultimately blaming nature (Jehovah). BTW, I feel the same way about the entire man made global warming / climate change religion...inspired of demons. But that's just a conspiracy theory. I could be wrong. And that's ok.
 

BagdadBill

Well-known member
I actually don’t agree with the claim that viruses don’t exist but I don’t want to get into an argument. As far as the virus causing sickness, I think that is just semantics.
For all the Witnesses who supposedly died from covid, how many had autopsies? I won't claim to know but I would bet my paycheck right now that it was less than five, if any. They just weren't doing any because that would have been one more way to expose the sleight of hand. It has also been asked, what were the average ages of those who died?
This is starting to pick up pace again and I suspect it is because they are either impatient or that they realize people are waking up. Don't trust anything in the news, no matter how much you like the presenter. I notice that the information released about MonkeySnot is an attempt to point the finger at the gay population. Kind of strange since these people don't have what we would consider morals but I believe it is intentional, as an effort to provoke another division and reaction. With regard to the shooting in Texas, I am now hearing some pretty obvious discrepancies in the stories the police are telling. Anderson Cooper was interviewing a man who sounded like he was crying but, no tears. Not even one. It might be hot in Texas right now but it ain't that hot. One reporter said that they had to send the parent's DNA samples out so as to ID one of the children. There is no way this kid fired so many rounds into one kid that she became that unrecognizable. A parent or a principle could have figured that out and they would have known which classroom she was in anyway. That's what they do. Another thing is that anywhere else at any other time in America it takes at least two weeks for DNA results. They got it in one day? Not buying it. Too many things aren't adding up. Expect more of that. Lies upon lies.
 
Top