Dreams from God are not always spectacular like that of Daniel but can be different than a normal dream. Like Paul’s dream of being invited to cross over to Macedonia. He concluded that it was from God.(Acts 16:9,10)
Dreams also are not exclusive for the anointed, it can be even given to those not servant of Jehovah.For example, the dream of the chief cupbearer and the chief baker, Pharaoh and Alexander the Great. So the great crowd can also experience it.
Someone here in the forum I can’t remember exactly, shared his dream about the two roads, one leading to life and the other to destruction. I can conclude that that dream is from God as he was guided or reminded on what path to take.
It seems to me that God will not communicate through dreams to those who do not even believe in it, like in the time of Jesus where he had done miracles only to those who believe. But still, God will communicate to us through other means such as the Bible, or friends and family etc. on certain path to take or to be reminded.
But why would Jehovah speak in a dream that the recipient could not understand? It does not make sense unless it has an outcome. In the bible, such inexplicable dreams or visions are recorded for the very point of it’s revelation in meaning. The bible notes on one occasion at least, that seers and tellers of fortune were summoned to explain the dream, but could not. Thus Daniel‘s explanation, that proved True, became an explicit lesson from Jehovah. I think you may not be correct in assuming that Jehovah would not engender a dream in a person whom did not believe that dreams may have a significance. The reason being as stated above. Someone else, as a clear and known follower of Jehovah is given the task of revealing such prophesy, so that Jehovah is glorified. Moses was used in similar fashion, not in dreams, but in prophesy, but the issue is the same.
Your argument in that Jehovah would only speak in dreams to those that believe that He would do so, is in my opinion flawed. As the bible shows, the very act of interpretation from an outside source is used to reveal Jehovah’s judgement for the very reason, man could not. Jesus gave examples of miracles to those who followed him for a specific reason to establish outcomes in faith through a lesson. E.g, fishing from the other side of the boat.. He also spoke in terms they could not understand for the same reason. ‘…Eat of my flesh, drink of my blood.” Did they have to believe in that to understand it? Clearly not. Did Jesus explain himself, there and then? No. So then, it appears that Jehovah follows His own laws in communication, ergo, equal and opposite forces have a reaction on the mind, as well as in objects. Teaching, learning, is acquired through other ways other than explicit examples and we see that learning can be acquired through the very act of not understanding and of being impelled to seek an answer. That takes faith.
There is another pitfall in seeking to attribute Jehovah’s intervention and thus gain fame as a seer. The brother who mentioned his dream of the wide and narrow pathways is more easily explained in that the brain reviews information independently of consciousness. There are several levels of consciousness (five) that we know of. It would be far more likely that the processes by which these levels function are responsible in that Jehovah designed the brain to perform such, than by His direct intervention.
I do not doubt that Jehovah does, and would lead His people. I assume myself to have seen His hand in my life course in retrospect. If the brethren feel that they have been spoken to or reminded by Jehovah then who am I to gainsay such heartfelt reward? If reward it is and not self imposed. The very point of the scripture and trial of life at this time, indeed, throughout history, is that we strive for ourselves to show faith in every expression of our daily life. Are we to assume then, that this is all helped along by dreams we do not understand, and every small success we achieve as a direct intervention from the creator? How then do we invest the figurative Talent He has given us to spend and increase for Him? The example you offer about Paul hardly bears confirmation of your point when applied to a man that was personally visited, spoken to and blinded by Christ on his journey to Damascus. If that occurred to me and that later I received a definitive dream of such clarity that it left me in no doubt whom it came from or what it meant, I too would get going.
Perhaps I am too cynical. But I prefer to examine critically against my natural desire to believe. I would like to be able to attribute my daily life experiences to Jehovah. I see a blessing in this site, from Jehovah like everyone else here and even in some of my accomplishments or rewards in life, but in general, I see Jehovah’s impact on my life in much the same way as the psalmist who said, “he leads me in green pastures” etc, or in other words, he shows the way, but that is is up to me to walk it. He presents me with wood - I carve it, He gives me truth, I test it and make it my own. He gives me trials, I (hope to) withstand it. He allows contests of strength with evil, I (try to) deny it. I am allowed to be blind in my pathway and walk alone, and am given the option to rely on Him and to not see, but still believe, as Christ said to Thomas. I would gladly rely on Jehovah to come to my aid and hope sincerely, that I am strong enough when that time comes, but until then, I would rather prove my own faith and gratitude through works and prayer. That is the point is it not? I recall an example that Robert wrote about his life, in that he was on the ministry, frozen to the bone, saying to himself that if the next door he knocked on was a rebuke, he was going home, and lo and behold, he got a welcome and a hot drink - something like that anyway. Jehovah’s hand or chance? Therein is the value if it is to be found. Who can understand prophesy or reward before it is fulfilled? Watchtower is a good example of trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole. I am reluctant to follow their path by a different route down the road of assumption.