BARNABY THE DOG.
Well-known member
In modern parlance, perhaps “slave class” should be termed as “employee“. In many cases in Roman antiquity, slaves were inclined to be treated with more respect -perhaps ‘humanity’ is a great better word - than were for instance African people were by the British and American slave traders of recent times. I’m not trying to equate slavery with employment, but that a faithful employee is dedicated to his employer’s interests in much the same way as witnesses work conscientiously for watchtower. In actual fact, in terms of social responsibility, watchtower is probably closer to slavers in their treatment of the brethren, than any other volunteer human resource that I know of. The illustration ofI asked what you meant by "The whole slave class deal isn't biblical..." The G/B claiming to be the "faithful and discrete slave"
is not backed by the scriptures. But when Jesus asked the rhetorical question, he did say in the next verse, "Happy is that slave if his master on coming finds him doing so." Since the master has not come to make the inspection yet, that slave must be getting on in years ( 2000 plus yrs in fact )
The context shows that Jesus was not talking about a single individual but a composite class spanning a long period of time, from the time when the master left a slave in charge of his interests, until he shoes up to make the inspection. Since no-one human can live that long, Jesus words would have to apply to a "slave class" over the long period. So while "slave class" is
not mentioned in the bible the concept is supported.
”slave” is the degree of devotion that title denotes - whole souled, diligent and honest in dealing with his master’s needs and being both honourable with and willingly attentive to, his needs. The modern illustration of slavery is rife with feelings of animosity and injustice and rightly so as the modern slave is treated as no more than a resource and despised.
The GB though like to have it both ways in calling themselves faithful and discreet; they assume honour upon themselves, and by doing so, they play false to their role in slavery assuming for themselves, the essence of truth, in that they alone, know what truth is - and thus assume the place of their master. So what you say is true. It’s all in the context.
Last edited: